Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TLK vs PHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
TLK vs PHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $16.84B | $4.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $147.37T | $218.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21.72T | $30.02B |
| Gross Margin | 66.7% | 71.6% |
| Operating Margin | 27.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 0.1x |
| Total Debt | $76.83T | $359.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33.91T | $11.86B |
TLK vs PHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perusahaan Perseroa… (TLK) | 100 | 79.6 | -20.4% |
| PLDT Inc. (PHI) | 100 | 83.3 | -16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TLK vs PHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TLK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 47.3%, current ratio 0.82x
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x)
- 14.7% margin vs PHI's 13.7%
PHI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 7.9%
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth -5.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
- 7.8% 10Y total return vs TLK's -4.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs TLK's 0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.7% margin vs PHI's 13.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs TLK's 0.77 | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs PHI's 7.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.6% vs PHI's -7.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs PHI's 4.8%, ROIC 16.1% vs 9.1% |
TLK vs PHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TLK vs PHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TLK and PHI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.37T annually — 674.5x PHI's $218.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.7% (TLK) to 13.7% (PHI).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $147.37T | $218.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $73.14T | $108.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21.72T | $30.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40.12T | $35.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.7% | +71.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.9% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.7% | +17.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TLK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, PHI trades at a 30% valuation discount to TLK's 12.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TLK's 4.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PHI's 5.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.8B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.3B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.41x | 8.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.00x | 0.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.45x | 5.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 1.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 2.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.19x | 11.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TLK and PHI each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PHI delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $14 for TLK. TLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PHI's 2.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PHI scores 5/9 vs TLK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.6% | +12.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 2.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42.93T | $347.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $33.91T | $11.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76.83T | $359.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.52x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PHI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PHI five years ago would be worth $11,163 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,846 for TLK. Over the past 12 months, TLK leads with a +16.6% total return vs PHI's -7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PHI at 5.2% vs TLK's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.4% | -3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.6% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.2% | +16.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | +11.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.4% | +7.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.6% | +5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
PHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TLK's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PHI currently trades 83.0% from its 52-week high vs TLK's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.52 | $24.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.56 | $18.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.3% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.7 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 808K | 137K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TLK and PHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TLK as "Hold" and PHI as "Hold". For income investors, PHI offers the higher dividend yield at 7.87% vs TLK's 6.03%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.0% | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $17850.40 | $97.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). TLK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
TLK vs PHI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TLK or PHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK). PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TLK or PHI?
On trailing P/E, PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk at 12. 4x. On forward P/E, Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TLK or PHI?
Over the past 5 years, PLDT Inc.
(PHI) delivered a total return of +11. 6%, compared to -1. 5% for Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PHI returned +7. 8% versus TLK's -4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TLK or PHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk's 0. 77β — meaning TLK is approximately 263% more volatile than PHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 3% for PLDT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TLK or PHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus 0. 5% for Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk grew EPS -3. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for PLDT Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PHI leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TLK or PHI?
Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 13. 7% for PLDT Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TLK leads at 28. 7% versus 24. 9% for PHI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLK leads at 67. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TLK or PHI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) trades at 0.
0x forward P/E versus 0. 1x for PLDT Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TLK or PHI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the highest yield at 7. 9%, versus 6. 0% for Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK).
09Is TLK or PHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 7. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHI: +7. 8%, TLK: -4. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TLK and PHI?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.