TWI vs GT vs MCFT vs REVG vs TITN

For growth investors, REV Group, Inc.

(REVG) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 5% for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT). REV Group, Inc. (REVG) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, REV Group, Inc.

(REVG) is the cheapest at 33. 8x versus MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. at 59. 6x. On forward P/E, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.

(REVG) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to -65. 1% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REVG returned +174. 2% versus GT's -68. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

96β versus Titan International, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning TWI is approximately 86% more volatile than GT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REV Group, Inc. (REVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), REV Group, Inc.

(REVG) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -22. 5% for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -6. 5% year-over-year, compared to -26. 0% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, TITN leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

REV Group, Inc.

(REVG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 9% net margin versus -9. 4% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REVG leads at 7. 8% versus -0. 1% for TITN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCFT leads at 20. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.

(MCFT) trades at 17. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 7x for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TWI: 62. 5% to $13. 00.

In this comparison, REVG (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. TWI, GT, MCFT, TITN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

96)). Titan International, Inc. (TWI) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GT: -68. 6%, TWI: +36. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TWI (Industrials) and GT (Consumer Cyclical) and MCFT (Consumer Cyclical) and REVG (Industrials) and TITN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.