Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
THR vs TRMK vs HOMB vs BDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Communication Equipment
THR vs TRMK vs HOMB vs BDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $2.64B | $5.29B | $4.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $522M | $1.12B | $1.45B | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $224M | $458M | $237M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 71.0% | 65.6% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | 25.5% | 36.0% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | 30.9x | 11.5x | 10.8x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $152M | $1.12B | $1.20B | $1.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $668M | $910M | $390M |
THR vs TRMK vs HOMB vs BDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermon Group Holdi… (THR) | 100 | 409.6 | +309.6% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.0 | +88.0% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Belden Inc. (BDC) | 100 | 329.9 | +229.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: THR vs TRMK vs HOMB vs BDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
THR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 251.9% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.7%
- +136.2% vs HOMB's -1.9%
- 7.2% ROA vs TRMK's 1.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs 7.1%
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and value.
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs THR's 0.7%
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 30.9x)
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 0.16x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.16x
- NIM 3.8% vs TRMK's 3.4%
BDC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 23.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- PEG 0.38 vs HOMB's 3.55
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs THR's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 30.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.7% margin vs BDC's 8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs THR's 1.49, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs TRMK's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.2% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.2% ROA vs TRMK's 1.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs 7.1% |
THR vs TRMK vs HOMB vs BDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
THR vs TRMK vs HOMB vs BDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories
THR leads 2 • TRMK leads 1 • BDC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 5.3x THR's $522M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BDC's 8.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $522M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $106M | $323M | $601M | $475M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | $224M | $458M | $237M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $55M | $230M | $354M | $180M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +71.0% | +65.6% | +35.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +20.0% | +27.7% | +8.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +20.7% | +29.1% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | — | — | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +5.4% | +26.0% | +2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 71% valuation discount to THR's 41.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BDC offers better value at 0.51x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $2.6B | $5.3B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $3.1B | $5.6B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.61x | 12.13x | 13.36x | 18.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.94x | 11.45x | 10.83x | 14.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.21x | 1.50x | 4.39x | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.11x | 9.49x | 10.12x | 11.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.31x | 2.36x | 3.64x | 1.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.49x | 1.28x | 1.36x | 3.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.58x | 11.39x | 12.53x | 19.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
THR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BDC delivers a 18.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $11 for TRMK. HOMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BDC's 1.17x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +10.8% | +10.9% | +18.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +1.2% | +2.0% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +7.1% | +7.2% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +3.2% | +9.8% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.53x | 0.30x | 1.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $112M | $448M | $292M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $668M | $910M | $390M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $152M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.25x | 0.75x | 1.44x | 6.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
THR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in THR five years ago would be worth $32,890 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,664 for HOMB. Over the past 12 months, THR leads with a +136.2% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors THR at 45.7% vs BDC's 11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +73.6% | +15.5% | -3.0% | -4.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +136.2% | +32.5% | -1.9% | +7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.1% | +118.5% | +42.0% | +40.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +228.9% | +47.6% | +6.6% | +109.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +251.9% | +127.7% | +58.2% | +91.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.7% | +29.8% | +12.4% | +11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THR's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs BDC's 70.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.92x | 0.81x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.24 | $45.99 | $30.83 | $159.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.86 | $33.39 | $25.68 | $103.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +97.6% | +87.1% | +70.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.2 | 56.0 | 50.3 | 38.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 553K | 392K | 1.4M | 379K |
Analyst Outlook
HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: THR as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", BDC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.7% upside for BDC (target: $150) vs -12.7% for THR (target: $57). For income investors, HOMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.79% vs BDC's 0.18%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $45.50 | $32.00 | $150.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 9 | 19 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | +2.8% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 21 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 | $0.75 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +3.0% | +1.6% | +5.0% |
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). THR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
THR vs TRMK vs HOMB vs BDC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is THR or TRMK or HOMB or BDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (THR). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (THR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — THR or TRMK or HOMB or BDC?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. at 41. 6x. On forward P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Belden Inc. wins at 0. 38x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — THR or TRMK or HOMB or BDC?
Over the past 5 years, Thermon Group Holdings, Inc.
(THR) delivered a total return of +228. 9%, compared to +6. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: THR returned +253. 8% versus HOMB's +57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — THR or TRMK or HOMB or BDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning THR is approximately 84% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 117% for Belden Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — THR or TRMK or HOMB or BDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus 0. 7% for Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (THR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Belden Inc. grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Trustmark Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, THR leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — THR or TRMK or HOMB or BDC?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 8. 7% for Belden Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus 12. 2% for BDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is THR or TRMK or HOMB or BDC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Belden Inc. (BDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. — 20. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BDC: 33. 7% to $150. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — THR or TRMK or HOMB or BDC?
In this comparison, HOMB (2.
8% yield), TRMK (2. 2% yield), BDC (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. THR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is THR or TRMK or HOMB or BDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +57. 7%, BDC: +91. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between THR and TRMK and HOMB and BDC?
These companies operate in different sectors (THR (Industrials) and TRMK (Financial Services) and HOMB (Financial Services) and BDC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: THR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BDC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TRMK, HOMB pay a dividend while THR, BDC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.