Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
THRY vs DSGN vs YELP vs FULC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Internet Content & Information
Biotechnology
THRY vs DSGN vs YELP vs FULC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Biotechnology | Internet Content & Information | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $164M | $881M | $1.69B | $372M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $771M | $0.00 | $1.47B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-70M | $139M | $-76M |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | — | 90.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | — | 12.4% | — |
| Forward P/E | 33.8x | — | 13.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $257M | $645K | $42M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $17M | $216M | $198M |
THRY vs DSGN vs YELP vs FULC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) | 100 | 15.9 | -84.1% |
| Design Therapeutics… (DSGN) | 100 | 47.2 | -52.8% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
| Fulcrum Therapeutic… (FULC) | 100 | 58.4 | -41.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: THRY vs DSGN vs YELP vs FULC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
THRY plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
DSGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +323.4% vs THRY's -72.2%
YELP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.82
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 19.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 10.2% 10Y total return vs FULC's -49.0%
- 3.7% revenue growth vs FULC's -100.0%
FULC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 27.40x
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 27.40x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs FULC's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.5% margin vs THRY's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs THRY's 2.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +323.4% vs THRY's -72.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.1% ROA vs DSGN's -31.3%, ROIC 25.1% vs -28.5% |
THRY vs DSGN vs YELP vs FULC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
THRY vs DSGN vs YELP vs FULC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
YELP leads in 2 of 6 categories
THRY leads 1 • DSGN leads 0 • FULC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YELP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YELP and FULC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. YELP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to THRY's 1.9%. On growth, YELP holds the edge at +0.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $771M | $0 | $1.5B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86M | -$78M | $236M | -$86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$70M | $139M | -$76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | -$54M | $281M | -$64M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | — | +90.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | — | +12.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | — | +9.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | — | +19.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | — | +0.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.5% | +6.5% | -16.7% | +10.7% |
Valuation Metrics
THRY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, YELP trades at a 98% valuation discount to THRY's 539.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, THRY's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than YELP's 6.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $164M | $881M | $1.7B | $372M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $410M | $864M | $1.5B | $181M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 539.13x | -11.56x | 12.71x | -5.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.82x | — | 13.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.30x | — | 6.18x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | — | 1.15x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 3.80x | 2.61x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.28x | — | 5.23x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-33 for DSGN. DSGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to THRY's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YELP scores 6/9 vs DSGN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | -33.1% | +19.7% | -27.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -31.3% | +14.1% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.6% | -28.5% | +25.1% | -36.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.6% | -34.8% | +22.9% | -28.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 0.00x | 0.06x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $246M | -$16M | -$174M | -$191M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $17M | $216M | $198M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $257M | $645,000 | $42M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.78x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DSGN and YELP and FULC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YELP five years ago would be worth $7,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,374 for THRY. Over the past 12 months, DSGN leads with a +323.4% total return vs THRY's -72.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULC at 30.7% vs THRY's -43.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.4% | +54.9% | -5.7% | -37.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.2% | +323.4% | -19.9% | +35.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | +85.5% | +1.6% | +123.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.3% | -49.7% | -27.9% | -34.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.5% | -66.0% | +10.2% | -49.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.4% | +22.9% | +0.5% | +30.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DSGN and YELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THRY's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DSGN currently trades 81.7% from its 52-week high vs THRY's 24.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.31x | 1.51x | 0.82x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.49 | $17.25 | $41.22 | $15.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.91 | $3.11 | $19.60 | $4.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.0% | +81.7% | +69.1% | +43.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 62.3 | 57.2 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 377K | 1.1M | 990K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: THRY as "Buy", DSGN as "Buy", YELP as "Hold", FULC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 200.4% upside for FULC (target: $21) vs -0.5% for YELP (target: $28).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $16.75 | $28.33 | $20.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 6 | 67 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% | +17.3% | 0.0% |
YELP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). THRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
THRY vs DSGN vs YELP vs FULC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is THRY or DSGN or YELP or FULC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC). Yelp Inc. (YELP) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — THRY or DSGN or YELP or FULC?
On trailing P/E, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the cheapest at 12. 7x versus Thryv Holdings, Inc. at 539. 1x. On forward P/E, Yelp Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — THRY or DSGN or YELP or FULC?
Over the past 5 years, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) delivered a total return of -27. 9%, compared to -86. 3% for Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YELP returned +10. 2% versus DSGN's -66. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — THRY or DSGN or YELP or FULC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Thryv Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 31β — meaning THRY is approximately 181% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Design Therapeutics, Inc. (DSGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 118% for Thryv Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — THRY or DSGN or YELP or FULC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -100. 0% for Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Thryv Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 100. 3% year-over-year, compared to -637. 5% for Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YELP leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — THRY or DSGN or YELP or FULC?
Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus 0. 0% for Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YELP leads at 12. 6% versus 0. 0% for FULC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YELP leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is THRY or DSGN or YELP or FULC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Thryv Holdings, Inc. — 20. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FULC: 200. 4% to $20. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — THRY or DSGN or YELP or FULC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is THRY or DSGN or YELP or FULC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YELP: +10. 2%, THRY: -57. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between THRY and DSGN and YELP and FULC?
These companies operate in different sectors (THRY (Communication Services) and DSGN (Healthcare) and YELP (Communication Services) and FULC (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: THRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DSGN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.