Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRVG vs BKNG vs EXPE vs MMYT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
TRVG vs BKNG vs EXPE vs MMYT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $253M | $132.72B | $29.58B | $4.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $548M | $27.69B | $15.17B | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $6.15B | $1.56B | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 96.8% | 100.0% | 88.8% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.3% | 34.3% | 14.7% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 20.3x | 16.3x | 13.0x | 73.2x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $19.29B | $6.67B | $237M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $131M | $17.20B | $6.98B | $509M |
TRVG vs BKNG vs EXPE vs MMYT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 100 | 34.1 | -65.9% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 261.2 | +161.2% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) | 100 | 318.1 | +218.1% |
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 326.1 | +226.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRVG vs BKNG vs EXPE vs MMYT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRVG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 17.0%, current ratio 2.22x
- Beta 0.67 vs EXPE's 1.47, lower leverage
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.9%
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs MMYT's 190.1%
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.33x
- 22.2% margin vs TRVG's 2.0%
EXPE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 73.2x)
- +52.8% vs MMYT's -54.9%
MMYT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth -54.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.7%
- 25.0% revenue growth vs EXPE's 7.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs EXPE's 7.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 73.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs TRVG's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs EXPE's 1.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EXPE's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs MMYT's -54.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs MMYT's 3.1% |
TRVG vs BKNG vs EXPE vs MMYT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRVG vs BKNG vs EXPE vs MMYT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
EXPE leads 2 • TRVG leads 0 • MMYT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 50.5x TRVG's $548M. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRVG's 2.0%. On growth, TRVG holds the edge at +25.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $548M | $27.7B | $15.2B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $10.2B | $3.1B | $175M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $6.2B | $1.6B | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $9.0B | $4.9B | $224M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.8% | +100.0% | +88.8% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +34.3% | +14.7% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +22.2% | +10.3% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +32.6% | +32.1% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.4% | +16.2% | +14.7% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +191.7% | +2.4% | +96.8% | -68.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TRVG and EXPE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.3x trailing earnings, TRVG trades at a 67% valuation discount to MMYT's 60.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EXPE's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MMYT's 28.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $253M | $132.7B | $29.6B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $141M | $134.8B | $29.3B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.31x | 25.87x | 25.77x | 60.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.32x | 13.02x | 73.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.16x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.22x | 13.41x | 10.22x | 28.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 4.93x | 2.01x | 4.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | — | 13.10x | 4.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 66.76x | 14.61x | 9.51x | 26.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPE delivers a 68.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $6 for TRVG. TRVG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXPE's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKNG scores 6/9 vs TRVG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | — | +68.7% | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +21.1% | +6.0% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | — | +40.2% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +75.4% | +23.9% | +9.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | — | 2.62x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | $2.1B | -$307M | -$272M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $131M | $17.2B | $7.0B | $509M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $19.3B | $6.7B | $237M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 183.34x | 7.21x | 16.35x | 1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXPE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $19,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,372 for TRVG. Over the past 12 months, EXPE leads with a +52.8% total return vs MMYT's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXPE at 40.2% vs TRVG's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.4% | -19.4% | -10.5% | -38.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.3% | -16.8% | +52.8% | -54.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.5% | +65.4% | +175.6% | +97.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.3% | +87.6% | +46.9% | +97.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | +250.7% | +130.6% | +190.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +18.3% | +40.2% | +25.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRVG and EXPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXPE's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXPE currently trades 83.2% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.74x | 1.47x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.30 | $5129.83 | $303.80 | $113.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.60 | $150.62 | $148.55 | $32.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.5% | +3.3% | +83.2% | +44.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.6 | 42.4 | 50.2 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 45K | 8.7M | 1.9M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BKNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BKNG as "Buy", EXPE as "Hold", MMYT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs 7.7% for EXPE (target: $272). For income investors, BKNG offers the higher dividend yield at 0.89% vs EXPE's 0.60%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $231.72 | $272.35 | $91.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 71 | 75 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.53 | $1.52 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +4.9% | +6.5% | +0.5% |
BKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). EXPE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
TRVG vs BKNG vs EXPE vs MMYT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRVG or BKNG or EXPE or MMYT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). trivago N. V. (TRVG) offers the better valuation at 20. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRVG or BKNG or EXPE or MMYT?
On trailing P/E, trivago N.
V. (TRVG) is the cheapest at 20. 3x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Expedia Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRVG or BKNG or EXPE or MMYT?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.
0%, compared to -66. 3% for trivago N. V. (TRVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +250. 7% versus TRVG's -89. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRVG or BKNG or EXPE or MMYT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), trivago N.
V. (TRVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Expedia Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning EXPE is approximately 121% more volatile than TRVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, trivago N. V. (TRVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRVG or BKNG or EXPE or MMYT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.
0% versus 7. 6% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: trivago N. V. grew EPS 144. 1% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for MakeMyTrip Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRVG or BKNG or EXPE or MMYT?
Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus 2. 0% for trivago N. V. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus 0. 3% for TRVG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRVG or BKNG or EXPE or MMYT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Expedia Group, Inc.
(EXPE) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 73. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 60. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRVG or BKNG or EXPE or MMYT?
In this comparison, BKNG (0.
9% yield), EXPE (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. TRVG, MMYT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRVG or BKNG or EXPE or MMYT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 9% yield, +250. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +250. 7%, MMYT: +190. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRVG and BKNG and EXPE and MMYT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRVG (Communication Services) and BKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and EXPE (Consumer Cyclical) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock. BKNG, EXPE pay a dividend while TRVG, MMYT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 12%
- Gross Margin > 58%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.