THCH vs QSR vs MCD vs SBUX

For growth investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) is the stronger pick with 12. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 7% for TH International Limited (THCH). McDonald's Corporation (MCD) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (21. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the cheapest at 23.

1x versus Starbucks Corporation at 64. 4x. On forward P/E, Restaurant Brands International Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: McDonald's Corporation wins at 1. 54x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 83x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) delivered a total return of +31. 9%, compared to -96. 0% for TH International Limited (THCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCD returned +151. 6% versus THCH's -96. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TH International Limited (THCH) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

11β versus Starbucks Corporation's 0. 98β — meaning SBUX is approximately -969% more volatile than THCH relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) is pulling ahead at 12. 2% versus -11. 7% for TH International Limited (THCH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TH International Limited grew EPS 55. 3% year-over-year, compared to -50. 8% for Starbucks Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, THCH leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

9% net margin versus -29. 6% for TH International Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus -25. 1% for THCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCD leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 54x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 83x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 44. 1x for Starbucks Corporation — 24. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MCD: 26. 0% to $347. 33.

In this comparison, QSR (3.

0% yield), MCD (2. 6% yield), SBUX (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. THCH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

12), 2. 6% yield, +151. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +151. 6%, SBUX: +115. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: THCH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QSR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; MCD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SBUX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. QSR, MCD, SBUX pay a dividend while THCH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.