Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs BCC vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Construction Materials
Construction
UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs BCC vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | REIT - Specialty | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Construction Materials | Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.69B | $17.09B | $5.93B | $2.59B | $8.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.19B | $6.92B | $2.71B | $6.37B | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $264M | $397M | $146M | $110M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 16.6% | 13.4% | 21.8% | 11.2% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 7.7% | 8.3% | 2.5% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 84.8x | 28.7x | 19.7x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $230M | $5.57B | $401M | $522M | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $925M | $464M | $292M | $477M | $182M |
UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs BCC vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 184.3 | +84.3% |
| Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
| Louisiana-Pacific C… (LPX) | 100 | 307.0 | +207.0% |
| Boise Cascade Compa… (BCC) | 100 | 218.2 | +118.2% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 384.6 | +284.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs BCC vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UFPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 7.4%, current ratio 4.59x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.7%, current ratio 4.59x
- 1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs WY's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
WY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.1%
- -3.1% FFO/revenue growth vs LPX's -7.9%
- 5.7% margin vs BCC's 1.7%
- Beta 0.51 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
LPX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BCC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BLDR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs BCC's 367.3%
- PEG 1.67 vs UFPI's 3.50
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 19.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% FFO/revenue growth vs LPX's -7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 19.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs BCC's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs WY's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.0% vs BLDR's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 11.4% vs 2.4% |
UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs BCC vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs BCC vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WY leads in 2 of 6 categories
BLDR leads 1 • UFPI leads 1 • LPX leads 0 • BCC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 5.5x LPX's $2.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.7% (WY) to 1.7% (BCC). On growth, WY holds the edge at -2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $6.9B | $2.7B | $6.4B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $498M | $1.0B | $367M | $322M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $264M | $397M | $146M | $110M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $298M | $516M | $92M | $78M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +13.4% | +21.8% | +11.2% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +7.7% | +8.3% | +2.5% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +5.7% | +5.4% | +1.7% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +7.5% | +3.4% | +1.2% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | -2.0% | -16.6% | -2.5% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.5% | +100.0% | -112.4% | -52.8% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.5x trailing earnings, UFPI trades at a 69% valuation discount to WY's 52.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BLDR offers better value at 2.43x vs UFPI's 3.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $17.1B | $5.9B | $2.6B | $8.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $22.2B | $6.0B | $2.6B | $13.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.51x | 52.67x | 33.53x | 20.49x | 19.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.99x | 84.83x | 28.68x | 19.70x | 13.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.62x | — | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.56x | 22.79x | 14.91x | 7.79x | 9.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 2.47x | 2.19x | 0.40x | 0.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.58x | 1.81x | 2.82x | 1.29x | 1.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.96x | 194.19x | 65.15x | 203.41x | 9.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LPX delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for WY. UFPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLDR's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LPX scores 5/9 vs WY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +4.2% | +8.4% | +5.3% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +2.4% | +5.6% | +4.4% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +2.4% | +11.0% | +6.6% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.2% | +3.0% | +11.3% | +6.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.59x | 0.23x | 0.25x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$695M | $5.1B | $109M | $45M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $925M | $464M | $292M | $477M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $230M | $5.6B | $401M | $522M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 43.92x | 1.95x | 14.25x | 13.53x | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WY and BCC and BLDR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLDR five years ago would be worth $15,198 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for WY. Over the past 12 months, WY leads with a -5.0% total return vs BLDR's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCC at 7.7% vs BLDR's -12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | +0.5% | -14.3% | -2.4% | -28.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.8% | -5.0% | -19.0% | -21.0% | -33.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | -11.5% | +17.9% | +24.9% | -33.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.3% | -20.8% | +6.9% | +41.2% | +52.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +228.4% | +14.4% | +324.3% | +367.3% | +560.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | -4.0% | +5.6% | +7.7% | -12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
WY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WY is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WY currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.51x | 1.20x | 1.12x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $118.00 | $27.86 | $102.86 | $95.72 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.06 | $21.16 | $68.63 | $65.14 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +85.1% | +67.8% | +75.4% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.0 | 38.4 | 38.9 | 37.3 | 29.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 379K | 5.1M | 973K | 398K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UFPI and WY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UFPI as "Buy", WY as "Buy", LPX as "Buy", BCC as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs 24.8% for UFPI (target: $103). For income investors, WY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.54% vs BCC's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.00 | $29.83 | $102.00 | $103.00 | $109.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 25 | 23 | 12 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +3.5% | +1.6% | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $0.84 | $1.11 | $0.94 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.2% | +0.9% | +1.0% | +7.1% | +5.0% |
WY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs BCC vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UFPI or WY or LPX or BCC or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger pick with -3.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UFPI or WY or LPX or BCC or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the cheapest at 16. 5x versus Weyerhaeuser Company at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Builders FirstSource, Inc. wins at 1. 67x versus UFP Industries, Inc. 's 3. 50x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UFPI or WY or LPX or BCC or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) delivered a total return of +52. 0%, compared to -20. 8% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLDR returned +560. 4% versus WY's +15. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UFPI or WY or LPX or BCC or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 222% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 130% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UFPI or WY or LPX or BCC or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is pulling ahead at -3.
1% versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weyerhaeuser Company grew EPS -16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BCC leads at -8. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UFPI or WY or LPX or BCC or BLDR?
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
4% net margin versus 2. 1% for Boise Cascade Company — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LPX leads at 9. 6% versus 2. 8% for BCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLDR leads at 29. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UFPI or WY or LPX or BCC or BLDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 67x versus UFP Industries, Inc. 's 3. 50x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 84. 8x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 71. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 47. 4% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — UFPI or WY or LPX or BCC or BLDR?
In this comparison, WY (3.
5% yield), UFPI (1. 7% yield), LPX (1. 6% yield), BCC (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UFPI or WY or LPX or BCC or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 3. 5% yield). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +15. 2%, BLDR: +560. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UFPI and WY and LPX and BCC and BLDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (UFPI (Basic Materials) and WY (Real Estate) and LPX (Basic Materials) and BCC (Basic Materials) and BLDR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LPX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. UFPI, WY, LPX, BCC pay a dividend while BLDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.