Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TMDX vs AVXL vs NVCR vs SAVA vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
TMDX vs AVXL vs NVCR vs SAVA vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.52B | $289M | $1.92B | $94M | $3.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $636M | $0.00 | $674M | $0.00 | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $172M | $-40M | $-173M | $-106M | $376M |
| Gross Margin | 59.1% | — | 75.2% | — | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | — | -27.2% | — | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | 29.9x | — | — | — | 50.9x |
| Total Debt | $470M | $0.00 | $290M | $0.00 | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $488M | $103M | $103M | $129M | $178M |
TMDX vs AVXL vs NVCR vs SAVA vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransMedics Group, … (TMDX) | 100 | 551.9 | +451.9% |
| Anavex Life Science… (AVXL) | 100 | 75.9 | -24.1% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Cassava Sciences, I… (SAVA) | 100 | 745.8 | +645.8% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TMDX vs AVXL vs NVCR vs SAVA vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TMDX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 382.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.4%
- 226.0% 10Y total return vs SAVA's -19.5%
- 37.1% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4%
- Lower P/E (29.9x vs 50.9x)
AVXL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 11.60x
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, SAVA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.26
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- 34.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
- Beta 1.26 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.9x vs 50.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.4% vs AVXL's -63.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs SAVA's -75.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -6.3% |
TMDX vs AVXL vs NVCR vs SAVA vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TMDX vs AVXL vs NVCR vs SAVA vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TMDX leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACAD leads 1 • AVXL leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • SAVA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and SAVA operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, TMDX holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $636M | $0 | $674M | $0 | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $115M | -$30M | -$165M | -$110M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $172M | -$40M | -$173M | -$106M | $376M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $151M | -$34M | -$48M | -$84M | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.1% | — | +75.2% | — | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | — | -27.2% | — | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | — | -25.7% | — | +34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | — | -7.1% | — | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | — | +12.3% | — | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.4% | +54.4% | -100.0% | +62.1% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TMDX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 34% valuation discount to TMDX's 15.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TMDX's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $289M | $1.9B | $94M | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $187M | $2.1B | -$34M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.97x | -5.78x | -13.80x | -3.76x | 9.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.86x | — | — | — | 50.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.42x | — | — | — | 26.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | — | 2.92x | — | 3.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.25x | 2.81x | 5.51x | 0.63x | 3.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.86x | — | — | — | 36.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-96 for SAVA. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMDX's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMDX scores 7/9 vs SAVA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.9% | -31.5% | -50.8% | -95.8% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.8% | -30.0% | -16.5% | -75.3% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.8% | — | -16.4% | -6.3% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | -47.8% | -28.9% | -99.9% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | — | 0.85x | — | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | -$103M | $187M | -$129M | -$126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $488M | $103M | $103M | $129M | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $470M | $0 | $290M | $0 | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 33.15x | — | -96.80x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMDX five years ago would be worth $30,074 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, ACAD leads with a +52.4% total return vs AVXL's -63.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACAD at 1.5% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.6% | -15.2% | +28.3% | -6.5% | -13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.9% | -63.2% | +1.1% | +25.3% | +52.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.8% | -62.9% | -75.7% | -40.8% | +4.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | -72.4% | -91.3% | -67.0% | +7.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +226.0% | -25.7% | +30.3% | -19.5% | -22.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.9% | -28.1% | -37.6% | -16.0% | +1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs AVXL's 22.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.51x | 2.20x | 2.02x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $156.00 | $13.99 | $20.06 | $4.98 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.00 | $2.61 | $9.82 | $1.51 | $14.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.7% | +22.3% | +83.9% | +39.3% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.8 | 47.0 | 69.8 | 46.8 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.4M | 1.5M | 712K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TMDX as "Buy", AVXL as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", SAVA as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 252.6% upside for AVXL (target: $11) vs 54.1% for ACAD (target: $35).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $144.75 | $11.00 | $33.50 | — | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 13 | 15 | 12 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TMDX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACAD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
TMDX vs AVXL vs NVCR vs SAVA vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TMDX or AVXL or NVCR or SAVA or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TMDX or AVXL or NVCR or SAVA or ACAD?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus TransMedics Group, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, TransMedics Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TMDX or AVXL or NVCR or SAVA or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) delivered a total return of +200. 7%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMDX returned +226. 0% versus AVXL's -25. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TMDX or AVXL or NVCR or SAVA or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 75% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 99% for TransMedics Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TMDX or AVXL or NVCR or SAVA or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransMedics Group, Inc. grew EPS 382. 2% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Anavex Life Sciences Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMDX leads at 86. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TMDX or AVXL or NVCR or SAVA or ACAD?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMDX leads at 17. 9% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TMDX or AVXL or NVCR or SAVA or ACAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) trades at 29. 9x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 21. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVXL: 252. 6% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TMDX or AVXL or NVCR or SAVA or ACAD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TMDX or AVXL or NVCR or SAVA or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACAD: -22. 9%, SAVA: -19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TMDX and AVXL and NVCR and SAVA and ACAD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TMDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.