TG
Tredegar Corporation
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Market Cap$354M
5Y Perf.-32.4%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TG vs HUN vs DOW vs LYB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
Chemicals
Market Cap$2.56B
5Y Perf.-17.6%
DOW
Dow Inc.
Chemicals
Market Cap$26.86B
5Y Perf.-4.5%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$23.04B
5Y Perf.+12.5%
TG vs HUN vs DOW vs LYB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TG | HUN | DOW | LYB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $354M | $2.56B | $26.86B | $23.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $723M | $5.69B | $39.33B | $22.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $-324M | $-2.76B | $-774M |
| Gross Margin | 14.7% | 12.9% | 6.2% | -19.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | -1.0% | -2.3% | -0.9% |
| Forward P/E | 4.9x | — | 12.5x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $2.73B | $19.60B | $15.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $429M | $3.82B | $3.45B |
TG vs HUN vs DOW vs LYB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TG
HUN
DOW
LYB
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tredegar Corporation (TG) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 82.4 | -17.6% |
| Dow Inc. (DOW) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
| LyondellBasell Indu… (LYB) | 100 | 112.5 | +12.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TG vs HUN vs DOW vs LYB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TG leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. LyondellBasell Industries N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. HUN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TG
Tredegar Corporation
The Growth Play
TG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 136.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.7%
- 20.9% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2%
- Lower P/E (4.9x vs 9.6x)
- 4.6% margin vs DOW's -7.0%
Best for: growth exposure
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
The Momentum Pick
HUN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.5% vs TG's +24.9%
Best for: momentum
DOW
Dow Inc.
The Defensive Pick
DOW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 1.97x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
The Income Pick
LYB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.7%
- 48.6% 10Y total return vs HUN's 57.6%
- Beta 0.38, yield 7.7%, current ratio 1.77x
- Beta 0.38 vs HUN's 1.73
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TG | 20.9% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2% |
| Value | TG | Lower P/E (4.9x vs 9.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | TG | 4.6% margin vs DOW's -7.0% |
| Stability / Safety | LYB | Beta 0.38 vs HUN's 1.73 |
| Dividends | LYB | 7.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HUN's 5.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | HUN | +37.5% vs TG's +24.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TG | 9.0% ROA vs DOW's -4.6%, ROIC 7.8% vs 0.6% |
TG vs HUN vs DOW vs LYB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
TG vs HUN vs DOW vs LYB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTGLAGGINGDOW
Who Leads Where
TG leads in 2 of 6 categories
HUN leads 1 • LYB leads 1 • DOW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓DOWDow Inc.
0leads
LYBLyondellBasell Indust…
1leads
HUNHuntsman Corporation
1leads
TGTredegar Corporation
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HUNvs LYBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TG5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
HUN3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TG9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
LYB2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 54.4x TG's $723M. TG is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOW's -7.0%. On growth, TG holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TGTredegar Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $723M | $5.7B | $39.3B | $22.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $160M | $1.3B | $865M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | -$324M | -$2.8B | -$774M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $135M | -$2.0B | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +12.9% | +6.2% | -19.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -1.0% | -2.3% | -0.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | -5.7% | -7.0% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +2.4% | -5.1% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +0.7% | -6.1% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | -3.3% | -68.2% | -100.0% |
TG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
HUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TG's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYB's 33.4x.
| Metric | TGTredegar Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $354M | $2.6B | $26.9B | $23.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $4.9B | $42.6B | $35.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.75x | -9.27x | -10.11x | -30.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.89x | — | 12.47x | 9.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.85x | 19.64x | 13.78x | 33.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.45x | 0.67x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.63x | 0.86x | 1.52x | 2.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.49x | 22.11x | — | 59.99x |
HUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TG delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-15 for DOW. TG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYB's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TG scores 7/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TGTredegar Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.7% | -8.1% | -15.4% | -7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.0% | -4.6% | -4.6% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | -0.6% | +0.6% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | -0.7% | +0.5% | -1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.92x | 1.12x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42M | $2.3B | $15.8B | $12.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $429M | $3.8B | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $2.7B | $19.6B | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.63x | -1.08x | -1.51x | -1.42x |
TG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TG and HUN and LYB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYB five years ago would be worth $8,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,018 for HUN. Over the past 12 months, HUN leads with a +37.5% total return vs TG's +24.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TG at 8.9% vs HUN's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TGTredegar Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | +45.5% | +55.2% | +62.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.9% | +37.5% | +37.3% | +37.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.0% | -33.3% | -17.5% | -5.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | -39.8% | -27.2% | -11.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.7% | +57.6% | +12.2% | +48.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | -12.6% | -6.2% | -1.9% |
Evenly matched — TG and HUN and LYB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TG and LYB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYB is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUN's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TG currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs LYB's 85.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TGTredegar Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.41x | 1.82x | 0.69x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.34 | $15.89 | $42.74 | $83.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.25 | $7.30 | $20.40 | $41.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +92.7% | +87.3% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.8 | 65.4 | 48.9 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 148K | 6.2M | 14.4M | 8.1M |
Evenly matched — TG and LYB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
LYB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TG as "Hold", HUN as "Hold", DOW as "Hold", LYB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.9% upside for LYB (target: $79) vs -16.9% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, LYB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.66% vs DOW's 5.61%.
| Metric | TGTredegar Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.25 | $39.55 | $79.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 33 | 35 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.7% | +5.6% | +7.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.85 | $2.09 | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
LYB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallTredegar Corporation (TG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TG vs HUN vs DOW vs LYB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TG or HUN or DOW or LYB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tredegar Corporation (TG) is the stronger pick with 20.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Tredegar Corporation (TG) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tredegar Corporation (TG) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TG or HUN or DOW or LYB?
On forward P/E, Tredegar Corporation is actually cheaper at 4.
9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TG or HUN or DOW or LYB?
Over the past 5 years, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) delivered a total return of -11. 3%, compared to -39. 8% for Huntsman Corporation (HUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUN returned +59. 2% versus TG's -14. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TG or HUN or DOW or LYB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Huntsman Corporation's 1. 82β — meaning HUN is approximately 469% more volatile than LYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tredegar Corporation (TG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 156% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TG or HUN or DOW or LYB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tredegar Corporation (TG) is pulling ahead at 20.
9% versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tredegar Corporation grew EPS 136. 7% year-over-year, compared to -335. 0% for Dow Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TG leads at -1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TG or HUN or DOW or LYB?
Tredegar Corporation (TG) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
3% net margin versus -6. 6% for Dow Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TG leads at 3. 7% versus -1. 1% for LYB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TG leads at 14. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TG or HUN or DOW or LYB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tredegar Corporation (TG) trades at 4.
9x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Dow Inc. — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYB: 10. 9% to $79. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — TG or HUN or DOW or LYB?
In this comparison, LYB (7.
7% yield), HUN (5. 7% yield), DOW (5. 6% yield) pay a dividend. TG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TG or HUN or DOW or LYB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), 7. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYB: +49. 0%, TG: -14. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TG and HUN and DOW and LYB?
These companies operate in different sectors (TG (Industrials) and HUN (Basic Materials) and DOW (Basic Materials) and LYB (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TG is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DOW is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LYB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. HUN, DOW, LYB pay a dividend while TG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TG: 268.1% · HUN: 0.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.