Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) vs Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HOOD | 58.2% revenue growth vs TIGR's 43.7% |
| Value | TIGR | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 31.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | HOOD | 47.8% net margin vs TIGR's 15.5% |
| Stability / Safety | TIGR | Beta 1.28 vs HOOD's 2.62, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | HOOD | +51.4% vs TIGR's +8.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HOOD | 4.9% ROA vs TIGR's 1.4%, ROIC 6.2% vs 13.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
UP Fintech is an online brokerage platform primarily serving Chinese investors who want to trade global securities. It generates revenue mainly from brokerage commissions on stock and options trades — supplemented by margin financing fees and value-added services like investor education. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on the Chinese diaspora market and its technology platform that simplifies access to international markets.
Robinhood is a mobile-first financial services platform that enables commission-free trading of stocks, ETFs, options, and cryptocurrencies. It generates revenue primarily from payment for order flow — earning fees from market makers for routing trades — along with margin lending, subscription services, and interest on customer cash balances. Its key advantage is a user-friendly interface that democratized investing for retail customers, creating strong network effects through its social features and educational content.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HOOD leads in 2 (Financial Metrics, Total Returns).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
HOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 7.5x TIGR's $392M. HOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 47.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIGR's 15.5%.
| Metric | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… | HOODRobinhood Markets… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $392M | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $225M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $118M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $673M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +82.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +35.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +47.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | -34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, TIGR trades at a 55% valuation discount to HOOD's 48.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TIGR's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOOD's 62.0x.
| Metric | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… | HOODRobinhood Markets… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $763M | $67.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $549M | $70.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.72x | 48.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.69x | 31.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.72x | 61.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.95x | 22.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.00x | 8.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.92x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOOD delivers a 20.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $15 for TIGR. TIGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOOD's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs HOOD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… | HOODRobinhood Markets… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.5% | +20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.8% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.7% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$214M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $394M | $4.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $180M | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.26x | 95.77x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth $21,783 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,042 for TIGR. Over the past 12 months, HOOD leads with a +51.4% total return vs TIGR's +8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 96.0% vs TIGR's 28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… | HOODRobinhood Markets… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.1% | -34.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.0% | +51.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.7% | +653.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.6% | +117.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | +117.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.0% | +96.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TIGR is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOOD's 2.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TIGR currently trades 57.7% from its 52-week high vs HOOD's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… | HOODRobinhood Markets… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 2.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.55 | $153.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.38 | $29.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.7% | +49.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.1 | 41.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 23.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TIGR as "Sell" and HOOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 75.1% upside for HOOD (target: $133) vs 27.1% for TIGR (target: $10).
| Metric | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… | HOODRobinhood Markets… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.94 | $132.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Aug 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 48.33 | -51.7% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | 108.21 | 258.21 | +138.6% |
Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) returned +118% over 5 years vs UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR)'s -70%. A $10,000 investment in HOOD 5 years ago would be worth $21,783 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | $5M | $392M | +7050.3% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | $278M | $3.0B | +963.3% |
UP Fintech Holding Limited's revenue grew from $5M (2016) to $392M (2024) — a 70.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | -196.5% | 15.5% | +107.9% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | -38.4% | 47.8% | +224.5% |
UP Fintech Holding Limited's net margin went from -196% (2016) to 16% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2020 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 72.2 | 17.9 | -75.2% |
UP Fintech Holding Limited has traded in a 18x–72x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~22x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | -0.1 | 0.36 | +460.4% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | -0.13 | 1.56 | +1344.0% |
UP Fintech Holding Limited's EPS grew from $-0.10 (2016) to $0.36 (2024).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
UP Fintech Holding Limited generated $826M FCF in 2024 (+102% vs 2021). Robinhood Markets, Inc. generated $-170M FCF in 2024 (+82% vs 2021).
TIGR vs HOOD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TIGR or HOOD a better buy right now?
UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 21.7x trailing P/E (7.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TIGR or HOOD?
On trailing P/E, UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) is the cheapest at 21.7x versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. at 48.6x. On forward P/E, UP Fintech Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 7.7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TIGR or HOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) delivered a total return of +117.8%, compared to -69.6% for UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth approximately $22K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOOD returned +117.8% versus TIGR's -27.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TIGR or HOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.28β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s 2.62β — meaning HOOD is approximately 105% more volatile than TIGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 94% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — TIGR or HOOD?
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 47.8% net margin versus 15.5% for UP Fintech Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 47.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOOD leads at 35.8% versus 35.6% for TIGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOOD leads at 82.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TIGR or HOOD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) trades at 7.7x forward P/E versus 31.6x for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — 24.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOOD: 75.1% to $132.80.
07Which pays a better dividend — TIGR or HOOD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TIGR or HOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.28)). Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) carries a higher beta of 2.62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TIGR: -27.2%, HOOD: +117.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TIGR and HOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.