TLSA
Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd
Biotechnology
Market Cap$187M
5Y Perf.-44.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TLSA vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$1721.78T
5Y Perf.-58.6%
TLSA vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TLSA | DBVT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $187M | $1721.78T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $-168M |
| Total Debt | $106K | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $194M |
TLSA vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TLSA
DBVT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tiziana Life Scienc… (TLSA) | 100 | 55.5 | -44.5% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TLSA vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TLSA leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. DBV Technologies S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TLSA
Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd
The Income Pick
TLSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.74
- EPS growth 35.3%
- -64.7% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -86.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Momentum Pick
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum and efficiency.
- +114.1% vs TLSA's -2.0%
- -89.0% ROA vs TLSA's -303.2%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TLSA | -57.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | TLSA | 7.2% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% |
| Stability / Safety | TLSA | Beta 0.74 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DBVT | +114.1% vs TLSA's -2.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DBVT | -89.0% ROA vs TLSA's -303.2% |
TLSA vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDBVTLAGGINGTLSA
TLSATiziana Life Sciences…
1leads
DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TLSAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
DBVT1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DBVT6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TLSA4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TLSA and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | TLSATiziana Life Scie… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$40M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.8% | +91.5% |
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TLSA and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TLSATiziana Life Scie… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $187M | $1721.78T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $183M | $1721.78T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.68x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.92x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — TLSA and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DBVT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DBVT delivers a -130.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-130 in annual profit, vs $-9 for TLSA. TLSA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBVT scores 4/9 vs TLSA's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | TLSATiziana Life Scie… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.7% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.8% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $106,000 | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2622.00x | -189.82x |
DBVT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TLSA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TLSA five years ago would be worth $6,203 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,344 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +114.1% total return vs TLSA's -2.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TLSA at 22.5% vs DBVT's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TLSATiziana Life Scie… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.1% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.0% | +114.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.8% | +20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.0% | -66.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.7% | -86.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.5% | +6.4% |
TLSA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TLSA and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TLSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DBVT currently trades 76.8% from its 52-week high vs TLSA's 56.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TLSATiziana Life Scie… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.14 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.5% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 149K | 253K |
Evenly matched — TLSA and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TLSA as "Buy" and DBVT as "Buy".
| Metric | TLSATiziana Life Scie… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
DBVT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TLSA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallDBV Technologies S.A. (DBVT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TLSA vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TLSA or DBVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TLSA or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) delivered a total return of -38.
0%, compared to -66. 6% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TLSA returned -64. 7% versus DBVT's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TLSA or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 70% more volatile than TLSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TLSA or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd grew EPS 35.
3% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TLSA or DBVT?
Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TLSA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLSA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TLSA or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TLSA or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TLSA: -64. 7%, DBVT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TLSA and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.