Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TPST vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
TPST vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $55M | $1.64B | $5.53B | $114.85B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $66M | $0.00 | $48.48B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $-423M | $-464M | $7.28B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | — | 82.1% | — | 68.7% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -7.2% | — | 25.7% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 8.9x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $62M | $98K | $47.14B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $89M | $714M | $10.21B | $214M |
TPST vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tempest Therapeutic… (TPST) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Agios Pharmaceutica… (AGIO) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 112.8 | +12.8% |
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 94.0 | -6.0% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TPST vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TPST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AGIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 48.0%, EPS growth -161.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 56.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 11.46x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 11.46x
- 48.0% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- +96.1% vs TPST's -69.3%
BMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 4.4%
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 16.0x)
- 15.0% margin vs AGIO's -6.4%
- Beta 0.50 vs TPST's 1.70
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.0% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs AGIO's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs TPST's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +96.1% vs TPST's -69.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs TPST's -210.5%, ROIC 16.9% vs -5.1% |
TPST vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TPST vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BMY leads in 4 of 6 categories
IMVT leads 1 • TPST leads 0 • AGIO leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $48.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. BMY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGIO's -6.4%. On growth, AGIO holds the edge at +137.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $66M | $0 | $48.5B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | -$470M | -$487M | $15.7B | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | -$423M | -$464M | $7.3B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | -$385M | -$423M | $11.9B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +82.1% | — | +68.7% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -7.2% | — | +25.7% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -6.4% | — | +15.0% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -5.8% | — | +24.6% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +137.7% | — | +2.6% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.7% | -9.0% | +19.7% | +9.2% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BMY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BMY's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRL's 13.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55M | $1.6B | $5.5B | $114.8B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40M | $1.6B | $4.8B | $151.8B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.31x | -3.87x | -9.97x | 16.30x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 8.91x | 16.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 9.17x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 30.30x | — | 2.38x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.87x | 1.34x | 5.83x | 6.20x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 8.94x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TPST. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.7% | -34.1% | -47.1% | +39.0% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | -31.7% | -44.1% | +7.9% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | -26.3% | — | +16.9% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -121.0% | -33.8% | -66.1% | +18.7% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 0.05x | 0.00x | 2.55x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$27M | -$714M | $36.9B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $89M | $714M | $10.2B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $62M | $98,000 | $47.1B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -78.41x | — | — | 10.33x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,205 for TPST. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +96.1% total return vs TPST's -69.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 12.1% vs TPST's -58.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.2% | +1.3% | +5.1% | +7.6% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.3% | -2.4% | +96.1% | +23.4% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.6% | +8.3% | +40.9% | -7.1% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.0% | -50.7% | +62.4% | +5.2% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -42.2% | +173.6% | +6.7% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.0% | +2.7% | +12.1% | -2.4% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and BMY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMY is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPST's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs TPST's 16.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 1.10x | 1.36x | 0.45x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.23 | $46.00 | $30.09 | $62.89 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.50 | $22.24 | $13.36 | $42.52 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.1% | +59.8% | +90.5% | +89.4% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 41.9 | 60.2 | 41.4 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 1.0M | 1.4M | 10.3M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
BMY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGIO as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", BMY as "Hold", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 10.2% for BMY (target: $62). BMY is the only dividend payer here at 4.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $37.75 | $45.50 | $62.00 | $206.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 23 | 41 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.47 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% |
BMY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
TPST vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TPST or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is the stronger pick with 48. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AGIO) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TPST or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 8.
9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TPST or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -88. 0% for Tempest Therapeutics, Inc. (TPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +190. 9% versus TPST's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TPST or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
45β versus Tempest Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning TPST is approximately 254% more volatile than BMY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TPST or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is pulling ahead at 48. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGIO leads at 56. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TPST or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus -764. 0% for Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMY leads at 26. 3% versus -873. 9% for AGIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGIO leads at 78. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TPST or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 8.
9x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 67. 2% to $45. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TPST or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
In this comparison, BMY (4.
4% yield) pays a dividend. TPST, AGIO, IMVT, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TPST or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
45), 4. 4% yield). Tempest Therapeutics, Inc. (TPST) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMY: +6. 6%, TPST: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TPST and AGIO and IMVT and BMY and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TPST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BMY pays a dividend while TPST, AGIO, IMVT, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.