Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TOPS vs PSHG vs INSW vs SBLK vs TNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Oil & Gas Midstream
Marine Shipping
Oil & Gas Midstream
TOPS vs PSHG vs INSW vs SBLK vs TNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $10M | $71M | $4.46B | $3.09B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $123M | $80M | $676M | $1.04B | $952M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $52M | $546M | $84M | $351M |
| Gross Margin | 59.5% | 55.4% | 40.6% | 33.0% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | 36.5% | 63.7% | 44.4% | 13.6% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 1.7x | 8.5x | 8.0x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $251M | $48M | $576M | $1.07B | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $70M | $117M | $500M | $831M |
TOPS vs PSHG vs INSW vs SBLK vs TNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Performance Shippin… (PSHG) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 526.7 | +426.7% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 467.6 | +367.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOPS vs PSHG vs INSW vs SBLK vs TNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
- 3.8% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
PSHG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (1.7x vs 6.0x)
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.43, yield 3.2%
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
- 80.8% margin vs TOPS's 1.2%
- 3.2% yield, vs PSHG's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.16 vs TNK's 0.19
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
- Beta 0.35, yield 2.4%, current ratio 7.98x
- Beta 0.35 vs SBLK's 0.73, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.7x vs 6.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs TOPS's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs SBLK's 0.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs PSHG's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.2% vs TOPS's -61.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs TOPS's 0.3%, ROIC 9.4% vs 5.3% |
TOPS vs PSHG vs INSW vs SBLK vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TOPS vs PSHG vs INSW vs SBLK vs TNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INSW leads in 3 of 6 categories
TOPS leads 1 • PSHG leads 0 • SBLK leads 0 • TNK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 13.1x PSHG's $80M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOPS's 1.2%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $123M | $80M | $676M | $1.0B | $952M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $66M | $64M | $465M | $311M | $348M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $52M | $546M | $84M | $351M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$63M | -$35M | $193M | $209M | $113M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.5% | +55.4% | +40.6% | +33.0% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +63.7% | +44.4% | +13.6% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +65.4% | +80.8% | +8.1% | +36.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -50.9% | -44.4% | +28.5% | +20.0% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -19.0% | -91.3% | -2.7% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -70.5% | +4.8% | +58.3% | +46.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, PSHG trades at a 95% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.26x vs SBLK's 0.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $71M | $4.5B | $3.1B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $254M | $48M | $4.9B | $3.7B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.02x | 1.69x | 14.48x | 36.73x | 8.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.52x | 8.00x | 6.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.75x | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.97x | 0.86x | 10.48x | 11.87x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 0.81x | 5.29x | 2.97x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.07x | 0.26x | 2.21x | 1.26x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.59x | 5.69x | 117.08x | 14.73x | 25.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PSHG and INSW and TNK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $1 for TOPS. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +16.5% | +27.1% | +3.4% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +9.4% | +20.1% | +2.2% | +15.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +13.3% | +9.4% | +3.2% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +14.0% | +12.1% | +4.0% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.74x | 0.17x | 0.29x | 0.44x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $244M | -$23M | $459M | $572M | -$776M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $70M | $117M | $500M | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $251M | $48M | $576M | $1.1B | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.91x | 19.08x | 0.90x | 2.08x | 109.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.6% | -17.4% | +96.5% | +40.3% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.1% | +14.6% | +160.2% | +83.1% | +80.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.2% | +141.3% | +179.7% | +60.6% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -97.3% | +438.1% | +79.1% | +513.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.8% | +1014.5% | +977.3% | +187.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.2% | +34.1% | +40.9% | +17.1% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SBLK and TNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBLK's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.68x | 0.43x | 0.73x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.47 | $2.58 | $91.58 | $27.20 | $83.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.11 | $1.40 | $35.60 | $14.79 | $41.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.2% | +70.2% | +98.5% | +98.6% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.7 | 49.3 | 67.3 | 72.8 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 210K | 139K | 597K | 1.4M | 542K |
Analyst Outlook
INSW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSW as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, INSW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $83.33 | $29.00 | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 13 | 24 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +3.2% | +1.1% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.05 | $2.92 | $0.30 | $1.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% |
INSW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TOPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TOPS vs PSHG vs INSW vs SBLK vs TNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOPS or PSHG or INSW or SBLK or TNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the stronger pick with 3. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOPS or PSHG or INSW or SBLK or TNK?
On trailing P/E, Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Star Bulk Carriers Corp. wins at 0. 16x versus Teekay Tankers Ltd. 's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOPS or PSHG or INSW or SBLK or TNK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOPS or PSHG or INSW or SBLK or TNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 's 0. 73β — meaning SBLK is approximately 109% more volatile than TNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOPS or PSHG or INSW or SBLK or TNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is pulling ahead at 3. 8% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSHG leads at 33. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOPS or PSHG or INSW or SBLK or TNK?
Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 0% net margin versus 5. 8% for Top Ships Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSHG leads at 47. 8% versus 13. 5% for SBLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSHG leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TOPS or PSHG or INSW or SBLK or TNK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus Teekay Tankers Ltd. 's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 5x for International Seaways, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TOPS or PSHG or INSW or SBLK or TNK?
In this comparison, INSW (3.
2% yield), PSHG (2. 6% yield), TNK (2. 4% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TOPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TOPS or PSHG or INSW or SBLK or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, TOPS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TOPS and PSHG and INSW and SBLK and TNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOPS (Industrials) and PSHG (Industrials) and INSW (Energy) and SBLK (Industrials) and TNK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; PSHG is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock. PSHG, INSW, SBLK, TNK pay a dividend while TOPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.