UGRO vs HYFM vs GRWG vs SMG

For growth investors, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is the stronger pick with -3.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 5% for urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO). The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) offers the better valuation at 25. 3x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) delivered a total return of -69.

1%, compared to -99. 8% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMG returned +34. 9% versus HYFM's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.

(HYFM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus urban-gro, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning UGRO is approximately 58% more volatile than HYFM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GrowGeneration Corp. (GRWG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 76% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is pulling ahead at -3.

9% versus -56. 5% for urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company grew EPS 504. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1. 9% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMG leads at -4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

3% net margin versus -129. 4% for urban-gro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMG leads at 10. 5% versus -77. 1% for UGRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMG leads at 30. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UGRO: 1345.

7% to $81. 25.

In this comparison, SMG (4.

2% yield) pays a dividend. UGRO, HYFM, GRWG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

10), 4. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMG: +34. 9%, UGRO: -91. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (UGRO (Industrials) and HYFM (Industrials) and GRWG (Consumer Cyclical) and SMG (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYFM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SMG pays a dividend while UGRO, HYFM, GRWG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.