TRS
TriMas Corporation
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$1.57B
5Y Perf.+75.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TRS vs ATR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$7.89B
5Y Perf.+10.1%
TRS vs ATR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TRS | ATR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $1.57B | $7.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $868M | $3.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $909M | $387M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 13.0% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $505M | $1.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $402M |
TRS vs ATR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TRS
ATR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TriMas Corporation (TRS) | 100 | 175.9 | +75.9% |
| AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) | 100 | 110.1 | +10.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRS vs ATR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ATR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. TriMas Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TRS
TriMas Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
TRS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 148.1% 10Y total return vs ATR's 80.7%
- 104.7% margin vs ATR's 10.0%
- +69.8% vs ATR's -17.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.
The Income Pick
ATR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 56.4%, current ratio 1.62x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ATR | 5.4% revenue growth vs TRS's -30.2% |
| Value | ATR | Lower P/E (22.0x vs 26.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | TRS | 104.7% margin vs ATR's 10.0% |
| Stability / Safety | ATR | Beta 0.66 vs TRS's 1.04, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ATR | 1.5% yield, 33-year raise streak, vs TRS's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TRS | +69.8% vs ATR's -17.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TRS | 54.6% ROA vs ATR's 7.6%, ROIC 0.9% vs 10.7% |
TRS vs ATR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TRS vs ATR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTRSLAGGINGATR
ATRAptarGroup, Inc.
1leads
TRSTriMas Corporation
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ATRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TRS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
ATR2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRS and ATR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 4.5x TRS's $868M. TRS is the more profitable business, keeping 104.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATR's 10.0%. On growth, ATR holds the edge at +10.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | ATRAptarGroup, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $868M | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $801M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $909M | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $325M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +21.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +13.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +104.7% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.4% | +10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.3% | -4.3% |
Evenly matched — TRS and ATR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TRS and ATR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, TRS trades at a 32% valuation discount to ATR's 20.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ATR's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRS's 28.7x.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | ATRAptarGroup, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $7.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.11x | 20.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.48x | 22.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.73x | 11.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 2.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.41x | 3.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.67x | 26.35x |
Evenly matched — TRS and ATR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TRS and ATR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRS delivers a 101.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $19 for ATR. ATR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRS's 0.72x.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | ATRAptarGroup, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +101.1% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +54.6% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $475M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $402M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $505M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.87x | 16.19x |
Evenly matched — TRS and ATR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRS five years ago would be worth $12,655 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,370 for ATR. Over the past 12 months, TRS leads with a +69.8% total return vs ATR's -17.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRS at 18.2% vs ATR's 1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | ATRAptarGroup, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.8% | +0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.8% | -17.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.0% | +5.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | -16.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.1% | +80.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +1.7% |
TRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRS and ATR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATR is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRS's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRS currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs ATR's 74.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | ATRAptarGroup, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.48 | $164.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.65 | $103.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +74.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 479K | 466K |
Evenly matched — TRS and ATR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
ATR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRS as "Buy" and ATR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.4% upside for ATR (target: $170) vs -8.7% for TRS (target: $38). For income investors, ATR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.48% vs TRS's 0.39%.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | ATRAptarGroup, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $169.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 33 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $1.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +4.6% |
ATR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TRS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). ATR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.
Best OverallTriMas Corporation (TRS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TRS vs ATR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRS or ATR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AptarGroup, Inc.
(ATR) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 2% for TriMas Corporation (TRS). TriMas Corporation (TRS) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriMas Corporation (TRS) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRS or ATR?
On trailing P/E, TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the cheapest at 14.
1x versus AptarGroup, Inc. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, AptarGroup, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRS or ATR?
Over the past 5 years, TriMas Corporation (TRS) delivered a total return of +26.
5%, compared to -16. 3% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRS returned +148. 1% versus ATR's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRS or ATR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AptarGroup, Inc.
(ATR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus TriMas Corporation's 1. 04β — meaning TRS is approximately 57% more volatile than ATR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 72% for TriMas Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRS or ATR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AptarGroup, Inc.
(ATR) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -30. 2% for TriMas Corporation (TRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriMas Corporation grew EPS 400. 0% year-over-year, compared to 6. 3% for AptarGroup, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATR leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRS or ATR?
TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus 10. 4% for AptarGroup, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATR leads at 13. 6% versus 2. 2% for TRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATR leads at 29. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRS or ATR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AptarGroup, Inc.
(ATR) trades at 22. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for TriMas Corporation — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATR: 38. 4% to $169. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRS or ATR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 4% for TriMas Corporation (TRS).
09Is TRS or ATR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AptarGroup, Inc.
(ATR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATR: +80. 7%, TRS: +148. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRS and ATR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRS (Consumer Cyclical) and ATR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRS is a small-cap deep-value stock; ATR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ATR pays a dividend while TRS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TRS: -30.4% · ATR: 10.8%)Net Margin>
%
(TRS: 104.7% · ATR: 10.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TRS: 14.1x · ATR: 20.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.