Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UCL vs QCOM vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
UCL vs QCOM vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $43M | $213.51B | $138.57B | $9.78B | $1.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $44.49B | $8.19B | $4.04B | $68.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $9.92B | $2.67B | $361M | $24.97B |
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 54.8% | 51.0% | 41.1% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 25.5% | 16.1% | 9.4% | 40.9% |
| Forward P/E | 104.6x | 18.8x | 41.7x | 13.8x | 36.5x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $16.37B | $4.47B | $1.20B | $65.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $7.84B | $2.64B | $1.16B | $16.18B |
UCL vs QCOM vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| uCloudlink Group In… (UCL) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 456.4 | +356.4% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1307.2 | +1207.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UCL vs QCOM vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UCL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.61 vs MRVL's 2.21
QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 18.4% ROA vs SWKS's 4.6%, ROIC 29.1% vs 6.3%
MRVL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 42.1%, EPS growth 401.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 42.1% revenue growth vs SWKS's -2.2%
- +184.6% vs UCL's -2.6%
SWKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 20.9%, current ratio 2.33x
- Beta 1.36, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.33x
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 41.7x)
AVGO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 29.0% 10Y total return vs MRVL's 15.8%
- PEG 0.73 vs QCOM's 9.06
- 36.6% margin vs SWKS's 8.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.1% revenue growth vs SWKS's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 41.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs SWKS's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs MRVL's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +184.6% vs UCL's -2.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs SWKS's 4.6%, ROIC 29.1% vs 6.3% |
UCL vs QCOM vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UCL vs QCOM vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
UCL leads 2 • QCOM leads 0 • MRVL leads 0 • SWKS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 801.1x UCL's $85M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SWKS's 8.9%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $44.5B | $8.2B | $4.0B | $68.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $236,000 | $12.8B | $2.3B | $842M | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $9.9B | $2.7B | $361M | $25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $12.5B | $1.4B | $697M | $28.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.8% | +54.8% | +51.0% | +41.1% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +25.5% | +16.1% | +9.4% | +40.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +22.3% | +32.6% | +8.9% | +36.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +28.1% | +17.0% | +17.2% | +42.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | -3.5% | +22.1% | -1.0% | +29.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | +173.0% | +100.0% | -44.2% | +31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
UCL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.9x trailing earnings, UCL trades at a 99% valuation discount to AVGO's 86.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UCL offers better value at 0.02x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $213.5B | $138.6B | $9.8B | $1.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $222.0B | $140.4B | $9.8B | $2.00T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.95x | 40.43x | 52.12x | 21.12x | 86.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 104.59x | 18.84x | 41.72x | 13.79x | 36.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.02x | 19.44x | — | — | 1.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.39x | 15.91x | 106.14x | 10.20x | 58.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 4.82x | 16.91x | 2.39x | 30.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 10.56x | 9.73x | 1.75x | 24.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.27x | 16.65x | 99.24x | 8.85x | 72.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UCL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $6 for SWKS. SWKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.4% | +40.2% | +19.4% | +6.3% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | +18.4% | +12.6% | +4.6% | +14.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +29.1% | +6.0% | +6.3% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.8% | +28.9% | +7.1% | +7.0% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.77x | 0.31x | 0.21x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $8.5B | $1.8B | $42M | $49.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $7.8B | $2.6B | $1.2B | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $16.4B | $4.5B | $1.2B | $65.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.37x | 17.60x | 15.17x | 14.46x | 9.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $93,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,065 for UCL. Over the past 12 months, MRVL leads with a +184.6% total return vs UCL's -2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 88.2% vs UCL's -35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.3% | +17.6% | +79.1% | +2.1% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.6% | +42.9% | +184.6% | +1.5% | +102.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | +96.4% | +291.9% | -30.3% | +566.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | +58.5% | +250.8% | -55.5% | +833.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | +350.2% | +1581.3% | +31.2% | +2897.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.3% | +25.2% | +57.7% | -11.4% | +88.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UCL and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UCL is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVGO currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs UCL's 27.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 1.55x | 2.21x | 1.36x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $223.66 | $175.79 | $90.90 | $437.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $121.99 | $53.78 | $51.92 | $198.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.2% | +90.6% | +91.0% | +71.6% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.1 | 80.1 | 78.5 | 55.9 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 15.1M | 24.8M | 3.3M | 23.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QCOM and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QCOM as "Hold", MRVL as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs -19.1% for MRVL (target: $130). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.29% vs MRVL's 0.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $175.00 | $129.52 | $62.75 | $443.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 69 | 72 | 59 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +0.1% | +4.3% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 23 | 0 | 12 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.44 | $0.24 | $2.79 | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% | +1.5% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). UCL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
UCL vs QCOM vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UCL or QCOM or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the stronger pick with 42. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E (104. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) a "Buy" — based on 72 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UCL or QCOM or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?
On trailing P/E, uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the cheapest at 0. 9x versus Broadcom Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Broadcom Inc. wins at 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UCL or QCOM or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) delivered a total return of +833. 6%, compared to -89. 3% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +29. 0% versus UCL's -93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UCL or QCOM or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Marvell Technology, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning MRVL is approximately 260% more volatile than UCL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UCL or QCOM or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is pulling ahead at 42. 1% versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: uCloudlink Group Inc. grew EPS 1479% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UCL or QCOM or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus 5. 0% for uCloudlink Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus 4. 8% for UCL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UCL or QCOM or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 104. 6x for uCloudlink Group Inc. — 90. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 7. 6% to $443. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — UCL or QCOM or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
3% yield), QCOM (1. 7% yield), AVGO (0. 6% yield), MRVL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. UCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UCL or QCOM or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61)). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UCL: -93. 4%, AVGO: +29. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UCL and QCOM and MRVL and SWKS and AVGO?
These companies operate in different sectors (UCL (Communication Services) and QCOM (Technology) and MRVL (Technology) and SWKS (Technology) and AVGO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UCL is a small-cap deep-value stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock. QCOM, SWKS, AVGO pay a dividend while UCL, MRVL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.