Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TIGR vs HOOD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$676M
5Y Perf.-56.6%
HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$71.21B
5Y Perf.+124.9%

TIGR vs HOOD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TIGR logoTIGR
HOOD logoHOOD
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$676M$71.21B
Revenue (TTM)$392M$4.47B
Net Income (TTM)$118M$1.90B
Gross Margin65.0%83.3%
Operating Margin35.6%46.8%
Forward P/E7.3x41.9x
Total Debt$180M$15.41B
Cash & Equiv.$394M$4.26B

TIGR vs HOODLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TIGR
HOOD
StockJul 21May 26Return
UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR)10043.4-56.6%
Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD)100224.9+124.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TIGR vs HOOD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TIGR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Robinhood Markets, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
The Banking Pick

TIGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 2.02
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.02, Low D/E 27.1%, current ratio 1.14x
  • Beta 2.02, current ratio 1.14x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOOD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 51.6%, EPS growth 31.4%
  • 127.0% 10Y total return vs TIGR's -35.3%
  • 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs TIGR's 43.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHOOD logoHOOD51.6% NII/revenue growth vs TIGR's 43.7%
ValueTIGR logoTIGRLower P/E (7.3x vs 41.9x)
Quality / MarginsTIGR logoTIGREfficiency ratio 0.3% vs HOOD's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyTIGR logoTIGRBeta 2.02 vs HOOD's 3.05, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HOOD logoHOOD+62.4% vs TIGR's -25.6%
Efficiency (ROA)TIGR logoTIGREfficiency ratio 0.3% vs HOOD's 0.4%

TIGR vs HOOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
FY 2024
Interests Income
49.0%$192M
Commissions
40.6%$159M
Product and Service, Other
7.5%$29M
Financing Service
2.9%$11M
HOODRobinhood Markets, Inc.
FY 2025
Transaction-Based Revenues
88.8%$2.6B
Gold Subscription Revenues
6.0%$179M
Other Revenue
3.0%$89M
Proxy Revenues
2.1%$63M

TIGR vs HOOD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTIGRLAGGINGHOOD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

HOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.5B annually — 11.4x TIGR's $392M. HOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 42.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIGR's 15.5%.

MetricTIGR logoTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOOD logoHOODRobinhood Markets…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$392M$4.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$225M$2.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$118M$1.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$673M$2.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.0%+83.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.6%+46.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.5%+42.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.1%+36.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.4%+2.7%
HOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 19.3x trailing earnings, TIGR trades at a 50% valuation discount to HOOD's 38.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TIGR's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOOD's 37.8x.

MetricTIGR logoTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOOD logoHOODRobinhood Markets…
Market CapShares × price$676M$71.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$462M$82.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS19.25x38.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.32x41.94x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.13x37.78x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.73x15.92x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.77x7.94x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.82x43.88x
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HOOD delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $18 for TIGR. TIGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOOD's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs HOOD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTIGR logoTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOOD logoHOODRobinhood Markets…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.6%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.8%+7.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+18.7%+24.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.27x1.68x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$214M$11.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$394M$4.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$180M$15.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.26x97.05x
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth $22,702 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,043 for TIGR. Over the past 12 months, HOOD leads with a +62.4% total return vs TIGR's -25.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 107.0% vs TIGR's 33.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTIGR logoTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOOD logoHOODRobinhood Markets…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-33.6%-31.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-25.6%+62.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+139.0%+787.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.6%+127.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-35.3%+127.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+33.7%+107.0%
HOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TIGR and HOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TIGR is the less volatile stock with a 2.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOOD's 3.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricTIGR logoTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOOD logoHOODRobinhood Markets…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.02x3.05x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.55$153.86
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.95$45.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+51.1%+51.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.048.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.3M29.7M
Evenly matched — TIGR and HOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates TIGR as "Sell" and HOOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.2% upside for HOOD (target: $117) vs -31.7% for TIGR (target: $5).

MetricTIGR logoTIGRUP Fintech Holdin…HOOD logoHOODRobinhood Markets…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellSellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.73$117.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts425
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TIGR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallUP Fintech Holding Ltd. Spo… (TIGR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TIGR vs HOOD: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TIGR or HOOD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 43. 7% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TIGR or HOOD?

On trailing P/E, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.

Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the cheapest at 19. 3x versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. at 38. 6x. On forward P/E, UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A is actually cheaper at 7. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TIGR or HOOD?

Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) delivered a total return of +127. 0%, compared to -59. 6% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOOD returned +127. 0% versus TIGR's -35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TIGR or HOOD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.

Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 02β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning HOOD is approximately 51% more volatile than TIGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 168% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TIGR or HOOD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus 43. 7% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to 31. 4% for Robinhood Markets, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TIGR or HOOD?

Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus 15. 5% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOOD leads at 46. 8% versus 35. 6% for TIGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOOD leads at 83. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TIGR or HOOD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.

Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — 34. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOOD: 48. 2% to $117. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TIGR or HOOD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is TIGR or HOOD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+127. 0% 10Y return). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOOD: +127. 0%, TIGR: -35. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TIGR and HOOD?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TIGR

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOOD

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TIGR and HOOD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TIGR: 43.7% · HOOD: 51.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(TIGR: 15.5% · HOOD: 42.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TIGR: 19.3x · HOOD: 38.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.