Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UCL vs GSAT vs TNXP vs SHEN vs TMUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Biotechnology
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
UCL vs GSAT vs TNXP vs SHEN vs TMUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Biotechnology | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $43M | $10.33B | $31M | $898M | $210.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $262M | $10M | $266M | $90.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-50M | $-99M | $-36M | $10.54B |
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 57.2% | 34.3% | 37.9% | 54.3% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 1.4% | -9.7% | -10.3% | 20.4% |
| Forward P/E | 104.6x | — | — | — | 18.5x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $542M | $5M | $642M | $122.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $391M | $99M | $27M | $5.60B |
UCL vs GSAT vs TNXP vs SHEN vs TMUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| uCloudlink Group In… (UCL) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1662.9 | +1562.9% |
| Tonix Pharmaceutica… (TNXP) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 32.9 | -67.1% |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 100 | 186.5 | +86.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UCL vs GSAT vs TNXP vs SHEN vs TMUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.61, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.61 vs TNXP's 3.21
- 11.9% ROA vs TNXP's -39.3%, ROIC 363.4% vs -150.3%
GSAT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +305.2% vs TNXP's -28.8%
TNXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.9%, EPS growth 97.2%
- 29.9% revenue growth vs UCL's 7.1%
SHEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
TMUS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 407.2% 10Y total return vs GSAT's 201.8%
- PEG 0.62 vs UCL's 2.27
- Better valuation composite
- 11.6% margin vs TNXP's -9.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.9% revenue growth vs UCL's 7.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.6% margin vs TNXP's -9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs TNXP's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GSAT's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +305.2% vs TNXP's -28.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs TNXP's -39.3%, ROIC 363.4% vs -150.3% |
UCL vs GSAT vs TNXP vs SHEN vs TMUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UCL vs GSAT vs TNXP vs SHEN vs TMUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UCL leads in 2 of 6 categories
GSAT leads 1 • TMUS leads 1 • TNXP leads 0 • SHEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GSAT and TMUS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.5B annually — 8790.2x TNXP's $10M. TMUS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TNXP's -9.6%. On growth, TNXP holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $262M | $10M | $266M | $90.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $236,000 | $93M | -$98M | $104M | $29.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$50M | -$99M | -$36M | $10.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $151M | -$78M | -$276M | $10.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.8% | +57.2% | +34.3% | +37.9% | +54.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +1.4% | -9.7% | -10.3% | +20.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | -19.0% | -9.6% | -13.7% | +11.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +57.6% | -7.6% | -103.5% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | +2.1% | +16.6% | -100.0% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | -121.9% | -14.6% | -18.2% | -12.0% |
Valuation Metrics
UCL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.9x trailing earnings, UCL trades at a 95% valuation discount to TMUS's 20.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UCL offers better value at 0.02x vs TMUS's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $10.3B | $31M | $898M | $210.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $10.5B | -$63M | $1.5B | $326.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.95x | -138.10x | -0.08x | -22.86x | 19.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 104.59x | — | — | — | 18.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.02x | — | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.39x | 119.09x | — | 13.80x | 10.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 41.28x | 3.05x | 2.51x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 28.58x | 0.22x | 0.92x | 3.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.27x | 57.85x | — | — | 20.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UCL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCL delivers a 32.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-43 for TNXP. TNXP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMUS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMUS scores 6/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.4% | -13.7% | -42.9% | -3.7% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | -2.3% | -39.3% | -2.0% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | -0.1% | -150.3% | -1.1% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.8% | -0.1% | -97.6% | -1.3% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.51x | 0.04x | 0.66x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $151M | -$93M | $614M | $116.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $391M | $99M | $27M | $5.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $542M | $5M | $642M | $122.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.37x | -0.07x | — | -0.65x | 5.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $49,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for TNXP. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +305.2% total return vs TNXP's -28.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.1% vs TNXP's -89.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.3% | +27.3% | -17.7% | +43.5% | -2.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.6% | +305.2% | -28.8% | +41.3% | -21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | +484.1% | -99.9% | -13.6% | +40.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | +393.8% | -100.0% | -27.9% | +45.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | +201.8% | -100.0% | +21.6% | +407.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.3% | +80.1% | -89.0% | -4.8% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GSAT and TMUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMUS is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TNXP's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSAT currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs TNXP's 19.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 2.08x | 3.21x | 0.89x | -0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $82.85 | $69.97 | $17.34 | $261.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $17.24 | $11.60 | $9.66 | $181.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.2% | +98.3% | +19.5% | +93.6% | +74.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.1 | 66.4 | 58.9 | 55.2 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 1.5M | 413K | 300K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
TMUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GSAT as "Hold", TNXP as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy", TMUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -19.0% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, TMUS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.88% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $66.00 | — | $29.00 | $254.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 7 | 8 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | +0.7% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.08 | — | $0.12 | $3.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.7% |
UCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GSAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
UCL vs GSAT vs TNXP vs SHEN vs TMUS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UCL or GSAT or TNXP or SHEN or TMUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp.
(TNXP) is the stronger pick with 29. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E (104. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UCL or GSAT or TNXP or SHEN or TMUS?
On trailing P/E, uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the cheapest at 0. 9x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. at 20. 0x. On forward P/E, T-Mobile US, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: T-Mobile US, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus uCloudlink Group Inc. 's 2. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UCL or GSAT or TNXP or SHEN or TMUS?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +393. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMUS returned +407. 2% versus TNXP's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UCL or GSAT or TNXP or SHEN or TMUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. 's 3. 21β — meaning TNXP is approximately -1246% more volatile than TMUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UCL or GSAT or TNXP or SHEN or TMUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp.
(TNXP) is pulling ahead at 29. 9% versus 7. 1% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: uCloudlink Group Inc. grew EPS 1479% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Globalstar, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GSAT leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UCL or GSAT or TNXP or SHEN or TMUS?
T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -1288. 3% for Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMUS leads at 21. 2% versus -1354. 3% for TNXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSAT leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UCL or GSAT or TNXP or SHEN or TMUS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus uCloudlink Group Inc. 's 2. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) trades at 18. 5x forward P/E versus 104. 6x for uCloudlink Group Inc. — 86. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78. 7% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UCL or GSAT or TNXP or SHEN or TMUS?
In this comparison, TMUS (1.
9% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. UCL, TNXP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UCL or GSAT or TNXP or SHEN or TMUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 1. 9% yield, +407. 2% 10Y return). Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +407. 2%, TNXP: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UCL and GSAT and TNXP and SHEN and TMUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (UCL (Communication Services) and GSAT (Communication Services) and TNXP (Healthcare) and SHEN (Communication Services) and TMUS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UCL is a small-cap deep-value stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TNXP is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TMUS is a large-cap quality compounder stock. SHEN, TMUS pay a dividend while UCL, GSAT, TNXP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.