Copper
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TGB vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
Copper
Copper
Copper
TGB vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Copper | Industrial Materials | Copper | Copper | Copper |
| Market Cap | $2.33B | $31.23B | $88.60B | $153.06B | $9.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $768M | $12.41B | $26.42B | $13.42B | $2.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $1.85B | $2.73B | $4.33B | $570M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 30.3% | 27.8% | 56.7% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.8% | 23.9% | 27.8% | 52.2% | 41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.4x | 13.4x | 23.1x | 26.4x | 16.1x |
| Total Debt | $747M | $10.39B | $11.50B | $7.41B | $1.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $188M | $5.01B | $3.35B | $4.30B | $568M |
TGB vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) | 100 | 1886.2 | +1786.2% |
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 683.6 | +583.6% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 536.3 | +436.3% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) | 100 | 926.7 | +826.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGB vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 13.1% 10Y total return vs SCCO's 6.9%
- +278.3% vs FCX's +66.1%
TECK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.81, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
- 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 16.1x)
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.85, yield 1.0%
- PEG 0.77 vs SCCO's 1.27
- 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SCCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.88, yield 1.6%, current ratio 3.89x
- 32.3% margin vs TGB's 2.0%
- 21.4% ROA vs TGB's 0.6%, ROIC 38.6% vs 8.4%
Among these 5 stocks, HBM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 16.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs TGB's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.81 vs TGB's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +278.3% vs FCX's +66.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs TGB's 0.6%, ROIC 38.6% vs 8.4% |
TGB vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TGB vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
TGB leads 1 • TECK leads 1 • FCX leads 0 • HBM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 34.4x TGB's $768M. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGB's 2.0%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $768M | $12.4B | $26.4B | $13.4B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $317M | $4.8B | $9.6B | $7.9B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $1.8B | $2.7B | $4.3B | $570M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $482M | $6.2B | $3.4B | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | +30.3% | +27.8% | +56.7% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +23.9% | +27.8% | +52.2% | +41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +14.9% | +10.3% | +32.3% | +25.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +3.9% | +23.6% | +25.5% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.6% | +72.2% | +12.2% | +39.0% | +26.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +147.3% | +128.8% | +154.2% | +54.5% | +5.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TECK and FCX each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, HBM trades at a 58% valuation discount to FCX's 40.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.35x vs SCCO's 1.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $31.2B | $88.6B | $153.1B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $35.2B | $96.8B | $156.2B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -110.16x | 31.32x | 40.56x | 35.36x | 17.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.38x | 13.45x | 23.07x | 26.44x | 16.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | 1.69x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.05x | 13.09x | 11.34x | 19.84x | 10.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.74x | 3.97x | 3.44x | 11.41x | 4.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.61x | 1.69x | 2.89x | 13.99x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 79.39x | 44.67x | 50.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $2 for TGB. HBM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGB's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs TGB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.3% | +7.1% | +8.9% | +42.0% | +19.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +4.1% | +4.7% | +21.4% | +9.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +4.4% | +12.8% | +38.6% | +12.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +4.2% | +12.4% | +39.2% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 0.40x | 0.37x | 0.67x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $559M | $5.4B | $8.1B | $3.1B | $524M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $188M | $5.0B | $3.4B | $4.3B | $568M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $747M | $10.4B | $11.5B | $7.4B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.54x | 4.16x | 17.68x | 19.33x | 13.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGB five years ago would be worth $29,960 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,091 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, TGB leads with a +278.3% total return vs FCX's +66.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGB at 70.2% vs TECK's 14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.8% | +35.3% | +19.3% | +25.3% | +24.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +278.3% | +87.9% | +66.1% | +115.6% | +228.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +392.8% | +49.8% | +73.6% | +158.7% | +372.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.6% | +167.6% | +50.9% | +163.0% | +178.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1313.2% | +643.8% | +517.6% | +690.4% | +584.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +70.2% | +14.4% | +20.2% | +37.3% | +67.9% |
Risk & Volatility
TECK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TECK is the less volatile stock with a 1.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGB's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs TGB's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 1.81x | 1.85x | 1.88x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.25 | $64.92 | $70.97 | $223.89 | $28.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.89 | $30.98 | $35.15 | $86.25 | $7.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.0% | +99.9% | +86.9% | +82.8% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 59.0 | 48.5 | 50.6 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.9M | 3.8M | 15.2M | 1.6M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCX and SCCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TGB as "Hold", TECK as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", HBM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.2% upside for TGB (target: $9) vs -58.7% for HBM (target: $10). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.60% vs TECK's 0.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $64.50 | $67.00 | $156.40 | $10.34 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 26 | 41 | 30 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +1.0% | +1.6% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.50 | $0.60 | $2.96 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TGB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TGB vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGB or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teck Resources Limited (TECK) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGB or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
On trailing P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 40. 6x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 77x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGB or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
Over the past 5 years, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) delivered a total return of +199.
6%, compared to +50. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGB returned +1313% versus FCX's +517. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGB or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
81β versus Taseko Mines Limited's 2. 04β — meaning TGB is approximately 13% more volatile than TECK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 96% for Taseko Mines Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGB or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to -104. 2% for Taseko Mines Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGB leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGB or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus -4. 5% for Taseko Mines Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGB or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for Southern Copper Corporation — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TGB: 20. 2% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGB or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
6% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. TGB, HBM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGB or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
6% yield, +643. 8% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TECK: +643. 8%, HBM: +584. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGB and TECK and FCX and SCCO and HBM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HBM is a small-cap deep-value stock. TECK, FCX, SCCO pay a dividend while TGB, HBM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.