TKLF
Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.
Household & Personal Products
Market Cap$887K
5Y Perf.-95.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TKLF vs KOSS vs AMZN vs CANG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KOSS
Koss Corporation
Consumer Electronics
Market Cap$40M
5Y Perf.-49.9%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+81.3%
CANG
Cango Inc.
Auto - Dealerships
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-67.5%
TKLF vs KOSS vs AMZN vs CANG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TKLF | KOSS | AMZN | CANG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Consumer Electronics | Specialty Retail | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $887K | $40M | $2.92T | $250M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $390M | $13M | $742.78B | $3.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.00B | $-871K | $90.80B | $-178M |
| Gross Margin | 11.4% | 36.4% | 50.6% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | -15.8% | 11.5% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | — | 34.8x | 5.7x |
| Total Debt | $10.69B | $3M | $152.99B | $170M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $721M | $3M | $86.81B | $1.29B |
TKLF vs KOSS vs AMZN vs CANG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TKLF
KOSS
AMZN
CANG
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokyo Lifestyle Co.… (TKLF) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Koss Corporation (KOSS) | 100 | 50.1 | -49.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 181.3 | +81.3% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 32.5 | -67.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TKLF vs KOSS vs AMZN vs CANG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TKLF and AMZN are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TKLF
Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.
The Growth Play
TKLF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 159.7%, EPS growth 152.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 411.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.76, current ratio 1.35x
- 159.7% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
KOSS
Koss Corporation
The Specific-Use Pick
KOSS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: technology exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs KOSS's 91.0%
- 12.2% margin vs KOSS's -6.8%
- +43.7% vs CANG's -73.7%
- 11.5% ROA vs KOSS's -2.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -4.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Income Pick
CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 2.25
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TKLF | 159.7% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% |
| Value | TKLF | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 5.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs KOSS's -6.8% |
| Stability / Safety | TKLF | Beta 0.76 vs CANG's 2.25 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +43.7% vs CANG's -73.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs KOSS's -2.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -4.2% |
TKLF vs KOSS vs AMZN vs CANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2024
TKLF vs KOSS vs AMZN vs CANG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGKOSS
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories
TKLF leads 1 • CANG leads 1 • KOSS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓KOSSKoss Corporation
0leads
CANGCango Inc.
1leads
TKLFTokyo Lifestyle Co., …
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TKLFvs CANGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMZN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TKLF3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CANG1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 58041.3x KOSS's $13M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KOSS's -6.8%. On growth, TKLF holds the edge at +256.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | KOSSKoss Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. | CANGCango Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $390M | $13M | $742.8B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | -$2M | $155.9B | $333M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | -$871,116 | $90.8B | -$178M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$237M | -$546,651 | -$2.5B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +36.4% | +50.6% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | -15.8% | +11.5% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | -6.8% | +12.2% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | -4.3% | -0.3% | -154.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +256.9% | -19.6% | +16.6% | +58.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2135.4% | — | +74.8% | +3.6% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TKLF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, TKLF trades at a 100% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.5x.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | KOSSKoss Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. | CANGCango Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $886,624 | $40M | $2.92T | $250M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.0B | $39M | $2.98T | $85M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -44.78x | 37.82x | 5.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 34.77x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | — | 1.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.63x | — | 20.47x | 3.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 3.14x | 4.07x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.28x | 7.14x | 0.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 378.98x | — |
TKLF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TKLF's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | KOSSKoss Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. | CANGCango Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.5% | -2.8% | +23.3% | -4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | -2.3% | +11.5% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | -4.2% | +14.7% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | -4.9% | +15.3% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.08x | 0.37x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.0B | -$266,063 | $66.2B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $721M | $3M | $86.8B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.7B | $3M | $153.0B | $170M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.77x | -1972.72x | 39.96x | -1.87x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $71 for TKLF. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs TKLF's -46.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | KOSSKoss Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. | CANGCango Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.1% | -3.6% | +19.7% | -62.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.9% | -10.6% | +43.7% | -73.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | +5.3% | +156.2% | +1.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -75.7% | +64.8% | -14.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +91.0% | +697.8% | -44.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.3% | +1.7% | +36.8% | +0.4% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TKLF and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TKLF is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | KOSSKoss Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. | CANGCango Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.62x | 1.51x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.32 | $8.59 | $278.56 | $2.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.95 | $3.50 | $185.01 | $0.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.6% | +48.7% | +97.3% | +18.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 55.2 | 81.1 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 23K | 45.5M | 1.3M |
Evenly matched — TKLF and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMZN as "Buy", CANG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | KOSSKoss Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. | CANGCango Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $306.77 | $3.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 94 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.3% |
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TKLF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TKLF vs KOSS vs AMZN vs CANG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TKLF or KOSS or AMZN or CANG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is the stronger pick with 159. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Tokyo Lifestyle Co. , Ltd. (TKLF) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TKLF or KOSS or AMZN or CANG?
On trailing P/E, Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TKLF or KOSS or AMZN or CANG?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -99. 3% for Tokyo Lifestyle Co. , Ltd. (TKLF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus TKLF's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TKLF or KOSS or AMZN or CANG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 195% more volatile than TKLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 166% for Tokyo Lifestyle Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TKLF or KOSS or AMZN or CANG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is pulling ahead at 159. 7% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tokyo Lifestyle Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 152. 2% year-over-year, compared to 6. 6% for Koss Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKLF leads at 411. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TKLF or KOSS or AMZN or CANG?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -6. 9% for Koss Corporation — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -13. 8% for KOSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TKLF or KOSS or AMZN or CANG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459.
2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TKLF or KOSS or AMZN or CANG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TKLF or KOSS or AMZN or CANG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76)). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKLF: -99. 3%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TKLF and KOSS and AMZN and CANG?
These companies operate in different sectors (TKLF (Consumer Defensive) and KOSS (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TKLF is a small-cap high-growth stock; KOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TKLF: 25694.5% · KOSS: -19.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.