Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TUYA vs SMRT vs ARLO vs ZBRA vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Security & Protection Services
Communication Equipment
Specialty Retail
TUYA vs SMRT vs ARLO vs ZBRA vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Communication Equipment | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.42B | $219M | $1.62B | $11.25B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $318M | $150M | $561M | $5.40B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $-25M | $31M | $419M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 47.7% | 34.4% | 45.1% | 47.3% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | -1.0% | 2.7% | 14.5% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | — | 18.5x | 12.8x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $7M | $7M | $2.82B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $653M | $105M | $146M | $125M | $86.81B |
TUYA vs SMRT vs ARLO vs ZBRA vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tuya Inc. (TUYA) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 237.3 | +137.3% |
| Zebra Technologies … (ZBRA) | 100 | 47.1 | -52.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 175.3 | +75.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TUYA vs SMRT vs ARLO vs ZBRA vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TUYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 107.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs SMRT's -12.9%
- 2.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, SMRT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ARLO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.48
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 5.3%, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 1.48, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 1.48 vs ZBRA's 1.87, lower leverage
ZBRA is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 34.8x)
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ARLO's -32.6%
- 12.2% margin vs SMRT's -16.6%
- +43.7% vs ZBRA's -11.1%
- 11.5% ROA vs SMRT's -7.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs -19.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs SMRT's -12.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs SMRT's -16.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs ZBRA's 1.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs ZBRA's -11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs SMRT's -7.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs -19.6% |
TUYA vs SMRT vs ARLO vs ZBRA vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TUYA vs SMRT vs ARLO vs ZBRA vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
TUYA leads 0 • SMRT leads 0 • ARLO leads 0 • ZBRA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 4962.9x SMRT's $150M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMRT's -16.6%. On growth, ARLO holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $318M | $150M | $561M | $5.4B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $5M | $18M | $968M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | -$25M | $31M | $419M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$16M | $64M | $831M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.7% | +34.4% | +45.1% | +47.3% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -1.0% | +2.7% | +14.5% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -16.6% | +5.5% | +7.8% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | -10.9% | +11.5% | +15.4% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | -6.4% | +26.3% | +10.6% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +90.5% | — | -55.7% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SMRT and ZBRA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.9x trailing earnings, ZBRA trades at a 90% valuation discount to TUYA's 282.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZBRA's 14.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARLO's 148.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $219M | $1.6B | $11.2B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $770M | $122M | $1.5B | $13.9B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 282.35x | -3.56x | 106.43x | 27.95x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.20x | — | 18.51x | 12.83x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 148.35x | 14.15x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.75x | 1.44x | 3.07x | 2.08x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 0.93x | 12.84x | 3.26x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.61x | — | 24.27x | 13.53x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TUYA and AMZN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SMRT. TUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZBRA's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TUYA scores 7/9 vs SMRT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | -10.6% | +22.9% | +11.7% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -7.6% | +9.1% | +4.9% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.5% | -19.6% | +35.9% | +10.6% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.8% | -12.4% | +4.7% | +12.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x | 0.05x | 0.78x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$649M | -$97M | -$140M | $2.7B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $653M | $105M | $146M | $125M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $7M | $7M | $2.8B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -78.29x | — | 4.17x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARLO five years ago would be worth $22,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,046 for SMRT. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs ZBRA's -11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SMRT's -24.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.4% | -40.9% | +12.6% | -7.9% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.8% | +21.9% | +43.3% | -11.1% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | -57.5% | +116.3% | -17.7% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.9% | -89.5% | +123.1% | -53.2% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | -86.8% | -32.6% | +265.3% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.2% | -24.8% | +29.3% | -6.3% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARLO and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARLO is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZBRA's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SMRT's 51.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.78x | 1.48x | 1.87x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.95 | $2.20 | $19.94 | $352.66 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.99 | $0.72 | $10.20 | $199.05 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +51.8% | +74.7% | +64.8% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 29.9 | 54.0 | 56.1 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 905K | 1.3M | 710K | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TUYA as "Buy", SMRT as "Hold", ARLO as "Buy", ZBRA as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SMRT (target: $4) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). TUYA is the only dividend payer here at 2.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.69 | $4.00 | $17.50 | $311.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +5.2% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
TUYA vs SMRT vs ARLO vs ZBRA vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TUYA or SMRT or ARLO or ZBRA or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT). Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tuya Inc. (TUYA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TUYA or SMRT or ARLO or ZBRA or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) is the cheapest at 27.
9x versus Tuya Inc. at 282. 4x. On forward P/E, Zebra Technologies Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TUYA or SMRT or ARLO or ZBRA or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) delivered a total return of +123. 1%, compared to -89. 5% for SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus TUYA's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TUYA or SMRT or ARLO or ZBRA or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Zebra Technologies Corporation's 1. 87β — meaning ZBRA is approximately 27% more volatile than ARLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tuya Inc. (TUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 78% for Zebra Technologies Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TUYA or SMRT or ARLO or ZBRA or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus -12. 9% for SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arlo Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 145. 2% year-over-year, compared to -88. 2% for SmartRent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TUYA or SMRT or ARLO or ZBRA or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -39. 8% for SmartRent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZBRA leads at 14. 8% versus -24. 7% for SMRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TUYA or SMRT or ARLO or ZBRA or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) trades at 12.
8x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 21. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMRT: 250. 9% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TUYA or SMRT or ARLO or ZBRA or AMZN?
In this comparison, TUYA (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SMRT, ARLO, ZBRA, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TUYA or SMRT or ARLO or ZBRA or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, SMRT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TUYA and SMRT and ARLO and ZBRA and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (TUYA (Technology) and SMRT (Technology) and ARLO (Industrials) and ZBRA (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TUYA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZBRA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. TUYA pays a dividend while SMRT, ARLO, ZBRA, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.