Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $104M | $45M | $3.09B | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $44M | $1.04B | $123M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-2M | $84M | $1M |
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 26.5% | 33.0% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | -26.5% | 5.4% | 13.6% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | — | 8.0x | 2.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $109M | $1.07B | $251M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $27M | $500M | $8M |
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toro Corp. (TORO) | 100 | 202.6 | +102.6% |
| Globus Maritime Lim… (GLBS) | 100 | 196.4 | +96.4% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TORO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 1.5%
- Beta 1.83, yield 1.5%, current ratio 11.77x
- 26.0% margin vs GLBS's -4.0%
- 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
GLBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 62.1%, current ratio 2.74x
- 26.8% revenue growth vs TORO's -71.5%
- Beta 0.50 vs TORO's 1.83
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs TORO's 110.4%
- 2.2% ROA vs GLBS's -0.6%, ROIC 3.2% vs 0.7%
TOPS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 8.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.8% revenue growth vs TORO's -71.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 8.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.0% margin vs GLBS's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs TORO's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +328.6% vs TOPS's -61.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs GLBS's -0.6%, ROIC 3.2% vs 0.7% |
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TOPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
TORO leads 2 • SBLK leads 1 • GLBS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 49.4x TORO's $21M. TORO is the more profitable business, keeping 26.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLBS's -4.0%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $44M | $1.0B | $123M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$540,732 | $16M | $311M | $66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$2M | $84M | $1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$92M | $2M | $209M | -$63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +26.5% | +33.0% | +59.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.5% | +5.4% | +13.6% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | -4.0% | +8.1% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +5.2% | +20.0% | -50.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +54.8% | -2.7% | +100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +141.9% | +58.3% | -3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TOPS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, TOPS trades at a 95% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TOPS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $104M | $45M | $3.1B | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $67M | $128M | $3.7B | $254M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.00x | -26.04x | 36.73x | 2.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.00x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.75x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.55x | 11.87x | 4.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 1.02x | 2.97x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 0.26x | 1.26x | 0.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.20x | — | 14.73x | 0.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SBLK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SBLK delivers a 3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-1 for GLBS. SBLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLBS scores 6/9 vs TORO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | -1.0% | +3.4% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -0.6% | +2.2% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +0.7% | +3.2% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.8% | +0.9% | +4.0% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.62x | 0.44x | 1.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$37M | $83M | $572M | $244M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $27M | $500M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $109M | $1.1B | $251M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.11x | 0.76x | 2.08x | 1.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TORO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TORO five years ago would be worth $21,039 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, TORO leads with a +328.6% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TORO at 32.4% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.6% | +32.5% | +40.3% | -53.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +328.6% | +101.8% | +83.1% | -61.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.1% | +126.8% | +60.6% | -75.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.4% | -50.5% | +79.1% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.4% | -99.9% | +977.3% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.4% | +31.4% | +17.1% | -37.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLBS and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TORO's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 0.50x | 0.73x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.50 | $2.44 | $27.20 | $11.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.77 | $0.99 | $14.79 | $2.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +90.2% | +98.6% | +19.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 53.2 | 72.8 | 24.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 566K | 87K | 1.4M | 210K |
Analyst Outlook
TORO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, TORO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.48% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $29.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 24 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | — | $0.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +100.0% |
TOPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TORO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the stronger pick with 26.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -71. 5% for Toro Corp. (TORO). Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS?
On trailing P/E, Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS?
Over the past 5 years, Toro Corp.
(TORO) delivered a total return of +110. 4%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Toro Corp. 's 1. 83β — meaning TORO is approximately 262% more volatile than GLBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is pulling ahead at 26.
8% versus -71. 5% for Toro Corp. (TORO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -504. 3% for Globus Maritime Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOPS leads at 15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS?
Toro Corp.
(TORO) is the more profitable company, earning 112. 6% net margin versus -4. 0% for Globus Maritime Limited — meaning it keeps 112. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOPS leads at 32. 4% versus -24. 8% for TORO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TOPS leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS?
In this comparison, TORO (1.
5% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. GLBS, TOPS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Toro Corp. (TORO) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, TORO: +110. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TORO and GLBS and SBLK and TOPS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TORO is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLBS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock. TORO, SBLK pay a dividend while GLBS, TOPS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.