Travel Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TNL vs H
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
TNL vs H — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $4.06B | $16.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.05B | $6.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $237M | $-34M |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 17.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 52.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.91B | $4.80B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $253M | $788M |
TNL vs H — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) | 100 | 204.3 | +104.3% |
| Hyatt Hotels Corpor… (H) | 100 | 307.4 | +207.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNL vs H
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 1.31, yield 3.4%, current ratio 1.64x
H is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 117.0%, EPS growth -104.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.8%
- 254.3% 10Y total return vs TNL's 156.2%
- 117.0% revenue growth vs TNL's 4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 117.0% revenue growth vs TNL's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 52.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs H's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs H's 1.39 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs H's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.6% vs H's +39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs H's -0.2%, ROIC 13.0% vs 5.8% |
TNL vs H — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TNL vs H — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
H is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 1.5x TNL's $4.0B. TNL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to H's -0.5%. On growth, H holds the edge at +108.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $744M | $899M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $237M | -$34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $737M | $63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +17.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +108.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | +95.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TNL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TNL's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than H's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $16.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $20.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.89x | -313.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.78x | 52.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.36x | 22.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 2.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.76x | 101.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TNL scores 6/9 vs H's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.0% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $253M | $788M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.9B | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.56x | 1.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TNL and H each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in H five years ago would be worth $21,703 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,739 for TNL. Over the past 12 months, TNL leads with a +44.6% total return vs H's +39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNL at 25.7% vs H's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.6% | +39.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.6% | +45.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.4% | +117.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.2% | +254.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.7% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TNL and H each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNL is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than H's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. H currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs TNL's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.00 | $180.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.23 | $120.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.2% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 748K | 784K |
Analyst Outlook
TNL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TNL as "Buy" and H as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.6% upside for TNL (target: $85) vs 12.7% for H (target: $191). For income investors, TNL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.43% vs H's 0.35%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $84.89 | $190.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.23 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.4% | +2.0% |
TNL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
TNL vs H: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNL or H a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the stronger pick with 117.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL). Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TNL or H?
On forward P/E, Travel + Leisure Co.
is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TNL or H?
Over the past 5 years, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) delivered a total return of +117.
0%, compared to +17. 4% for Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: H returned +254. 3% versus TNL's +156. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TNL or H?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Hyatt Hotels Corporation's 1. 39β — meaning H is approximately 6% more volatile than TNL relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — TNL or H?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is pulling ahead at 117.
0% versus 4. 1% for Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Travel + Leisure Co. grew EPS -35. 7% year-over-year, compared to -104. 3% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, H leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TNL or H?
Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 7% net margin versus -0. 7% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TNL leads at 17. 8% versus 7. 8% for H. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TNL leads at 27. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TNL or H more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 52. 6x for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — 43. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNL: 30. 6% to $84. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — TNL or H?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 0. 4% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H).
09Is TNL or H better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 4% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNL: +156. 2%, H: +254. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TNL and H?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TNL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; H is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TNL pays a dividend while H does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.