Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UGRO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GRWG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Specialty Retail
UGRO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GRWG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $3M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $85M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $72M | $71M | $162M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | -1.0% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 26.8% |
| Operating Margin | -77.1% | -121.4% | -405.7% | -15.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $8M | $8.76B | $32M | $29M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $30M |
UGRO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GRWG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
| GrowGeneration Corp. (GRWG) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UGRO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GRWG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UGRO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs GRWG's -75.7%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs UGRO's -56.5%
- +158.1% vs UGRO's -48.0%
GRWG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.27
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 30.2%, current ratio 3.99x
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 3.99x
- -14.9% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs UGRO's -56.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -14.9% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs UGRO's -48.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -12.6% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -47.1% vs -0.1% |
UGRO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GRWG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UGRO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GRWG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPIR leads in 1 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 1 • UGRO leads 0 • GRWG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — UGRO and ASTS and GRWG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRWG is the larger business by revenue, generating $162M annually — 9.3x UGRO's $17M. GRWG is the more profitable business, keeping -14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $72M | $71M | $162M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$74M | -$237M | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $542,573 | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +26.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -77.1% | -121.4% | -4.1% | -15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -127.0% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.5% | +59.5% | -55.6% | +69.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UGRO and ASTS and GRWG each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $85M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $668,152 | $513.8B | $16.8B | $84M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | 10.01x | -48.76x | -3.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.56x | 5.68x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.47x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASTS delivers a -21.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-21 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GRWG's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GRWG scores 6/9 vs ASTS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -88.4% | -21.1% | -22.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.5% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.1% | -47.1% | -16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -0.1% | -10.0% | -18.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | -$929,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $8.8B | $32M | $29M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.57x | 9.20x | -21.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $278 for UGRO. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs UGRO's -48.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs UGRO's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.0% | +73.1% | +158.1% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | -62.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -96.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | -78.8% | +568.8% | -75.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.6% | +43.9% | +134.8% | -27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPIR and GRWG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRWG is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs UGRO's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.93 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $2.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $0.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +59.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.7 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 1.6M | 14.9M | 476K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UGRO as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1345.7% upside for UGRO (target: $81) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $81.25 | $17.25 | $103.65 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SPIR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
UGRO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GRWG: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UGRO or SPIR or ASTS or GRWG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 5% for urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UGRO or SPIR or ASTS or GRWG?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -97. 2% for urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus UGRO's -91. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UGRO or SPIR or ASTS or GRWG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GrowGeneration Corp.
(GRWG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 130% more volatile than GRWG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for GrowGeneration Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UGRO or SPIR or ASTS or GRWG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -56. 5% for urban-gro, Inc. (UGRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 30. 9% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UGRO or SPIR or ASTS or GRWG?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRWG leads at -15. 7% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UGRO or SPIR or ASTS or GRWG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is UGRO or SPIR or ASTS or GRWG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GrowGeneration Corp.
(GRWG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27)). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRWG: -75. 7%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UGRO and SPIR and ASTS and GRWG?
These companies operate in different sectors (UGRO (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and GRWG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GRWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.