Publishing
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TNMG vs GOOGL vs META vs IAC vs TTD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
TNMG vs GOOGL vs META vs IAC vs TTD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Publishing | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1M | $4.81T | $1.56T | $3.21B | $11.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $81M | $422.57B | $214.96B | $2.25B | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-89M | $160.21B | $70.59B | $41M | $433M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 60.4% | 81.9% | 64.6% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | -68.7% | 32.7% | 41.2% | 1.5% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.6x | 20.4x | 109.7x | 21.2x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $59.29B | $83.90B | $1.43B | $436M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $30.71B | $35.87B | $960M | $658M |
TNMG vs GOOGL vs META vs IAC vs TTD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TNL Mediagene (TNMG) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 210.2 | +110.2% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 121.9 | +21.9% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNMG vs GOOGL vs META vs IAC vs TTD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNMG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +213.8% vs TTD's -58.4%
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs TTD's 6.8%
- PEG 0.99 vs TTD's 1.61
- Lower P/E (29.6x vs 109.7x)
META is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.9%
- Beta 1.59, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.60x
- 22.2% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
IAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 29.8%, current ratio 2.75x
TTD is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 1.06 vs META's 1.59, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.6x vs 109.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs TNMG's -110.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs META's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +213.8% vs TTD's -58.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs TNMG's -95.0%, ROIC 25.1% vs -19.5% |
TNMG vs GOOGL vs META vs IAC vs TTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TNMG vs GOOGL vs META vs IAC vs TTD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
META leads in 2 of 6 categories
GOOGL leads 2 • IAC leads 1 • TNMG leads 0 • TTD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 5205.8x TNMG's $81M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TNMG's -110.0%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $81M | $422.6B | $215.0B | $2.2B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$51M | $161.3B | $109.3B | $129M | $693M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$89M | $160.2B | $70.6B | $41M | $433M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $73.3B | $48.3B | $60M | $837M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +60.4% | +81.9% | +64.6% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -68.7% | +32.7% | +41.2% | +1.5% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -110.0% | +37.9% | +32.8% | +1.8% | +14.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.0% | +17.3% | +22.4% | +2.7% | +28.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +21.8% | +33.1% | -25.9% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.8% | +81.9% | +62.4% | +64.8% | -20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IAC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.8x trailing earnings, TTD trades at a 30% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs TTD's 1.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $4.81T | $1.56T | $3.2B | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $4.84T | $1.61T | $3.7B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 36.82x | 26.26x | -32.42x | 25.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.61x | 20.36x | 109.69x | 21.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x | 1.43x | — | 1.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.22x | 15.81x | 14.30x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 11.95x | 7.78x | 1.34x | 3.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 11.72x | 7.31x | 0.70x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.72x | 33.90x | 71.54x | 14.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-2 for TNMG. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNMG's 23.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs TNMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +39.0% | +33.2% | +0.9% | +16.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -95.0% | +27.4% | +20.8% | +0.6% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.5% | +25.1% | +27.6% | -1.2% | +21.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.6% | +30.3% | +29.4% | -1.3% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 23.55x | 0.14x | 0.39x | 0.30x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | $28.6B | $48.0B | $466M | -$222M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $30.7B | $35.9B | $960M | $658M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $59.3B | $83.9B | $1.4B | $436M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.64x | 392.15x | 78.84x | 4.84x | 1591.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $540 for TNMG. Over the past 12 months, TNMG leads with a +213.8% total return vs TTD's -58.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs TNMG's -62.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.2% | +26.4% | -5.1% | +10.5% | -37.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +213.8% | +163.5% | +3.7% | +22.1% | -58.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +270.8% | +166.4% | -2.9% | -63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +239.8% | +94.8% | -67.3% | -64.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +996.1% | +421.2% | +347.8% | +680.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.2% | +54.8% | +38.6% | -1.0% | -28.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOOGL and TTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than META's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs TNMG's 19.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.26x | 1.59x | 1.10x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.68 | $400.10 | $796.25 | $45.78 | $91.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.13 | $147.84 | $520.26 | $29.56 | $19.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.6% | +99.5% | +77.5% | +94.2% | +25.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 83.4 | 42.8 | 48.1 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 28.3M | 15.6M | 1.1M | 20.4M |
Analyst Outlook
META leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TNMG as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", META as "Buy", IAC as "Buy", TTD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.0% upside for TTD (target: $37) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, META offers the higher dividend yield at 0.34% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $406.28 | $821.80 | $49.17 | $37.12 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 82 | 60 | 33 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | $2.07 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +1.7% | +9.8% | +12.3% |
META leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). GOOGL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
TNMG vs GOOGL vs META vs IAC vs TTD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNMG or GOOGL or META or IAC or TTD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TNL Mediagene (TNMG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TNMG or GOOGL or META or IAC or TTD?
On trailing P/E, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. 's 1. 61x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TNMG or GOOGL or META or IAC or TTD?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -94. 6% for TNL Mediagene (TNMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus TNMG's -94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TNMG or GOOGL or META or IAC or TTD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning META is approximately 50% more volatile than TTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 24% for TNL Mediagene — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TNMG or GOOGL or META or IAC or TTD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Meta Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TNMG leads at 31. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TNMG or GOOGL or META or IAC or TTD?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -99. 0% for TNL Mediagene — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus -22. 1% for TNMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TNMG or GOOGL or META or IAC or TTD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. 's 1. 61x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 89. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTD: 58. 0% to $37. 12.
08Which pays a better dividend — TNMG or GOOGL or META or IAC or TTD?
In this comparison, META (0.
3% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TNMG, IAC, TTD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TNMG or GOOGL or META or IAC or TTD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, TNMG: -94. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TNMG and GOOGL and META and IAC and TTD?
These companies operate in different sectors (TNMG (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and META (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology) and TTD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TNMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.