Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UI vs NTGR vs CIEN vs CALX vs ARLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
Software - Application
Security & Protection Services
UI vs NTGR vs CIEN vs CALX vs ARLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $56.06B | $708M | $76.14B | $2.81B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.97B | $690M | $5.12B | $1.06B | $561M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $889M | $-40M | $229M | $34M | $31M |
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | 37.5% | 40.6% | 57.1% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 35.1% | -4.4% | 8.2% | 3.8% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 57.5x | 129.4x | 87.5x | 24.5x | 18.5x |
| Total Debt | $297M | $51M | $1.58B | $26M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $150M | $210M | $1.09B | $143M | $146M |
UI vs NTGR vs CIEN vs CALX vs ARLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) | 100 | 502.5 | +402.5% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Ciena Corporation (CIEN) | 100 | 974.0 | +874.0% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 308.7 | +208.7% |
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 674.2 | +574.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UI vs NTGR vs CIEN vs CALX vs ARLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 33.4%, EPS growth 103.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- 33.4% revenue growth vs NTGR's 2.9%
- 29.9% margin vs NTGR's -5.8%
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, NTGR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CIEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 32.3% 10Y total return vs UI's 24.0%
- +6.3% vs NTGR's -9.7%
CALX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 4.24x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 4.24x
- Beta 0.99 vs CIEN's 2.46, lower leverage
ARLO is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (18.5x vs 24.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.4% revenue growth vs NTGR's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.5x vs 24.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.9% margin vs NTGR's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs CIEN's 2.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs NTGR's -9.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 55.3% ROA vs NTGR's -4.9%, ROIC 81.4% vs -8.4% |
UI vs NTGR vs CIEN vs CALX vs ARLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UI vs NTGR vs CIEN vs CALX vs ARLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UI leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTGR leads 1 • CIEN leads 1 • CALX leads 1 • ARLO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 9.1x ARLO's $561M. UI is the more profitable business, keeping 29.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTGR's -5.8%. On growth, UI holds the edge at +35.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $690M | $5.1B | $1.1B | $561M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | -$19M | $571M | $57M | $18M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $889M | -$40M | $229M | $34M | $31M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $708M | -$11M | $742M | $109M | $64M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.4% | +37.5% | +40.6% | +57.1% | +45.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | -4.4% | +8.2% | +3.8% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | -5.8% | +4.5% | +3.2% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | -1.6% | +14.5% | +10.3% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.8% | -2.0% | +33.1% | +27.1% | +26.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.8% | -123.8% | +2.3% | +3.3% | — |
Valuation Metrics
NTGR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 78.8x trailing earnings, UI trades at a 88% valuation discount to CIEN's 633.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UI's 65.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CIEN's 169.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56.1B | $708M | $76.1B | $2.8B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56.2B | $549M | $76.6B | $2.7B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 78.80x | -22.71x | 633.25x | 167.38x | 106.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.54x | 129.45x | 87.54x | 24.49x | 18.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.19x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 65.50x | — | 169.86x | 69.62x | 148.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 21.79x | 1.02x | 15.96x | 2.81x | 3.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 83.94x | 1.50x | 28.64x | 3.57x | 12.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 89.35x | — | 114.44x | 24.34x | 24.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UI delivers a 87.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $88 in annual profit, vs $-8 for NTGR. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIEN's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIEN scores 8/9 vs NTGR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +87.5% | -8.0% | +8.3% | +4.2% | +22.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +55.3% | -4.9% | +4.0% | +3.5% | +9.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +81.4% | -8.4% | +6.9% | +2.1% | +35.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +102.9% | -6.0% | +6.8% | +2.5% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.10x | 0.58x | 0.03x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $148M | -$159M | $490M | -$118M | -$140M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $150M | $210M | $1.1B | $143M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $297M | $51M | $1.6B | $26M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 77.93x | — | 3.94x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIEN five years ago would be worth $99,918 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,704 for NTGR. Over the past 12 months, CIEN leads with a +633.9% total return vs NTGR's -9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIEN at 130.7% vs CALX's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.8% | +6.5% | +118.8% | -18.8% | +12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +164.4% | -9.7% | +633.9% | +3.3% | +43.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +385.7% | +86.5% | +1127.8% | +2.1% | +116.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +234.9% | -33.0% | +899.2% | -9.3% | +123.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2397.3% | -37.7% | +3230.8% | +513.0% | -32.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +69.4% | +23.1% | +130.7% | +0.7% | +29.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CIEN and CALX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CALX is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIEN's 2.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIEN currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs CALX's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 1.39x | 2.46x | 0.99x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1099.99 | $36.86 | $583.77 | $71.22 | $19.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $342.27 | $19.00 | $70.77 | $40.75 | $10.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.2% | +70.2% | +92.2% | +61.1% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.8 | 56.1 | 71.3 | 43.3 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 93K | 515K | 2.8M | 918K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
CALX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UI as "Hold", NTGR as "Hold", CIEN as "Buy", CALX as "Buy", ARLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for CALX (target: $61) vs -43.1% for UI (target: $527). UI is the only dividend payer here at 0.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $527.00 | $36.00 | $334.17 | $61.00 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 17 | 41 | 21 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.40 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +7.2% | +0.4% | +3.3% | +2.8% |
UI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTGR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
UI vs NTGR vs CIEN vs CALX vs ARLO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UI or NTGR or CIEN or CALX or ARLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is the stronger pick with 33. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) offers the better valuation at 78. 8x trailing P/E (57. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ciena Corporation (CIEN) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UI or NTGR or CIEN or CALX or ARLO?
On trailing P/E, Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is the cheapest at 78. 8x versus Ciena Corporation at 633. 2x. On forward P/E, Arlo Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UI or NTGR or CIEN or CALX or ARLO?
Over the past 5 years, Ciena Corporation (CIEN) delivered a total return of +899.
2%, compared to -33. 0% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIEN returned +32. 3% versus NTGR's -37. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UI or NTGR or CIEN or CALX or ARLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Ciena Corporation's 2. 46β — meaning CIEN is approximately 148% more volatile than CALX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 58% for Ciena Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UI or NTGR or CIEN or CALX or ARLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is pulling ahead at 33. 4% versus 2. 9% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -371. 4% for NETGEAR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UI leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UI or NTGR or CIEN or CALX or ARLO?
Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -4. 7% for NETGEAR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UI leads at 32. 5% versus -5. 1% for NTGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CALX leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UI or NTGR or CIEN or CALX or ARLO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) trades at 18. 5x forward P/E versus 129. 4x for NETGEAR, Inc. — 110. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 40. 2% to $61. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UI or NTGR or CIEN or CALX or ARLO?
In this comparison, UI (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. NTGR, CIEN, CALX, ARLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UI or NTGR or CIEN or CALX or ARLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +513. 0% 10Y return). Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALX: +513. 0%, UI: +24. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UI and NTGR and CIEN and CALX and ARLO?
These companies operate in different sectors (UI (Technology) and NTGR (Technology) and CIEN (Technology) and CALX (Technology) and ARLO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIEN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.