Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UGRO vs LAUR vs STRA vs GRWG vs PRDO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Specialty Retail
Education & Training Services
UGRO vs LAUR vs STRA vs GRWG vs PRDO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $3M | $4.59B | $1.80B | $85M | $2.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $1.74B | $1.27B | $162M | $855M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $280M | $130M | $-24M | $170M |
| Gross Margin | -1.0% | 26.9% | 37.4% | 26.8% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | -77.1% | 24.0% | 14.0% | -15.7% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.3x | 11.0x | — | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $847M | $109M | $29M | $105M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $147M | $141M | $30M | $132M |
UGRO vs LAUR vs STRA vs GRWG vs PRDO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO) | 100 | 25.3 | -74.7% |
| Laureate Education,… (LAUR) | 100 | 330.6 | +230.6% |
| Strategic Education… (STRA) | 100 | 46.6 | -53.4% |
| GrowGeneration Corp. (GRWG) | 100 | 21.5 | -78.5% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 211.5 | +111.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UGRO vs LAUR vs STRA vs GRWG vs PRDO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UGRO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LAUR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +40.7% vs UGRO's -48.0%
STRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.46 vs PRDO's 1.77
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 12.0x), PEG 1.46 vs 1.77
- 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, GRWG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
- Rev growth 24.2%, EPS growth 10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs LAUR's 216.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.2% revenue growth vs UGRO's -56.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 12.0x), PEG 1.46 vs 1.77 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs UGRO's -127.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs UGRO's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.7% vs UGRO's -48.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs UGRO's -24.5% |
UGRO vs LAUR vs STRA vs GRWG vs PRDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UGRO vs LAUR vs STRA vs GRWG vs PRDO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 3 of 6 categories
STRA leads 1 • UGRO leads 0 • LAUR leads 0 • GRWG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAUR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 99.9x UGRO's $17M. PRDO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UGRO's -127.0%. On growth, UGRO holds the edge at +32.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $1.7B | $1.3B | $162M | $855M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $535M | $216M | -$14M | $247M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $280M | $130M | -$24M | $170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $542,573 | $264M | $174M | -$10M | $221M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +26.9% | +37.4% | +26.8% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -77.1% | +24.0% | +14.0% | -15.7% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -127.0% | +16.1% | +10.2% | -14.9% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +15.2% | +13.7% | -6.2% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | +15.4% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.5% | -15.4% | +19.4% | +69.2% | +30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
STRA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 16% valuation discount to LAUR's 17.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STRA offers better value at 1.94x vs PRDO's 2.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $4.6B | $1.8B | $85M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $668,152 | $5.3B | $1.8B | $84M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | 17.02x | 14.59x | -3.55x | 14.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.26x | 11.01x | — | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.94x | — | 2.09x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.77x | 7.22x | — | 8.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 2.70x | 1.42x | 0.53x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.02x | 1.10x | 0.87x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.47x | 17.45x | 11.68x | — | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LAUR and STRA each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAUR delivers a 25.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-23 for GRWG. STRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAUR's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRA scores 8/9 vs LAUR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +25.4% | +7.9% | -22.9% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.5% | +12.9% | +6.2% | -15.2% | +13.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +20.3% | +9.0% | -16.9% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +26.7% | +10.7% | -18.8% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.71x | 0.07x | 0.30x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $701M | -$32M | -$929,000 | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $147M | $141M | $30M | $132M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $847M | $109M | $29M | $105M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.57x | 34.91x | — | — | 50.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAUR five years ago would be worth $30,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $278 for UGRO. Over the past 12 months, LAUR leads with a +40.7% total return vs UGRO's -48.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs UGRO's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | -3.4% | +1.4% | -7.8% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.0% | +40.7% | -7.8% | +25.7% | +15.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +175.1% | +3.8% | -62.0% | +195.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +200.4% | +17.8% | -96.7% | +198.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | +216.8% | +114.9% | -75.7% | +505.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.6% | +40.1% | +1.3% | -27.6% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UGRO's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs UGRO's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.59x | 0.48x | 1.27x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.93 | $37.91 | $93.45 | $2.40 | $38.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $21.16 | $69.70 | $0.87 | $26.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +84.9% | +84.6% | +59.2% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.7 | 49.6 | 47.3 | 63.2 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 1.9M | 315K | 476K | 584K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STRA and PRDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UGRO as "Buy", LAUR as "Buy", STRA as "Buy", PRDO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1345.7% upside for UGRO (target: $81) vs -12.9% for PRDO (target: $30). For income investors, STRA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs PRDO's 1.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $81.25 | $39.00 | $87.00 | — | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 11 | 18 | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +3.2% | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | $2.52 | — | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.7% | +7.7% | 0.0% | +5.6% |
PRDO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). STRA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UGRO vs LAUR vs STRA vs GRWG vs PRDO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UGRO or LAUR or STRA or GRWG or PRDO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 5% for urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UGRO or LAUR or STRA or GRWG or PRDO?
On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Laureate Education, Inc. at 17. 0x. On forward P/E, Strategic Education, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Strategic Education, Inc. wins at 1. 46x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UGRO or LAUR or STRA or GRWG or PRDO?
Over the past 5 years, Laureate Education, Inc.
(LAUR) delivered a total return of +200. 4%, compared to -97. 2% for urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +505. 6% versus UGRO's -91. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UGRO or LAUR or STRA or GRWG or PRDO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus urban-gro, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning UGRO is approximately 198% more volatile than PRDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 71% for Laureate Education, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UGRO or LAUR or STRA or GRWG or PRDO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.
2% versus -56. 5% for urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GrowGeneration Corp. grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Laureate Education, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAUR leads at 11. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UGRO or LAUR or STRA or GRWG or PRDO?
Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus -129. 4% for urban-gro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAUR leads at 25. 3% versus -77. 1% for UGRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UGRO or LAUR or STRA or GRWG or PRDO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 46x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Laureate Education, Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UGRO: 1345. 7% to $81. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — UGRO or LAUR or STRA or GRWG or PRDO?
In this comparison, STRA (3.
2% yield), PRDO (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. UGRO, LAUR, GRWG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UGRO or LAUR or STRA or GRWG or PRDO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 1. 6% yield, +505. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +505. 6%, UGRO: -91. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UGRO and LAUR and STRA and GRWG and PRDO?
These companies operate in different sectors (UGRO (Industrials) and LAUR (Consumer Defensive) and STRA (Consumer Defensive) and GRWG (Consumer Cyclical) and PRDO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAUR is a small-cap deep-value stock; STRA is a small-cap deep-value stock; GRWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock. STRA, PRDO pay a dividend while UGRO, LAUR, GRWG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.