Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TG vs SLGN vs SEE vs UFPI vs MTRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Industrial Materials
TG vs SLGN vs SEE vs UFPI vs MTRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $354M | $4.25B | $6.21B | $4.76B | $3.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $723M | $6.58B | $5.36B | $6.19B | $1.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $283M | $506M | $264M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | 14.7% | 17.4% | 29.8% | 16.6% | 15.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 9.8% | 13.5% | 5.4% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 4.8x | 10.6x | 12.4x | 15.9x | 30.0x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $4.62B | $4.10B | $230M | $601M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $1.08B | $344M | $925M | $14M |
TG vs SLGN vs SEE vs UFPI vs MTRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tredegar Corporation (TG) | 100 | 66.5 | -33.5% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 183.4 | +83.4% |
| Materion Corporation (MTRN) | 100 | 363.9 | +263.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TG vs SLGN vs SEE vs UFPI vs MTRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 136.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.7%
- 20.9% revenue growth vs UFPI's -5.0%
- Lower P/E (4.8x vs 15.9x)
- 9.0% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 7.8% vs 8.7%
SLGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs UFPI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.
- 9.4% margin vs MTRN's 4.0%
- Beta 0.32 vs MTRN's 1.62
UFPI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 7.4%, current ratio 4.59x
MTRN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs UFPI's 230.6%
- PEG 0.82 vs SEE's 9.73
- +163.9% vs SLGN's -23.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.9% revenue growth vs UFPI's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs MTRN's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs MTRN's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs UFPI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.9% vs SLGN's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 7.8% vs 8.7% |
TG vs SLGN vs SEE vs UFPI vs MTRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TG vs SLGN vs SEE vs UFPI vs MTRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEE leads in 1 of 6 categories
UFPI leads 1 • MTRN leads 1 • SLGN leads 1 • TG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 9.1x TG's $723M. SEE is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTRN's 4.0%. On growth, TG holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $723M | $6.6B | $5.4B | $6.2B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $966M | $965M | $498M | $187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $283M | $506M | $264M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $307M | $459M | $298M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +17.4% | +29.8% | +16.6% | +15.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +9.8% | +13.5% | +5.4% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +4.3% | +9.4% | +4.3% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +4.7% | +8.6% | +4.8% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +6.5% | +2.1% | -8.4% | +30.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | -6.3% | +16.4% | -31.5% | +8.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TG and UFPI each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 77% valuation discount to MTRN's 53.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MTRN offers better value at 1.45x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $354M | $4.3B | $6.2B | $4.8B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $7.8B | $10.0B | $4.1B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.75x | 14.91x | 12.29x | 16.77x | 53.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.81x | 10.60x | 12.38x | 15.92x | 29.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 9.66x | 3.67x | 1.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.85x | 7.97x | 14.33x | 7.70x | 24.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.66x | 1.16x | 0.75x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.63x | 1.89x | 5.02x | 1.60x | 4.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.49x | 10.07x | 13.54x | 17.24x | 79.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $8 for MTRN. UFPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs UFPI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.7% | +12.5% | +48.4% | +8.4% | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.0% | +3.0% | +7.1% | +6.5% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +8.7% | +11.2% | +11.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +9.9% | +14.1% | +10.2% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 2.03x | 3.31x | 0.07x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42M | $3.5B | $3.8B | -$695M | $587M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $1.1B | $344M | $925M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $4.6B | $4.1B | $230M | $601M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.63x | 3.36x | 1.95x | 43.92x | 4.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTRN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTRN five years ago would be worth $25,559 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,483 for TG. Over the past 12 months, MTRN leads with a +163.9% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTRN at 22.7% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | -1.9% | +2.0% | -8.6% | +48.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.9% | -23.7% | +44.2% | -12.0% | +163.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.0% | -11.1% | +2.4% | +6.3% | +84.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | +1.4% | -19.1% | +1.5% | +155.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.7% | +80.8% | +4.4% | +230.6% | +724.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | -3.8% | +0.8% | +2.1% | +22.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TG and SEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTRN's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TG currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 0.66x | 0.32x | 0.92x | 1.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.34 | $57.04 | $44.27 | $118.00 | $201.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.25 | $36.15 | $28.15 | $80.06 | $70.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +70.6% | +95.2% | +71.1% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.8 | 51.1 | 64.0 | 35.6 | 71.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 148K | 769K | 3.0M | 379K | 232K |
Analyst Outlook
SLGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TG as "Hold", SLGN as "Buy", SEE as "Buy", UFPI as "Buy", MTRN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs -15.7% for MTRN (target: $161). For income investors, SLGN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.00% vs MTRN's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.50 | $43.50 | $103.00 | $161.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 21 | 27 | 8 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% | +1.9% | +1.7% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 21 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.80 | $0.81 | $1.40 | $0.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +9.1% | +0.3% |
SEE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). UFPI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
TG vs SLGN vs SEE vs UFPI vs MTRN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TG or SLGN or SEE or UFPI or MTRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tredegar Corporation (TG) is the stronger pick with 20.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TG or SLGN or SEE or UFPI or MTRN?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Materion Corporation at 53. 4x. On forward P/E, Tredegar Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Materion Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TG or SLGN or SEE or UFPI or MTRN?
Over the past 5 years, Materion Corporation (MTRN) delivered a total return of +155.
6%, compared to -25. 2% for Tredegar Corporation (TG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTRN returned +724. 3% versus TG's -15. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TG or SLGN or SEE or UFPI or MTRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Materion Corporation's 1. 62β — meaning MTRN is approximately 400% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TG or SLGN or SEE or UFPI or MTRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tredegar Corporation (TG) is pulling ahead at 20.
9% versus -5. 0% for UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Materion Corporation grew EPS 1179% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for UFP Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTRN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TG or SLGN or SEE or UFPI or MTRN?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus 3. 3% for Tredegar Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 3. 7% for TG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TG or SLGN or SEE or UFPI or MTRN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Tredegar Corporation (TG) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 30. 0x for Materion Corporation — 25. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TG or SLGN or SEE or UFPI or MTRN?
In this comparison, SLGN (2.
0% yield), SEE (1. 9% yield), UFPI (1. 7% yield), MTRN (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TG or SLGN or SEE or UFPI or MTRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, TG: -15. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TG and SLGN and SEE and UFPI and MTRN?
These companies operate in different sectors (TG (Industrials) and SLGN (Consumer Cyclical) and SEE (Consumer Cyclical) and UFPI (Basic Materials) and MTRN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SLGN, SEE, UFPI pay a dividend while TG, MTRN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.