Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $3M | $1.32B | $866M | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $536M | $315M | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $34M | $-42M | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 3.6% | 33.5% | 50.4% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -42.2% | 11.2% | -2.7% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.4x | 5.1x | 17.6x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $175M | $188M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $7M | $10M | $474M |
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo Energy, S.A. … (TURB) | 100 | 61.6 | -38.4% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 43.0 | -57.0% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 49.5 | -50.5% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TURB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SHLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 42.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 19.1% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1%
- +66.5% vs TURB's -43.3%
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 17.6x)
ENPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 17.4% 10Y total return vs TURB's -70.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- 9.6% margin vs TURB's -35.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 17.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs TURB's -35.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs SPWR's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.5% vs TURB's -43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs TURB's -23.9%, ROIC 6.8% vs -42.0% |
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ENPH leads 1 • TURB leads 0 • SPWR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SHLS and SPWR and ENPH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 148.7x TURB's $9M. ENPH is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TURB's -35.4%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $536M | $315M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $73M | -$6M | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $34M | -$42M | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$77M | -$15M | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +33.5% | +50.4% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.2% | +11.2% | -2.7% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +6.3% | -13.2% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | -14.5% | -4.6% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.2% | +74.9% | -0.2% | -20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | — | -101.3% | -127.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TURB and SPWR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.5x trailing earnings, ENPH trades at a 30% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENPH's 22.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $1.3B | $866M | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $1.5B | $1.0B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.85x | 39.20x | -15.25x | 27.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.40x | 5.10x | 17.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.83x | — | 22.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 2.77x | 2.80x | 3.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 2.20x | — | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 48.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-85 for TURB. SHLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TURB's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENPH scores 6/9 vs TURB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.7% | +5.7% | — | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.9% | +3.7% | -19.5% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.0% | +5.9% | -5.3% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -89.9% | +7.6% | -7.2% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 0.29x | — | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $168M | $179M | $769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $7M | $10M | $474M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $175M | $188M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.39x | 5.91x | -1.57x | 47.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TURB five years ago would be worth $2,974 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, SHLS leads with a +66.5% total return vs TURB's -43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHLS at -26.5% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.3% | -13.8% | -38.2% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.3% | +66.5% | -42.4% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -60.2% | -81.3% | -78.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -72.8% | -81.3% | -71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -74.7% | -81.3% | +1737.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.3% | -26.5% | -42.8% | -39.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TURB and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TURB is the less volatile stock with a -1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWR's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 69.0% from its 52-week high vs TURB's 7.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.26x | 2.08x | 2.13x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.45 | $11.36 | $2.27 | $54.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $3.81 | $0.81 | $25.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.3% | +69.0% | +44.9% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.0 | 63.2 | 45.9 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 5.1M | 1.7M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHLS as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", ENPH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 22.6% for ENPH (target: $43).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.83 | $15.81 | $43.48 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 45 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% |
SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). ENPH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH?
On trailing P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the cheapest at 27. 5x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH?
Over the past 5 years, Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) delivered a total return of -70. 3%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus SPWR's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 26β versus SunPower Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning SPWR is approximately -269% more volatile than TURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 2% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enphase Energy, Inc. grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH?
Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -35. 4% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -42. 2% for TURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 26)). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TURB: -70. 3%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TURB and SHLS and SPWR and ENPH?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TURB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.