Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UFPT vs PFBC vs HAFC vs EWBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
UFPT vs PFBC vs HAFC vs EWBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.71B | $1.15B | $908M | $16.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $603M | $499M | $445M | $4.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $68M | $134M | $76M | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 28.3% | 55.0% | 57.5% | 60.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 38.0% | 24.3% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | 23.3x | 8.9x | 9.6x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $154M | $384M | $280M | $3.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $807M | $213M | $656M |
UFPT vs PFBC vs HAFC vs EWBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| UFP Technologies, I… (UFPT) | 100 | 489.6 | +389.6% |
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 252.1 | +152.1% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
| East West Bancorp, … (EWBC) | 100 | 348.9 | +248.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UFPT vs PFBC vs HAFC vs EWBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UFPT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.5%, EPS growth 15.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.4%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs EWBC's 281.4%
- 19.5% revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
- 10.5% ROA vs HAFC's 1.0%, ROIC 12.7% vs 7.4%
PFBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
- PEG 0.51 vs HAFC's 0.76
- Beta 0.69, yield 3.1%, current ratio 149.60x
HAFC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EWBC's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
EWBC is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.
- 28.3% margin vs UFPT's 11.3%
- +42.7% vs UFPT's +0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.5% revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.51 vs 0.60 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.3% margin vs UFPT's 11.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs EWBC's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EWBC's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs UFPT's +0.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs HAFC's 1.0%, ROIC 12.7% vs 7.4% |
UFPT vs PFBC vs HAFC vs EWBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UFPT vs PFBC vs HAFC vs EWBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFBC leads in 1 of 6 categories
UFPT leads 1 • EWBC leads 1 • HAFC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PFBC and EWBC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EWBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 10.5x HAFC's $445M. EWBC is the more profitable business, keeping 28.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UFPT's 11.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $603M | $499M | $445M | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $116M | $191M | $110M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $68M | $134M | $76M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $167M | $204M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | +55.0% | +57.5% | +60.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +38.0% | +24.3% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +26.8% | +17.1% | +28.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +33.4% | +45.8% | +32.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +24.0% | +20.7% | +21.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 64% valuation discount to UFPT's 25.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFBC offers better value at 0.52x vs HAFC's 0.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $1.2B | $908M | $16.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $730M | $976M | $19.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.24x | 9.10x | 12.10x | 12.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.31x | 8.91x | 9.61x | 11.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | 0.52x | 0.95x | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.91x | 3.85x | 8.59x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.83x | 2.31x | 2.04x | 3.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.08x | 1.54x | 1.15x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.62x | 6.92x | 4.46x | 11.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPT delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $10 for HAFC. HAFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFBC's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs PFBC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | +17.3% | +9.8% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.5% | +1.8% | +1.0% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.7% | +13.5% | +7.4% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.1% | +4.4% | +2.5% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.49x | 0.35x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $134M | -$423M | $68M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $807M | $213M | $656M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154M | $384M | $280M | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.42x | 0.88x | 0.62x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EWBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UFPT five years ago would be worth $40,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,664 for PFBC. Over the past 12 months, EWBC leads with a +42.7% total return vs UFPT's +0.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EWBC at 42.2% vs UFPT's 15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.9% | +0.4% | +15.2% | +7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.8% | +20.9% | +36.9% | +42.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.3% | +126.1% | +137.2% | +187.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +306.1% | +56.6% | +64.7% | +68.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +785.4% | +256.1% | +76.5% | +281.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | +31.3% | +33.4% | +42.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFBC and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EWBC's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAFC currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs UFPT's 80.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.69x | 0.92x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $274.93 | $103.05 | $31.27 | $127.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $173.88 | $79.60 | $21.84 | $86.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.5% | +91.9% | +97.2% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 59.1 | 64.1 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 203K | 102K | 265K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HAFC and EWBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UFPT as "Buy", PFBC as "Buy", HAFC as "Hold", EWBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.6% upside for UFPT (target: $298) vs 7.2% for EWBC (target: $131). For income investors, HAFC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.57% vs EWBC's 1.97%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $298.00 | $102.00 | $35.00 | $130.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 | 11 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% | +3.6% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.98 | $1.09 | $2.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.1% | +1.0% | +0.7% |
PFBC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). UFPT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
UFPT vs PFBC vs HAFC vs EWBC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UFPT or PFBC or HAFC or EWBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UFP Technologies, Inc.
(UFPT) is the stronger pick with 19. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UFPT or PFBC or HAFC or EWBC?
On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.
1x versus UFP Technologies, Inc. at 25. 2x. On forward P/E, Preferred Bank is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Preferred Bank wins at 0. 51x versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UFPT or PFBC or HAFC or EWBC?
Over the past 5 years, UFP Technologies, Inc.
(UFPT) delivered a total return of +306. 1%, compared to +56. 6% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UFPT returned +785. 4% versus HAFC's +76. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UFPT or PFBC or HAFC or EWBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus East West Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning EWBC is approximately 75% more volatile than PFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 49% for Preferred Bank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UFPT or PFBC or HAFC or EWBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UFP Technologies, Inc.
(UFPT) is pulling ahead at 19. 5% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hanmi Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 4% year-over-year, compared to 7. 9% for Preferred Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UFPT or PFBC or HAFC or EWBC?
East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 11. 3% for UFP Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFBC leads at 38. 0% versus 15. 3% for UFPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EWBC leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UFPT or PFBC or HAFC or EWBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Preferred Bank (PFBC) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 3x for UFP Technologies, Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UFPT: 34. 6% to $298. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UFPT or PFBC or HAFC or EWBC?
In this comparison, HAFC (3.
6% yield), PFBC (3. 1% yield), EWBC (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. UFPT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UFPT or PFBC or HAFC or EWBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 3. 1% yield, +256. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFBC: +256. 1%, EWBC: +281. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UFPT and PFBC and HAFC and EWBC?
These companies operate in different sectors (UFPT (Healthcare) and PFBC (Financial Services) and HAFC (Financial Services) and EWBC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UFPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; EWBC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. PFBC, HAFC, EWBC pay a dividend while UFPT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.