TSCO vs WINA vs TGT vs FIVE

For growth investors, Five Below, Inc.

(FIVE) is the stronger pick with 22. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the cheapest at 15.

4x versus Five Below, Inc. at 34. 2x. On forward P/E, Tractor Supply Company is actually cheaper at 14. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Five Below, Inc. wins at 1. 44x versus Winmark Corporation's 3. 91x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Winmark Corporation (WINA) delivered a total return of +111.

6%, compared to -31. 6% for Target Corporation (TGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVE returned +448. 6% versus TSCO's +96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

57β versus Five Below, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning FIVE is approximately 254% more volatile than TSCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Target Corporation (TGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 2% for Tractor Supply Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Five Below, Inc.

(FIVE) is pulling ahead at 22. 9% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five Below, Inc. grew EPS 40. 4% year-over-year, compared to -8. 2% for Target Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Winmark Corporation (WINA) is the more profitable company, earning 48.

4% net margin versus 3. 5% for Target Corporation — meaning it keeps 48. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WINA leads at 63. 4% versus 4. 9% for TGT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WINA leads at 96. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 44x versus Winmark Corporation's 3. 91x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for Five Below, Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TSCO: 77. 3% to $56. 27.

In this comparison, WINA (3.

6% yield), TGT (3. 6% yield), TSCO (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FIVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

57), 2. 9% yield). Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSCO: +96. 3%, FIVE: +448. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TSCO (Consumer Cyclical) and WINA (Consumer Cyclical) and TGT (Consumer Defensive) and FIVE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TSCO is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WINA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIVE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TSCO, WINA, TGT pay a dividend while FIVE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.