Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRC vs TTGT vs ZETA vs ALCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
Agricultural Farm Products
TRC vs TTGT vs ZETA vs ALCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $553M | $468M | $3.81B | $316M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $261M | $1.44B | $29M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73K | $-556M | $-23M | $-142M |
| Gross Margin | 12.3% | 111.7% | 63.8% | -6.0% |
| Operating Margin | -16.0% | -275.4% | -0.0% | -7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 341.3x | — | 18.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $94M | $111M | $197M | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $41M | $320M | $38M |
TRC vs TTGT vs ZETA vs ALCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tejon Ranch Co. (TRC) | 100 | 134.6 | +34.6% |
| TechTarget, Inc. (TTGT) | 100 | 8.3 | -91.7% |
| Zeta Global Holding… (ZETA) | 100 | 205.7 | +105.7% |
| Alico, Inc. (ALCO) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRC vs TTGT vs ZETA vs ALCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 0.1% margin vs ALCO's -487.4%
- 0.0% ROA vs ALCO's -72.7%, ROIC -1.1% vs -59.5%
TTGT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 70.9%, EPS growth -247.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.2%
- 70.9% revenue growth vs ALCO's -5.5%
ZETA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 94.4% 10Y total return vs ALCO's 66.6%
- Better valuation composite
ALCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 79.2%, current ratio 9.56x
- Beta 0.34, yield 0.5%, current ratio 9.56x
- Beta 0.34 vs ZETA's 2.79
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.9% revenue growth vs ALCO's -5.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs ALCO's -487.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs ZETA's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.5% vs TTGT's -18.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.0% ROA vs ALCO's -72.7%, ROIC -1.1% vs -59.5% |
TRC vs TTGT vs ZETA vs ALCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRC vs TTGT vs ZETA vs ALCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZETA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ALCO leads 1 • TRC leads 0 • TTGT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZETA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZETA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 49.4x ALCO's $29M. TRC is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALCO's -4.9%. On growth, ZETA holds the edge at +49.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $261M | $1.4B | $29M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47,000 | -$640M | $77M | -$41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73,000 | -$556M | -$23M | -$142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | -$4M | $200M | $19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +111.7% | +63.8% | -6.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.0% | -2.8% | -0.0% | -7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -2.1% | -1.6% | -4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -65.9% | -1.6% | +13.9% | +66.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.7% | -99.8% | +49.9% | -88.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.5% | +86.6% | +100.0% | +62.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TTGT and ZETA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TTGT's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZETA's 47.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $553M | $468M | $3.8B | $316M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $637M | $538M | $3.7B | $364M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7312.50x | -0.46x | -123.43x | -2.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 341.25x | — | 18.71x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.39x | 47.63x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.15x | 0.96x | 2.92x | 7.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 0.78x | 4.78x | 2.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.32x | 20.58x | 21.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZETA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRC delivers a 0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-136 for ALCO. TTGT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALCO's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRC scores 6/9 vs ALCO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | -93.2% | -3.0% | -135.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | -57.0% | -1.8% | -72.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.1% | -2.0% | +0.7% | -59.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | -2.5% | +0.5% | -68.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.19x | 0.24x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $84M | $71M | -$123M | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $41M | $320M | $38M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $111M | $197M | $86M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -95.68x | 5.22x | -57.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZETA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZETA five years ago would be worth $19,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $874 for TTGT. Over the past 12 months, ALCO leads with a +42.5% total return vs TTGT's -18.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZETA at 27.8% vs TTGT's -42.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.7% | +25.1% | -13.2% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.8% | -18.0% | +30.9% | +42.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | -80.6% | +108.9% | +82.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.2% | -91.3% | +94.4% | +45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.5% | -19.2% | +94.4% | +66.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | -42.1% | +27.8% | +22.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRC and ALCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZETA's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRC currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs TTGT's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 1.35x | 2.79x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.31 | $9.47 | $24.90 | $44.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.31 | $3.41 | $12.10 | $28.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +68.3% | +69.4% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 71.9 | 48.5 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 98K | 476K | 7.3M | 29K |
Analyst Outlook
ALCO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRC as "Buy", TTGT as "Buy", ZETA as "Buy", ALCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for TTGT (target: $15) vs 9.0% for ALCO (target: $45). ALCO is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $26.33 | $45.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 16 | 15 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% |
ZETA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALCO leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
TRC vs TTGT vs ZETA vs ALCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRC or TTGT or ZETA or ALCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TechTarget, Inc.
(TTGT) is the stronger pick with 70. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Alico, Inc. (ALCO). Tejon Ranch Co. (TRC) offers the better valuation at 7312. 5x trailing P/E (341. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tejon Ranch Co. (TRC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRC or TTGT or ZETA or ALCO?
On forward P/E, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
is actually cheaper at 18. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRC or TTGT or ZETA or ALCO?
Over the past 5 years, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -91. 3% for TechTarget, Inc. (TTGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZETA returned +94. 4% versus TTGT's -19. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRC or TTGT or ZETA or ALCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alico, Inc.
(ALCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Zeta Global Holdings Corp. 's 2. 79β — meaning ZETA is approximately 723% more volatile than ALCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TechTarget, Inc. (TTGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 79% for Alico, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRC or TTGT or ZETA or ALCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TechTarget, Inc.
(TTGT) is pulling ahead at 70. 9% versus -5. 5% for Alico, Inc. (ALCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zeta Global Holdings Corp. grew EPS 63. 2% year-over-year, compared to -22. 2% for Alico, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTGT leads at 35. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRC or TTGT or ZETA or ALCO?
Tejon Ranch Co.
(TRC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 2% net margin versus -334. 3% for Alico, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZETA leads at 0. 4% versus -450. 5% for ALCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZETA leads at 60. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRC or TTGT or ZETA or ALCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) trades at 18. 7x forward P/E versus 341. 3x for Tejon Ranch Co. — 322. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTGT: 131. 8% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRC or TTGT or ZETA or ALCO?
In this comparison, ALCO (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TRC, TTGT, ZETA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRC or TTGT or ZETA or ALCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alico, Inc.
(ALCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34)). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALCO: +66. 6%, ZETA: +94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRC and TTGT and ZETA and ALCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRC (Industrials) and TTGT (Communication Services) and ZETA (Technology) and ALCO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRC is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTGT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ZETA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.