Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TSSI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs ADTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
Communication Equipment
TSSI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs ADTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $457M | $519M | $817M | $1.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $202M | $136M | $949M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-9M | $-170M | $-30M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 37.2% | 32.4% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 1.4% | -7.9% | -0.5% |
| Forward P/E | 47.3x | 72.1x | — | 29.7x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $9M | $2.93B | $245M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $21M | $205M | $96M |
TSSI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs ADTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSS, Inc. (TSSI) | 100 | 1721.7 | +1621.7% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
| Cogent Communicatio… (CCOI) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| ADTRAN Holdings, In… (ADTN) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSSI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs ADTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TSSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.9%, EPS growth 154.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.2%
- 98.0% 10Y total return vs CLFD's 106.7%
- 65.9% revenue growth vs CCOI's -5.8%
- 7.1% margin vs CCOI's -17.9%
CLFD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
CCOI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.67, yield 19.2%
- Beta 1.67, yield 19.2%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 1.67 vs TSSI's 3.50
- 19.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
ADTN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.9% revenue growth vs CCOI's -5.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs CCOI's -17.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.67 vs TSSI's 3.50 | |
| Dividends | 19.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.9% vs CCOI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs CCOI's -5.4%, ROIC 32.3% vs -3.1% |
TSSI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs ADTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TSSI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs ADTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADTN leads in 2 of 6 categories
TSSI leads 2 • CLFD leads 0 • CCOI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADTN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADTN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 8.2x CLFD's $136M. TSSI is the more profitable business, keeping 7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCOI's -17.9%. On growth, ADTN holds the edge at +15.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $202M | $136M | $949M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $6M | $174M | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$9M | -$170M | -$30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $15M | -$208M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +37.2% | +32.4% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +1.4% | -7.9% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -6.3% | -17.9% | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +10.8% | -21.9% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.1% | -27.1% | -3.2% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | -142.5% | +23.9% | +92.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ADTN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ADTN's 17.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 61.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $457M | $519M | $817M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $413M | $506M | $3.5B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.97x | -64.64x | -4.29x | -25.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 47.28x | 72.10x | — | 29.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.15x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.23x | 61.46x | 21.30x | 17.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 3.46x | 0.84x | 1.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.11x | 2.05x | — | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 215.64x | 21.01x | — | 11.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSSI delivers a 25.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CCOI. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TSSI's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSSI scores 7/9 vs CCOI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.3% | -3.4% | -2.3% | -5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.0% | -3.0% | -5.4% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +32.3% | +0.6% | -3.1% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +0.8% | -3.6% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.03x | — | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44M | -$13M | $2.7B | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $21M | $205M | $96M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $9M | $2.9B | $245M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.06x | 85.32x | -0.52x | 0.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSSI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSSI five years ago would be worth $273,198 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,236 for CCOI. Over the past 12 months, TSSI leads with a +127.9% total return vs CCOI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSSI at 2.8% vs CCOI's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +106.0% | +27.1% | -20.8% | +67.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +127.9% | +20.2% | -65.4% | +83.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5362.1% | +3.9% | -60.0% | +70.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2632.0% | -4.1% | -57.6% | -22.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9800.0% | +106.7% | +13.1% | -8.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | +1.3% | -26.3% | +19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLFD and CCOI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCOI is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSSI's 3.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs CCOI's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.50x | 1.79x | 1.67x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.94 | $46.76 | $55.24 | $18.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.80 | $24.01 | $14.82 | $7.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.6% | +80.2% | +29.5% | +77.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 57.1 | 34.3 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 146K | 1.2M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", CCOI as "Hold", ADTN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.5% upside for CCOI (target: $28) vs -5.3% for TSSI (target: $15). CCOI is the only dividend payer here at 19.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $43.00 | $27.50 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 32 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +19.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +3.2% | +2.0% | 0.0% |
ADTN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TSSI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
TSSI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs ADTN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSSI or CLFD or CCOI or ADTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TSS, Inc.
(TSSI) is the stronger pick with 65. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 8% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). TSS, Inc. (TSSI) offers the better valuation at 26. 0x trailing P/E (47. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TSSI or CLFD or CCOI or ADTN?
On forward P/E, ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 29. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TSSI or CLFD or CCOI or ADTN?
Over the past 5 years, TSS, Inc.
(TSSI) delivered a total return of +26. 3%, compared to -57. 6% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSSI returned +98. 0% versus ADTN's -8. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TSSI or CLFD or CCOI or ADTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
(CCOI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus TSS, Inc. 's 3. 50β — meaning TSSI is approximately 109% more volatile than CCOI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 54% for TSS, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TSSI or CLFD or CCOI or ADTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TSS, Inc.
(TSSI) is pulling ahead at 65. 9% versus -5. 8% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TSS, Inc. grew EPS 154. 2% year-over-year, compared to 11. 6% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSSI leads at 100. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TSSI or CLFD or CCOI or ADTN?
TSS, Inc.
(TSSI) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus -18. 7% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSSI leads at 4. 3% versus -10. 6% for CCOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADTN leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TSSI or CLFD or CCOI or ADTN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
(ADTN) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 42. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCOI: 68. 5% to $27. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TSSI or CLFD or CCOI or ADTN?
In this comparison, CCOI (19.
2% yield) pays a dividend. TSSI, CLFD, ADTN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TSSI or CLFD or CCOI or ADTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
(CCOI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (19. 2% yield). TSS, Inc. (TSSI) carries a higher beta of 3. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCOI: +13. 1%, TSSI: +98. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TSSI and CLFD and CCOI and ADTN?
These companies operate in different sectors (TSSI (Technology) and CLFD (Technology) and CCOI (Communication Services) and ADTN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TSSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCOI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ADTN is a small-cap high-growth stock. CCOI pays a dividend while TSSI, CLFD, ADTN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Dividend Yield > 7.6%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.