TGB vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO

For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Teck Resources Limited (TECK) offers the better valuation at 31. 3x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teck Resources Limited (TECK) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the cheapest at 31.

3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 40. 6x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 77x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) delivered a total return of +199.

6%, compared to +50. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGB returned +1313% versus FCX's +517. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

81β versus Taseko Mines Limited's 2. 04β — meaning TGB is approximately 13% more volatile than TECK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 96% for Taseko Mines Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.

6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teck Resources Limited grew EPS 262. 8% year-over-year, compared to -104. 2% for Taseko Mines Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGB leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus -4. 5% for Taseko Mines Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for Southern Copper Corporation — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TGB: 20. 2% to $9. 00.

In this comparison, SCCO (1.

6% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. TGB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

6% yield, +643. 8% 10Y return). Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TECK: +643. 8%, TGB: +1313%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TECK, FCX, SCCO pay a dividend while TGB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.