Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TYL vs PAYC vs PCTY vs ORCL vs NOW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
TYL vs PAYC vs PCTY vs ORCL vs NOW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $13.96B | $7.51B | $5.93B | $559.27B | $96.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.38B | $2.09B | $1.73B | $64.08B | $13.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $316M | $470M | $258M | $16.21B | $1.76B |
| Gross Margin | 45.6% | 81.0% | 69.3% | 66.4% | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 28.3% | 21.3% | 30.8% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 25.6x | 12.6x | 14.3x | 26.2x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $676M | $152M | $218M | $104.10B | $3.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.02B | $370M | $398M | $10.79B | $3.73B |
TYL vs PAYC vs PCTY vs ORCL vs NOW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Technologies,… (TYL) | 100 | 86.5 | -13.5% |
| Paycom Software, In… (PAYC) | 100 | 46.0 | -54.0% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 85.4 | -14.6% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 364.4 | +264.4% |
| ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) | 100 | 23.5 | -76.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TYL vs PAYC vs PCTY vs ORCL vs NOW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, TYL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PAYC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.59, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.09x
- Lower P/E (12.6x vs 26.2x), PEG 0.47 vs 3.69
- 1.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ORCL's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PCTY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 17.7%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 0.43 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage
ORCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 425.1% 10Y total return vs PAYC's 271.8%
- 25.3% margin vs NOW's 12.6%
- +31.6% vs NOW's -90.5%
NOW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- PEG 0.32 vs ORCL's 3.69
- 20.9% revenue growth vs ORCL's 8.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.9% revenue growth vs ORCL's 8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 26.2x), PEG 0.47 vs 3.69 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs NOW's 12.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ORCL's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.6% vs NOW's -90.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs PCTY's 4.9%, ROIC 30.7% vs 26.2% |
TYL vs PAYC vs PCTY vs ORCL vs NOW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TYL vs PAYC vs PCTY vs ORCL vs NOW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ORCL leads 1 • TYL leads 0 • PCTY leads 0 • NOW leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ORCL and NOW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.1B annually — 37.1x PCTY's $1.7B. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NOW's 12.6%. On growth, NOW holds the edge at +22.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $2.1B | $1.7B | $64.1B | $14.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $501M | $780M | $394M | $26.5B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $316M | $470M | $258M | $16.2B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $688M | $444M | $470M | -$24.7B | $4.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +81.0% | +69.3% | +66.4% | +76.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +28.3% | +21.3% | +30.8% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +22.4% | +14.9% | +25.3% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +21.2% | +27.2% | -38.6% | +33.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | +7.8% | +10.5% | +21.7% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +22.6% | +26.7% | +24.5% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PAYC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, PAYC trades at a 69% valuation discount to NOW's 56.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAYC offers better value at 0.64x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.0B | $7.5B | $5.9B | $559.3B | $97.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.6B | $7.3B | $5.8B | $652.6B | $96.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 45.98x | 17.13x | 27.14x | 44.82x | 56.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.65x | 12.56x | 14.29x | 26.18x | 21.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.14x | 0.64x | 0.96x | 6.31x | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.94x | 9.81x | 14.25x | 27.36x | 37.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.99x | 3.66x | 3.72x | 9.74x | 7.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.92x | 4.49x | 5.00x | 26.59x | 7.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.90x | 18.41x | 17.31x | — | 21.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $9 for TYL. PAYC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs NOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | +31.0% | +22.4% | +56.3% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | +9.1% | +4.9% | +8.1% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +30.7% | +26.2% | +12.8% | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +27.1% | +23.3% | +14.4% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.09x | 0.18x | 4.96x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$339M | -$218M | -$180M | $93.3B | -$523M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $370M | $398M | $10.8B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $676M | $152M | $218M | $104.1B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 78.85x | 95.85x | 23.29x | 5.44x | 185.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORCL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,935 for NOW. Over the past 12 months, ORCL leads with a +31.6% total return vs NOW's -90.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORCL at 27.3% vs NOW's -40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.0% | -8.9% | -25.1% | -0.1% | -36.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.6% | -38.8% | -40.6% | +31.6% | -90.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.5% | -47.8% | -37.1% | +106.5% | -78.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | -56.3% | -35.2% | +151.8% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.5% | +271.8% | +218.2% | +425.1% | +38.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.1% | -19.5% | -14.3% | +27.3% | -40.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PCTY and ORCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ORCL currently trades 56.3% from its 52-week high vs NOW's 8.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.49x | 0.39x | 1.58x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $621.34 | $267.76 | $201.97 | $345.72 | $1057.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $283.72 | $104.90 | $92.99 | $134.57 | $81.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.3% | +51.7% | +54.0% | +56.3% | +8.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 49.8 | 45.7 | 68.5 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 491K | 1.4M | 733K | 26.3M | 21.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PAYC and ORCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TYL as "Buy", PAYC as "Hold", PCTY as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy", NOW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.7% upside for NOW (target: $154) vs 9.6% for PAYC (target: $152). For income investors, PAYC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs ORCL's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $453.45 | $151.75 | $147.73 | $257.09 | $154.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 36 | 41 | 86 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | — | 18 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.51 | — | $1.65 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.3% | +2.5% | +0.3% | +1.9% |
PAYC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ORCL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
TYL vs PAYC vs PCTY vs ORCL vs NOW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TYL or PAYC or PCTY or ORCL or NOW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ServiceNow, Inc.
(NOW) is the stronger pick with 20. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 4% for Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TYL or PAYC or PCTY or ORCL or NOW?
On trailing P/E, Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus ServiceNow, Inc. at 56. 0x. On forward P/E, Paycom Software, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ServiceNow, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TYL or PAYC or PCTY or ORCL or NOW?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to -80. 6% for ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +428. 7% versus NOW's +35. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TYL or PAYC or PCTY or ORCL or NOW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning ORCL is approximately 305% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TYL or PAYC or PCTY or ORCL or NOW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceNow, Inc.
(NOW) is pulling ahead at 20. 9% versus 8. 4% for Oracle Corporation (ORCL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServiceNow, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -9. 4% for Paycom Software, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCTY leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TYL or PAYC or PCTY or ORCL or NOW?
Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 13. 2% for ServiceNow, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus 13. 7% for NOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAYC leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TYL or PAYC or PCTY or ORCL or NOW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Oracle Corporation — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NOW: 64. 7% to $154. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — TYL or PAYC or PCTY or ORCL or NOW?
In this comparison, PAYC (1.
1% yield), ORCL (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TYL, PCTY, NOW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TYL or PAYC or PCTY or ORCL or NOW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), 1. 1% yield, +267. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAYC: +267. 8%, NOW: +35. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TYL and PAYC and PCTY and ORCL and NOW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TYL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PAYC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NOW is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PAYC, ORCL pay a dividend while TYL, PCTY, NOW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.