Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ULY vs MNRO vs DRVN vs ORLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Parts
ULY vs MNRO vs DRVN vs ORLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Auto - Parts | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $9M | $523M | $2.26B | $79.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $128M | $1.18B | $2.17B | $18.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $-13M | $-198M | $2.60B |
| Gross Margin | 24.3% | 34.8% | 52.1% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | -8.6% | 2.3% | -7.3% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 32.4x | 10.9x | 29.2x |
| Total Debt | $55M | $529M | $4.00B | $8.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $21M | $170M | $194M |
ULY vs MNRO vs DRVN vs ORLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urgent.ly Inc. Comm… (ULY) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
| Monro, Inc. (MNRO) | 100 | 86.7 | -13.3% |
| Driven Brands Holdi… (DRVN) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| O'Reilly Automotive… (ORLY) | 100 | 151.3 | +51.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ULY vs MNRO vs DRVN vs ORLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ULY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MNRO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 6.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +45.4% vs ULY's -47.9%
DRVN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.68
- Rev growth 1.5%, EPS growth 59.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, current ratio 1.52x
- Beta 0.68, current ratio 1.52x
ORLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 431.0% 10Y total return vs DRVN's -48.5%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs ULY's -22.6%
- 14.3% margin vs ULY's -19.5%
- Beta 0.14 vs ULY's 1.70
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs ULY's -22.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 29.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.3% margin vs ULY's -19.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs ULY's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | 6.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.4% vs ULY's -47.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs ULY's -54.5%, ROIC 37.2% vs -76.6% |
ULY vs MNRO vs DRVN vs ORLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ULY vs MNRO vs DRVN vs ORLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORLY leads in 4 of 6 categories
MNRO leads 1 • DRVN leads 1 • ULY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.2B annually — 142.3x ULY's $128M. ORLY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ULY's -19.5%. On growth, ORLY holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $128M | $1.2B | $2.2B | $18.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $90M | $17M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | -$13M | -$198M | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $50M | $41M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +34.8% | +52.1% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +2.3% | -7.3% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.5% | -1.1% | -9.1% | +14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +4.2% | +1.9% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | -4.0% | -9.5% | +10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | +150.0% | +5.1% | +15.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MNRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MNRO's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DRVN's 126.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $523M | $2.3B | $79.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $50M | $1.0B | $6.1B | $87.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.14x | -79.23x | -7.55x | 31.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 32.40x | 10.90x | 29.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.41x | 126.43x | 22.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 0.44x | 0.97x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.84x | 3.63x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.96x | — | 49.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORLY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNRO delivers a -2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-28 for DRVN. MNRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DRVN's 6.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DRVN scores 6/9 vs MNRO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -2.1% | -28.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.5% | -0.8% | -4.2% | +15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -76.6% | +2.5% | -2.2% | +37.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.0% | +3.4% | -2.7% | +48.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.85x | 6.58x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $41M | $509M | $3.8B | $8.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $21M | $170M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $529M | $4.0B | $8.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.81x | 0.09x | -1.23x | 14.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORLY five years ago would be worth $25,228 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $785 for ULY. Over the past 12 months, MNRO leads with a +45.4% total return vs ULY's -47.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORLY at 14.4% vs ULY's -57.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +101.5% | -10.1% | -5.2% | +4.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.9% | +45.4% | -24.6% | +2.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | -57.7% | -51.1% | +49.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | -67.6% | -51.1% | +152.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | -62.4% | -48.5% | +431.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.2% | -24.9% | -21.2% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ORLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ORLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ULY's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ORLY currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs ULY's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 1.50x | 0.68x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.80 | $23.91 | $19.74 | $108.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.74 | $12.20 | $9.80 | $86.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.6% | +72.9% | +69.7% | +87.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 87.6 | 55.4 | 54.3 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 193K | 770K | 2.0M | 5.2M |
Analyst Outlook
DRVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNRO as "Hold", DRVN as "Buy", ORLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 129.5% upside for MNRO (target: $40) vs 17.1% for ORLY (target: $111). MNRO is the only dividend payer here at 6.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.00 | $18.00 | $110.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 15 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.12 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +2.6% |
ORLY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNRO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ULY vs MNRO vs DRVN vs ORLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ULY or MNRO or DRVN or ORLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock (ULY). O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY) offers the better valuation at 31. 8x trailing P/E (29. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Driven Brands Holdings Inc. (DRVN) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ULY or MNRO or DRVN or ORLY?
On forward P/E, Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ULY or MNRO or DRVN or ORLY?
Over the past 5 years, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) delivered a total return of +152. 3%, compared to -92. 1% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock (ULY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORLY returned +431. 0% versus ULY's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ULY or MNRO or DRVN or ORLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock's 1. 70β — meaning ULY is approximately 1091% more volatile than ORLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monro, Inc. (MNRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 7% for Driven Brands Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ULY or MNRO or DRVN or ORLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -22. 6% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock (ULY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Driven Brands Holdings Inc. grew EPS 59. 8% year-over-year, compared to -797. 7% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, DRVN leads at 16. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ULY or MNRO or DRVN or ORLY?
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus -30. 8% for Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORLY leads at 19. 5% versus -19. 0% for ULY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DRVN leads at 52. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ULY or MNRO or DRVN or ORLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
(DRVN) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 32. 4x for Monro, Inc. — 21. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNRO: 129. 5% to $40. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ULY or MNRO or DRVN or ORLY?
In this comparison, MNRO (6.
4% yield) pays a dividend. ULY, DRVN, ORLY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ULY or MNRO or DRVN or ORLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), +431. 0% 10Y return). Urgent. ly Inc. Common Stock (ULY) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORLY: +431. 0%, ULY: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ULY and MNRO and DRVN and ORLY?
These companies operate in different sectors (ULY (Technology) and MNRO (Consumer Cyclical) and DRVN (Consumer Cyclical) and ORLY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ULY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNRO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DRVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ORLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MNRO pays a dividend while ULY, DRVN, ORLY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.