Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TNK vs XOM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.76B
5Y Perf.+356.7%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$629.60B
5Y Perf.+226.7%

TNK vs XOM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TNK logoTNK
XOM logoXOM
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$2.76B$629.60B
Revenue (TTM)$952M$323.90B
Net Income (TTM)$351M$28.84B
Gross Margin27.5%21.7%
Operating Margin27.5%10.5%
Forward P/E5.9x15.0x
Total Debt$55M$43.54B
Cash & Equiv.$831M$10.68B

TNK vs XOMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TNK
XOM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)100456.7+356.7%
Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM)100326.7+226.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TNK vs XOM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TNK leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Exxon Mobil Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder

TNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 200.7% 10Y total return vs XOM's 107.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
  • Beta 0.35, yield 2.5%, current ratio 7.98x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Income Pick

XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.7%
  • Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
  • -4.5% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthXOM logoXOM-4.5% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
ValueTNK logoTNKLower P/E (5.9x vs 15.0x)
Quality / MarginsTNK logoTNK36.9% margin vs XOM's 8.9%
Stability / SafetyTNK logoTNKLower D/E ratio (2.7% vs 16.3%)
DividendsXOM logoXOM2.7% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs TNK's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)TNK logoTNK+76.4% vs XOM's +45.7%
Efficiency (ROA)TNK logoTNK15.7% ROA vs XOM's 6.4%, ROIC 12.5% vs 8.6%

TNK vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage charters
59.3%$1.1B
Voyage Charters - Suezmax
30.4%$547M
Other revenue
7.6%$136M
Time-charter
1.4%$26M
Time Charters - Suezmax
0.7%$13M
Ship-to-ship support services, Other revenue
0.6%$11M
XOMExxon Mobil Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Products
68.7%$217.8B
Upstream
17.6%$55.7B
Chemical Products
6.0%$18.9B
Specialty Products
5.4%$17.3B
Income From Equity Affiliates
1.7%$5.3B
Other Revenue
0.6%$2.1B

TNK vs XOM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTNKLAGGINGXOM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 340.3x TNK's $952M. TNK is the more profitable business, keeping 36.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XOM's 8.9%. On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$952M$323.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$348M$59.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$351M$28.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$113M$23.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.5%+21.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.5%+10.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+36.9%+8.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.8%+7.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-26.4%-1.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+46.0%-11.0%
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.9x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 65% valuation discount to XOM's 22.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TNK's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 11.1x.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Market CapShares × price$2.8B$629.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.0B$662.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.86x22.17x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.86x15.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.25x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.58x11.05x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.90x1.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.35x2.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.50x26.66x
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TNK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XOM's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TNK scores 4/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.2%+10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.7%+6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.5%+8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.9%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$776M$32.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$831M$10.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$55M$43.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense109.95x69.44x
TNK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,387 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $27,178 for XOM. Over the past 12 months, TNK leads with a +76.4% total return vs XOM's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNK at 32.3% vs XOM's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+54.6%+22.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+76.4%+45.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+131.4%+46.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+513.9%+171.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+200.7%+107.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.3%+13.7%
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TNK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TNK's 0.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TNK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x-0.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$83.54$176.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$41.05$101.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.0%+84.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.153.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded547K18.8M
Evenly matched — TNK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates TNK as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs 8.0% for XOM (target: $160). For income investors, XOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.69% vs TNK's 2.50%.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$90.00$160.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts2355
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises026
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.98$4.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.2%
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TNK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XOM leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallTeekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TNK vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TNK or XOM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TNK or XOM?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TNK or XOM?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 9%, compared to +171. 8% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TNK returned +200. 7% versus XOM's +107. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TNK or XOM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus Teekay Tankers Ltd. 's 0. 35β — meaning TNK is approximately -340% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 16% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TNK or XOM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.

5% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TNK or XOM?

Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TNK leads at 22. 6% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TNK leads at 27. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TNK or XOM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 13. 4% to $90. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TNK or XOM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 2. 5% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).

09

Is TNK or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, TNK: +200. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TNK and XOM?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TNK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XOM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TNK and XOM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TNK: -26.4% · XOM: -1.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(TNK: 36.9% · XOM: 8.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TNK: 7.9x · XOM: 22.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.