Residential Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UHG vs GRBK vs TMHC vs SKY vs CVCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
UHG vs GRBK vs TMHC vs SKY vs CVCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $45M | $2.83B | $5.56B | $4.05B | $4.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $407M | $2.10B | $7.61B | $2.64B | $2.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $313M | $672M | $214M | $269M |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 30.5% | 22.4% | 26.3% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.0% | 19.5% | 13.2% | 9.8% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.0x | 11.2x | 19.4x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $335M | $2.36B | $131M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $191M | $851M | $610M | $356M |
UHG vs GRBK vs TMHC vs SKY vs CVCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Homes Group,… (UHG) | 100 | 12.5 | -87.5% |
| Green Brick Partner… (GRBK) | 100 | 297.4 | +197.4% |
| Taylor Morrison Hom… (TMHC) | 100 | 197.1 | +97.1% |
| Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) | 100 | 168.4 | +68.4% |
| Cavco Industries, I… (CVCO) | 100 | 224.7 | +124.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UHG vs GRBK vs TMHC vs SKY vs CVCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, UHG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GRBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs CVCO's 448.0%
- 14.9% margin vs UHG's -4.0%
- 0.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +10.5% vs UHG's -30.7%
TMHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.92
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 37.4%, current ratio 6.24x
- PEG 0.34 vs CVCO's 0.98
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 6.24x
SKY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 22.7% revenue growth vs UHG's -12.3%
CVCO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 18.2% ROA vs UHG's -5.8%, ROIC 19.4% vs -0.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs UHG's -12.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 20.2x), PEG 0.34 vs 0.98 | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs UHG's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs CVCO's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.5% vs UHG's -30.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.2% ROA vs UHG's -5.8%, ROIC 19.4% vs -0.0% |
UHG vs GRBK vs TMHC vs SKY vs CVCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UHG vs GRBK vs TMHC vs SKY vs CVCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GRBK leads in 3 of 6 categories
TMHC leads 2 • CVCO leads 1 • UHG leads 0 • SKY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.6B annually — 18.7x UHG's $407M. GRBK is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UHG's -4.0%. On growth, CVCO holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $407M | $2.1B | $7.6B | $2.6B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $415M | $1.0B | $306M | $221M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $313M | $672M | $214M | $269M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | $208M | $710M | $260M | $205M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +30.5% | +22.4% | +26.3% | +23.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +19.5% | +13.2% | +9.8% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +14.9% | +8.8% | +8.1% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +9.9% | +9.3% | +9.9% | +9.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.5% | -2.6% | -26.8% | +1.8% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | -22.9% | -51.2% | -3.0% | -19.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TMHC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.7x trailing earnings, TMHC trades at a 67% valuation discount to CVCO's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TMHC offers better value at 0.23x vs CVCO's 1.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $2.8B | $5.6B | $4.1B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $167M | $3.0B | $7.1B | $3.6B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.36x | 9.29x | 7.65x | 21.43x | 23.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.98x | 11.22x | 19.44x | 20.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.36x | 0.23x | 0.78x | 1.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 69.83x | 7.19x | 6.18x | 12.69x | 20.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 1.35x | 0.68x | 1.63x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 1.49x | 0.95x | 2.76x | 3.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.60x | 6.88x | 21.29x | 29.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-23 for UHG. CVCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UHG's 2.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKY scores 7/9 vs UHG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.3% | +17.0% | +10.8% | +13.4% | +24.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.8% | +13.0% | +6.9% | +10.1% | +18.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | +15.4% | +11.0% | +16.9% | +19.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | +19.1% | +13.2% | +14.8% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.57x | 0.17x | 0.37x | 0.08x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $122M | $144M | $1.5B | -$479M | -$311M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $191M | $851M | $610M | $356M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $335M | $2.4B | $131M | $45M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.08x | — | 19.94x | 51.32x | 211.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GRBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GRBK five years ago would be worth $25,408 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,253 for UHG. Over the past 12 months, GRBK leads with a +10.5% total return vs UHG's -30.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVCO at 16.4% vs UHG's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.3% | +3.9% | +1.1% | -13.7% | -18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.7% | +10.5% | +2.0% | -16.3% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | +31.2% | +37.4% | -2.6% | +57.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.5% | +154.1% | +85.7% | +64.0% | +123.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.5% | +742.1% | +321.2% | +714.5% | +448.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.2% | +9.5% | +11.2% | -0.9% | +16.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TMHC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVCO's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TMHC currently trades 82.0% from its 52-week high vs UHG's 25.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.06x | 0.92x | 0.96x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.78 | $80.97 | $72.50 | $99.17 | $713.01 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $56.85 | $54.58 | $59.44 | $393.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.5% | +81.1% | +82.0% | +73.9% | +67.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 47.0 | 49.0 | 46.0 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 136K | 200K | 1.1M | 500K | 142K |
Analyst Outlook
GRBK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GRBK as "Hold", TMHC as "Buy", SKY as "Buy", CVCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.7% upside for SKY (target: $106) vs -1.5% for CVCO (target: $475).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $73.75 | $106.00 | $475.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 30 | 8 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.07 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +6.9% | +2.0% | +3.3% |
GRBK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TMHC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
UHG vs GRBK vs TMHC vs SKY vs CVCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UHG or GRBK or TMHC or SKY or CVCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 3% for United Homes Group, Inc. (UHG). Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UHG or GRBK or TMHC or SKY or CVCO?
On trailing P/E, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is the cheapest at 7.
7x versus Cavco Industries, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Green Brick Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taylor Morrison Home Corporation wins at 0. 34x versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 0. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UHG or GRBK or TMHC or SKY or CVCO?
Over the past 5 years, Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(GRBK) delivered a total return of +154. 1%, compared to -87. 5% for United Homes Group, Inc. (UHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRBK returned +742. 1% versus UHG's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UHG or GRBK or TMHC or SKY or CVCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
92β versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning CVCO is approximately 30% more volatile than TMHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for United Homes Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UHG or GRBK or TMHC or SKY or CVCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -12. 3% for United Homes Group, Inc. (UHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Champion Homes, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -131. 1% for United Homes Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVCO leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UHG or GRBK or TMHC or SKY or CVCO?
Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(GRBK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 9% net margin versus -4. 0% for United Homes Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRBK leads at 19. 5% versus -0. 0% for UHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRBK leads at 30. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UHG or GRBK or TMHC or SKY or CVCO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 0. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Cavco Industries, Inc. — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKY: 44. 7% to $106. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UHG or GRBK or TMHC or SKY or CVCO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is UHG or GRBK or TMHC or SKY or CVCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96), +714. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKY: +714. 5%, UHG: -87. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UHG and GRBK and TMHC and SKY and CVCO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UHG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; TMHC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKY is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.