Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TTI vs COP vs DVN vs OXY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
TTI vs COP vs DVN vs OXY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $1.32B | $140.02B | $28.19B | $53.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $630M | $58.31B | $12.24B | $23.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $7.32B | $2.15B | $4.71B |
| Gross Margin | 24.6% | 29.2% | 21.8% | 26.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 18.3% | 18.9% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 41.4x | 13.3x | 8.6x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $263M | $23.44B | $8.78B | $23.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $6.50B | $1.43B | $1.99B |
TTI vs COP vs DVN vs OXY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TETRA Technologies,… (TTI) | 100 | 2959.1 | +2859.1% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 272.4 | +172.4% |
| Devon Energy Corpor… (DVN) | 100 | 419.6 | +319.6% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 416.6 | +316.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTI vs COP vs DVN vs OXY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +246.3% vs COP's +34.7%
COP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 233.4% 10Y total return vs TTI's 96.4%
- Beta 0.08, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
DVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth -8.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 56.6%, current ratio 0.98x
- 10.0% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 13.0x)
OXY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -0.13, yield 3.0%
- 20.3% margin vs TTI's 1.2%
- 3.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COP's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.0% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.3% margin vs TTI's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs TTI's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COP's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +246.3% vs COP's +34.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs TTI's 1.1%, ROIC 12.3% vs 9.5% |
TTI vs COP vs DVN vs OXY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TTI vs COP vs DVN vs OXY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DVN leads in 2 of 6 categories
TTI leads 1 • OXY leads 1 • COP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — COP and OXY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COP is the larger business by revenue, generating $58.3B annually — 92.5x TTI's $630M. OXY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTI's 1.2%. On growth, TTI holds the edge at -0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $630M | $58.3B | $12.2B | $23.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $22.4B | $5.0B | $10.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $7.3B | $2.1B | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $18.3B | $2.1B | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +29.2% | +21.8% | +26.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +18.3% | +18.9% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +12.6% | +17.6% | +20.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +31.4% | +16.8% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.6% | -2.5% | -99.9% | -23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -20.2% | -100.0% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, DVN trades at a 98% valuation discount to TTI's 439.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DVN's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTI's 15.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $140.0B | $28.2B | $53.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $157.0B | $35.5B | $75.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 439.86x | 18.09x | 10.80x | 33.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.38x | 13.29x | 8.62x | 12.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.93x | 6.77x | 4.79x | 6.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.09x | 2.38x | 1.65x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.67x | 2.23x | 1.84x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 67.62x | 8.35x | 9.04x | 13.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DVN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DVN delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $3 for TTI. COP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTI's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COP scores 6/9 vs OXY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +11.3% | +18.6% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +6.0% | +9.1% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.5% | +10.4% | +12.3% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +10.4% | +13.8% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.93x | 0.36x | 0.57x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $218M | $16.9B | $7.3B | $22.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $6.5B | $1.4B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $263M | $23.4B | $8.8B | $24.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.96x | 9.42x | 7.98x | 3.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTI five years ago would be worth $28,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,927 for OXY. Over the past 12 months, TTI leads with a +246.3% total return vs COP's +34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTI at 48.9% vs OXY's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.3% | +19.7% | +20.4% | +27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +246.3% | +34.7% | +52.9% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.9% | +23.7% | -2.0% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +183.0% | +131.9% | +120.1% | +109.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.4% | +233.4% | +99.0% | -7.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.9% | +7.3% | -0.7% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DVN and OXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OXY is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTI's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DVN currently trades 86.0% from its 52-week high vs TTI's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.08x | 0.05x | -0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.54 | $135.87 | $52.71 | $67.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.63 | $84.28 | $29.70 | $38.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +84.6% | +86.0% | +80.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 43.4 | 43.5 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 9.6M | 15.3M | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
OXY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTI as "Buy", COP as "Buy", DVN as "Buy", OXY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for TTI (target: $12) vs 5.0% for OXY (target: $57). For income investors, OXY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.95% vs DVN's 2.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.25 | $127.07 | $53.78 | $56.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 52 | 64 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.19 | $0.98 | $1.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
DVN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TTI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TTI vs COP vs DVN vs OXY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTI or COP or DVN or OXY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) is the stronger pick with 10.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTI or COP or DVN or OXY?
On trailing P/E, Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) is the cheapest at 10.
8x versus TETRA Technologies, Inc. at 439. 9x. On forward P/E, Devon Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTI or COP or DVN or OXY?
Over the past 5 years, TETRA Technologies, Inc.
(TTI) delivered a total return of +183. 0%, compared to +109. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +233. 4% versus OXY's -7. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTI or COP or DVN or OXY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
13β versus TETRA Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning TTI is approximately -1186% more volatile than OXY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ConocoPhillips (COP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 93% for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTI or COP or DVN or OXY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) is pulling ahead at 10.
0% versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Devon Energy Corporation grew EPS -8. 1% year-over-year, compared to -97. 3% for TETRA Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTI leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTI or COP or DVN or OXY?
Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
4% net margin versus 0. 5% for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DVN leads at 22. 0% versus 9. 4% for TTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OXY leads at 33. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTI or COP or DVN or OXY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) trades at 8.
6x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — 32. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTI: 25. 4% to $12. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTI or COP or DVN or OXY?
In this comparison, OXY (3.
0% yield), COP (2. 8% yield), DVN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TTI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TTI or COP or DVN or OXY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
13), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OXY: -7. 7%, TTI: +96. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTI and COP and DVN and OXY?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DVN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. COP, DVN, OXY pay a dividend while TTI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.