Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) vs Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHOOD58.2% revenue growth vs TIGR's 43.7%
ValueTIGRLower P/E (7.7x vs 31.6x)
Quality / MarginsHOOD47.8% net margin vs TIGR's 15.5%
Stability / SafetyTIGRBeta 1.28 vs HOOD's 2.62, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HOOD+51.4% vs TIGR's +8.0%
Efficiency (ROA)HOOD4.9% ROA vs TIGR's 1.4%, ROIC 6.2% vs 13.8%
Bottom line: HOOD leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. UP Fintech Holding Limited is the better choice for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

TIGRUP Fintech Holding Limited
Financial Services

UP Fintech is an online brokerage platform primarily serving Chinese investors who want to trade global securities. It generates revenue mainly from brokerage commissions on stock and options trades — supplemented by margin financing fees and value-added services like investor education. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on the Chinese diaspora market and its technology platform that simplifies access to international markets.

HOODRobinhood Markets, Inc.
Financial Services

Robinhood is a mobile-first financial services platform that enables commission-free trading of stocks, ETFs, options, and cryptocurrencies. It generates revenue primarily from payment for order flow — earning fees from market makers for routing trades — along with margin lending, subscription services, and interest on customer cash balances. Its key advantage is a user-friendly interface that democratized investing for retail customers, creating strong network effects through its social features and educational content.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TIGRUP Fintech Holding Limited
FY 2024
Interests Income
49.0%$192M
Commissions
40.6%$159M
Product and Service, Other
7.5%$29M
Financing Service
2.9%$11M
HOODRobinhood Markets, Inc.
FY 2024
Transaction-Based Revenues
89.4%$1.6B
Gold Subscription Revenues
5.9%$109M
Proxy Revenues
3.3%$60M
Other Revenue
1.4%$26M

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

TIGR 3HOOD 2
Financial MetricsHOOD3/5 metrics
Valuation MetricsTIGR5/5 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyTIGR6/9 metrics
Total ReturnsHOOD5/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityTIGR2/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HOOD leads in 2 (Financial Metrics, Total Returns).

Financial Metrics (TTM)

HOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 7.5x TIGR's $392M. HOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 47.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIGR's 15.5%.

MetricTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOODRobinhood Markets…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$392M$3.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$225M$2.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$118M$1.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$673M$1.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.0%+82.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.6%+35.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.5%+47.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.1%-5.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.4%-34.6%
HOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 21.7x trailing earnings, TIGR trades at a 55% valuation discount to HOOD's 48.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TIGR's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOOD's 62.0x.

MetricTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOODRobinhood Markets…
Market CapShares × price$763M$67.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$549M$70.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.72x48.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.69x31.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.72x61.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.95x22.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.00x8.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.92x
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HOOD delivers a 20.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $15 for TIGR. TIGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOOD's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs HOOD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOODRobinhood Markets…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+15.5%+20.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+4.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.8%+6.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+18.7%+14.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.27x0.94x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$214M$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$394M$4.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$180M$7.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.26x95.77x
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth $21,783 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,042 for TIGR. Over the past 12 months, HOOD leads with a +51.4% total return vs TIGR's +8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 96.0% vs TIGR's 28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOODRobinhood Markets…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-25.1%-34.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+8.0%+51.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+109.7%+653.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.6%+117.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.2%+117.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+28.0%+96.0%
HOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TIGR is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOOD's 2.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TIGR currently trades 57.7% from its 52-week high vs HOOD's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOODRobinhood Markets…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.28x2.62x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.55$153.86
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.38$29.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+57.7%+49.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.141.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.8M23.8M
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates TIGR as "Sell" and HOOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 75.1% upside for HOOD (target: $133) vs 27.1% for TIGR (target: $10).

MetricTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOODRobinhood Markets…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellSellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.94$132.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts423
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockAug 21Feb 26Change
UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR)10048.33-51.7%
Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD)108.21258.21+138.6%

Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) returned +118% over 5 years vs UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR)'s -70%. A $10,000 investment in HOOD 5 years ago would be worth $21,783 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162024Change
UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR)$5M$392M+7050.3%
Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD)$278M$3.0B+963.3%

UP Fintech Holding Limited's revenue grew from $5M (2016) to $392M (2024) — a 70.5% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162024Change
UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR)-196.5%15.5%+107.9%
Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD)-38.4%47.8%+224.5%

UP Fintech Holding Limited's net margin went from -196% (2016) to 16% (2024).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years

Stock20202024Change
UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR)72.217.9-75.2%

UP Fintech Holding Limited has traded in a 18x–72x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~22x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162024Change
UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR)-0.10.36+460.4%
Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD)-0.131.56+1344.0%

UP Fintech Holding Limited's EPS grew from $-0.10 (2016) to $0.36 (2024).

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$408M
$-968M
2022
$253M
$-909M
2023
$-9M
$1B
2024
$826M
$-170M
UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR)Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD)

UP Fintech Holding Limited generated $826M FCF in 2024 (+102% vs 2021). Robinhood Markets, Inc. generated $-170M FCF in 2024 (+82% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

TIGR vs HOOD: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TIGR or HOOD a better buy right now?

UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 21.7x trailing P/E (7.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TIGR or HOOD?

On trailing P/E, UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) is the cheapest at 21.7x versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. at 48.6x. On forward P/E, UP Fintech Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 7.7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TIGR or HOOD?

Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) delivered a total return of +117.8%, compared to -69.6% for UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth approximately $22K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOOD returned +117.8% versus TIGR's -27.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TIGR or HOOD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.28β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s 2.62β — meaning HOOD is approximately 105% more volatile than TIGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 94% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — TIGR or HOOD?

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 47.8% net margin versus 15.5% for UP Fintech Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 47.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOOD leads at 35.8% versus 35.6% for TIGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOOD leads at 82.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is TIGR or HOOD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) trades at 7.7x forward P/E versus 31.6x for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — 24.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOOD: 75.1% to $132.80.

07

Which pays a better dividend — TIGR or HOOD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is TIGR or HOOD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.28)). Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) carries a higher beta of 2.62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TIGR: -27.2%, HOOD: +117.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between TIGR and HOOD?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

📈
Stocks Like

TIGR

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
🚀
Stocks Like

HOOD

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Net Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat TIGR and HOOD on the metrics you choose

Net Margin>
%
(TIGR: 15.5% · HOOD: 47.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TIGR: 21.7x · HOOD: 48.6x)