ULY
Urgent.ly Inc. Common Stock
Software - Application
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-87.2%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ULY vs CAAS vs APTV vs ROAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.+39.4%
APTV
Aptiv PLC
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$12.08B
5Y Perf.-15.7%
ROAD
Construction Partners, Inc.
Engineering & Construction
Market Cap$7.27B
5Y Perf.+249.5%
ULY vs CAAS vs APTV vs ROAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ULY | CAAS | APTV | ROAD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $9M | $137M | $12.08B | $7.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $128M | $696M | $20.66B | $3.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $29M | $365M | $122M |
| Gross Margin | 24.3% | 16.5% | 19.1% | 15.8% |
| Operating Margin | -8.6% | 5.9% | 5.2% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.1x | 8.7x | 46.6x |
| Total Debt | $55M | $209M | $8.09B | $1.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $142M | $1.85B | $156M |
ULY vs CAAS vs APTV vs ROAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ULY
CAAS
APTV
ROAD
| Stock | Oct 23 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urgent.ly Inc. Comm… (ULY) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
| China Automotive Sy… (CAAS) | 100 | 139.4 | +39.4% |
| Aptiv PLC (APTV) | 100 | 84.3 | -15.7% |
| Construction Partne… (ROAD) | 100 | 349.5 | +249.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ULY vs CAAS vs APTV vs ROAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CAAS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Construction Partners, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ULY
Urgent.ly Inc. Common Stock
The Specific-Use Pick
ULY plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: technology exposure
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick
CAAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 46.5%, current ratio 1.36x
- Lower P/E (7.1x vs 46.6x)
- 4.2% margin vs ULY's -19.5%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
APTV
Aptiv PLC
The Defensive Pick
APTV is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.44, current ratio 1.74x
Best for: defensive
ROAD
Construction Partners, Inc.
The Growth Play
ROAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 54.2%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 9.9% 10Y total return vs CAAS's 35.2%
- 54.2% revenue growth vs ULY's -22.6%
- +46.1% vs ULY's -47.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ROAD | 54.2% revenue growth vs ULY's -22.6% |
| Value | CAAS | Lower P/E (7.1x vs 46.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | CAAS | 4.2% margin vs ULY's -19.5% |
| Stability / Safety | CAAS | Beta 0.42 vs ULY's 1.70 |
| Dividends | CAAS | 1.6% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ROAD | +46.1% vs ULY's -47.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ROAD | 3.6% ROA vs ULY's -54.5%, ROIC 10.3% vs -76.6% |
ULY vs CAAS vs APTV vs ROAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
ULY vs CAAS vs APTV vs ROAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLROADLAGGINGAPTV
Who Leads Where
ROAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
CAAS leads 1 • ULY leads 0 • APTV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓APTVAptiv PLC
0leads
ULYUrgent.ly Inc. Common…
0leads
CAASChina Automotive Syst…
1leads
ROADConstruction Partners…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CAASvs ULYMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ROAD3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CAAS4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ROAD5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APTV is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.7B annually — 161.5x ULY's $128M. CAAS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ULY's -19.5%. On growth, ROAD holds the edge at +44.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ULYUrgent.ly Inc. Co… | CAASChina Automotive … | APTVAptiv PLC | ROADConstruction Part… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $128M | $696M | $20.7B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $60M | $1.8B | $430M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $29M | $365M | $122M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$3M | $1.1B | $187M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +16.5% | +19.1% | +15.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +5.9% | +5.2% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.5% | +4.2% | +1.8% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | -0.4% | +5.3% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | +11.1% | +5.4% | +44.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | +4.2% | +19.4% | +6.5% |
ROAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CAAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CAAS trades at a 96% valuation discount to APTV's 76.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAAS's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ROAD's 22.7x.
| Metric | ULYUrgent.ly Inc. Co… | CAASChina Automotive … | APTVAptiv PLC | ROADConstruction Part… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $137M | $12.1B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $50M | $204M | $18.3B | $8.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.14x | 3.20x | 76.10x | 71.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.09x | 8.74x | 46.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.77x | 8.42x | 22.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 0.18x | 0.59x | 2.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.30x | 1.33x | 7.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.92x | 7.90x | 47.42x |
CAAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CAAS and ROAD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROAD delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for APTV. CAAS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROAD's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APTV scores 8/9 vs ULY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ULYUrgent.ly Inc. Co… | CAASChina Automotive … | APTVAptiv PLC | ROADConstruction Part… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +7.4% | +3.8% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.5% | +3.5% | +1.7% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -76.6% | +8.8% | +5.5% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.0% | +13.9% | +6.5% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.46x | 0.85x | 1.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $41M | $67M | $6.2B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $142M | $1.9B | $156M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $209M | $8.1B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.81x | 22.18x | 6.55x | 2.56x |
Evenly matched — CAAS and ROAD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ROAD five years ago would be worth $42,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $785 for ULY. Over the past 12 months, ROAD leads with a +46.1% total return vs ULY's -47.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROAD at 67.5% vs ULY's -57.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ULYUrgent.ly Inc. Co… | CAASChina Automotive … | APTVAptiv PLC | ROADConstruction Part… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +101.5% | +5.3% | -27.2% | +17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.9% | +12.7% | -3.1% | +46.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +23.0% | -39.3% | +370.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +23.3% | -61.6% | +324.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +35.2% | +9.5% | +985.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.2% | +7.2% | -15.3% | +67.5% |
ROAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAAS and ROAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ULY's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROAD currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs ULY's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ULYUrgent.ly Inc. Co… | CAASChina Automotive … | APTVAptiv PLC | ROADConstruction Part… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 0.42x | 1.44x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.80 | $5.15 | $88.93 | $141.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.74 | $3.84 | $52.38 | $88.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.6% | +88.2% | +64.2% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 87.6 | 63.2 | 37.0 | 65.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 193K | 29K | 2.7M | 489K |
Evenly matched — CAAS and ROAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APTV as "Buy", ROAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.0% upside for APTV (target: $95) vs 4.5% for ROAD (target: $137). CAAS is the only dividend payer here at 1.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ULYUrgent.ly Inc. Co… | CAASChina Automotive … | APTVAptiv PLC | ROADConstruction Part… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $94.75 | $137.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 33 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.07 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.3% | +0.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ROAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CAAS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallConstruction Partners, Inc. (ROAD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ULY vs CAAS vs APTV vs ROAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ULY or CAAS or APTV or ROAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is the stronger pick with 54. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock (ULY). China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aptiv PLC (APTV) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ULY or CAAS or APTV or ROAD?
On trailing P/E, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Aptiv PLC at 76. 1x. On forward P/E, China Automotive Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ULY or CAAS or APTV or ROAD?
Over the past 5 years, Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) delivered a total return of +324. 4%, compared to -92. 1% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock (ULY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ROAD returned +985. 6% versus ULY's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ULY or CAAS or APTV or ROAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock's 1. 70β — meaning ULY is approximately 309% more volatile than CAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 185% for Construction Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ULY or CAAS or APTV or ROAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is pulling ahead at 54. 2% versus -22. 6% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock (ULY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Automotive Systems, Inc. grew EPS 43. 4% year-over-year, compared to -797. 7% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROAD leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ULY or CAAS or APTV or ROAD?
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -30. 8% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROAD leads at 8. 5% versus -19. 0% for ULY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ULY leads at 22. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ULY or CAAS or APTV or ROAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 46. 6x for Construction Partners, Inc. — 39. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APTV: 66. 0% to $94. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ULY or CAAS or APTV or ROAD?
In this comparison, CAAS (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ULY, APTV, ROAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ULY or CAAS or APTV or ROAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 1. 6% yield). Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock (ULY) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAAS: +35. 2%, ULY: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ULY and CAAS and APTV and ROAD?
These companies operate in different sectors (ULY (Technology) and CAAS (Consumer Cyclical) and APTV (Consumer Cyclical) and ROAD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ULY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAAS is a small-cap high-growth stock; APTV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ROAD is a small-cap high-growth stock. CAAS pays a dividend while ULY, APTV, ROAD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ULY: -9.1% · CAAS: 11.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.