Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TOP vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs LSPD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Application
TOP vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs LSPD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $29M | $51.52B | $242M | $628M | $1.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $13.59B | $736M | $392M | $1.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $7.91B | $-294M | $118M | $-693M |
| Gross Margin | 7.4% | 82.0% | 2.2% | 65.0% | 39.6% |
| Operating Margin | -167.2% | 48.7% | -34.3% | 35.6% | -58.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.5x | — | 6.8x | 20.0x |
| Total Debt | $271K | $8.55B | $157M | $180M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $11.69B | $134M | $394M | $558M |
TOP vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs LSPD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOP Financial Group… (TOP) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| Futu Holdings Limit… (FUTU) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| Wheels Up Experienc… (UP) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 136.5 | +36.5% |
| Lightspeed Commerce… (LSPD) | 100 | 43.8 | -56.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOP vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs LSPD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.01
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 3.44x
- Beta 1.01, current ratio 3.44x
- Beta 1.01 vs UP's 2.50
FUTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs TIGR's -39.9%
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 20.0x)
- 40.1% margin vs TOP's -179.3%
- +45.1% vs UP's -71.4%
UP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TIGR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 71.4%
- 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs TOP's -58.6%
Among these 5 stocks, LSPD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs TOP's -58.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 20.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.1% margin vs TOP's -179.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs UP's 2.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs UP's -71.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 14.8% vs -36.8% |
TOP vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs LSPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TOP vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs LSPD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUTU leads in 3 of 6 categories
TOP leads 0 • UP leads 0 • TIGR leads 0 • LSPD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.6B annually — 4082.0x TOP's $3M. FUTU is the more profitable business, keeping 40.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOP's -179.3%. On growth, LSPD holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $13.6B | $736M | $392M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $10.0B | -$191M | $225M | -$562M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $7.9B | -$294M | $118M | -$693M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $0 | -$270M | $673M | $31M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +82.0% | +2.2% | +65.0% | +39.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -167.2% | +48.7% | -34.3% | +35.6% | -58.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -179.3% | +40.1% | -39.9% | +15.5% | -58.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +2.3% | -36.7% | +2.1% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -10.2% | — | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.2% | +112.0% | +69.2% | +12.4% | -41.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TOP and TIGR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.9x trailing earnings, TIGR trades at a 39% valuation discount to FUTU's 29.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TIGR's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FUTU's 58.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $51.5B | $242M | $628M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $51.1B | $265M | $414M | $801M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.84x | 29.18x | -0.80x | 17.86x | -2.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.53x | — | 6.79x | 20.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.30x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 58.89x | — | 2.80x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.62x | 29.69x | 0.33x | 1.60x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 5.67x | — | 1.64x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.09x | — | 0.76x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU delivers a 26.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-46 for LSPD. TOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUTU's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs TOP's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.4% | +26.4% | — | +17.6% | -46.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +4.6% | -29.1% | +1.6% | -41.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.0% | +14.8% | — | +13.8% | -36.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.6% | +25.1% | -167.1% | +18.7% | -33.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.31x | — | 0.27x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$3.1B | $23M | -$214M | -$541M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $11.7B | $134M | $394M | $558M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $270,866 | $8.6B | $157M | $180M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -2.21x | 3.26x | -510.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUTU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUTU five years ago would be worth $11,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for UP. Over the past 12 months, FUTU leads with a +45.1% total return vs UP's -71.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUTU at 53.6% vs UP's -59.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.3% | -17.4% | -49.2% | -38.4% | -16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.0% | +45.1% | -71.4% | -29.9% | +0.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | +262.2% | -93.2% | +121.7% | -33.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | +15.0% | -99.7% | -62.3% | -84.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | +875.5% | -99.7% | -39.9% | -70.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.0% | +53.6% | -59.3% | +30.4% | -12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TOP and FUTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TOP is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UP's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUTU currently trades 71.5% from its 52-week high vs UP's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 2.04x | 2.50x | 2.02x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.33 | $202.53 | $70.00 | $13.55 | $14.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $99.20 | $0.75 | $5.95 | $8.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.3% | +71.5% | +9.6% | +47.5% | +68.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 65.0 | 38.9 | 52.1 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 822K | 1.4M | 131K | 2.3M | 831K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUTU as "Buy", UP as "Hold", TIGR as "Sell", LSPD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7373.8% upside for UP (target: $500) vs -26.4% for TIGR (target: $5).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $224.80 | $500.00 | $4.73 | $12.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 9 | 4 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +9.9% |
FUTU leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
TOP vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs LSPD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOP or FUTU or UP or TIGR or LSPD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 6% for TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOP or FUTU or UP or TIGR or LSPD?
On trailing P/E, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the cheapest at 17. 9x versus Futu Holdings Limited at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Futu Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOP or FUTU or UP or TIGR or LSPD?
Over the past 5 years, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) delivered a total return of +15.
0%, compared to -99. 7% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +875. 5% versus UP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOP or FUTU or UP or TIGR or LSPD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
01β versus Wheels Up Experience Inc. 's 2. 50β — meaning UP is approximately 147% more volatile than TOP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 31% for Futu Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOP or FUTU or UP or TIGR or LSPD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -58. 6% for TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -590. 8% for TOP Financial Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, LSPD leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOP or FUTU or UP or TIGR or LSPD?
Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more profitable company, earning 40.
1% net margin versus -179. 3% for TOP Financial Group Limited — meaning it keeps 40. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus -167. 2% for TOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUTU leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TOP or FUTU or UP or TIGR or LSPD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) trades at 1.
5x forward P/E versus 20. 0x for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UP: 7373. 8% to $500. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TOP or FUTU or UP or TIGR or LSPD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TOP or FUTU or UP or TIGR or LSPD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
01)). Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TOP: -95. 4%, UP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TOP and FUTU and UP and TIGR and LSPD?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOP (Financial Services) and FUTU (Financial Services) and UP (Industrials) and TIGR (Financial Services) and LSPD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock; LSPD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.