Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UNCY vs ARWR vs CYCN vs RMTI vs LPCN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
UNCY vs ARWR vs CYCN vs RMTI vs LPCN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $53M | $10.92B | $14M | $31M | $13M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $622M | $2M | $17.39B | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $-301M | $-4M | $-1.61B | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.1% | 100.0% | 16.7% | -13.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -35.7% | -239.8% | -8.5% | -413.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.1x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $773K | $366M | $0.00 | $12M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $227M | $3M | $16M | $5M |
UNCY vs ARWR vs CYCN vs RMTI vs LPCN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unicycive Therapeut… (UNCY) | 100 | 28.5 | -71.5% |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR) | 100 | 112.5 | +12.5% |
| Cyclerion Therapeut… (CYCN) | 100 | 5.4 | -94.6% |
| Rockwell Medical, I… (RMTI) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Lipocine Inc. (LPCN) | 100 | 10.7 | -89.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UNCY vs ARWR vs CYCN vs RMTI vs LPCN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UNCY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 3.8% margin vs LPCN's -5.7%
- 2.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
ARWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs UNCY's -84.3%
- 232.6% revenue growth vs UNCY's -100.0%
- +496.9% vs RMTI's -30.3%
CYCN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, RMTI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LPCN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.86
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 6.68x
- Beta 0.86, current ratio 6.68x
- Beta 0.86 vs ARWR's 1.81
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 232.6% revenue growth vs UNCY's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs LPCN's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs ARWR's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +496.9% vs RMTI's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -18.1% ROA vs RMTI's -28.6%, ROIC 9.3% vs -11.0% |
UNCY vs ARWR vs CYCN vs RMTI vs LPCN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
UNCY vs ARWR vs CYCN vs RMTI vs LPCN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RMTI leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARWR leads 2 • UNCY leads 0 • CYCN leads 0 • LPCN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RMTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RMTI and UNCY operate at a comparable scale, with $17.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -9.3% (RMTI) to -5.7% (LPCN). On growth, RMTI holds the edge at +915.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $622M | $2M | $17.4B | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | -$203M | -$5M | -$1.5B | -$8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | -$301M | -$4M | -$1.6B | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$30M | -$51M | -$3M | $2M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +85.1% | +100.0% | +16.7% | -13.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -35.7% | -2.4% | -8.5% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -48.4% | -170.1% | -9.3% | -5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -8.2% | -159.8% | +0.0% | -3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -86.4% | -43.2% | +915.6% | +27.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | -133.8% | -2.2% | +9.9% | -54.3% |
Valuation Metrics
RMTI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53M | $10.9B | $14M | $31M | $13M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $11.1B | $10M | $28M | $8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.40x | -6389.34x | -2.89x | -5.21x | -1.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.14x | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 90.41x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 13.16x | 6.58x | 0.44x | 6.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.09x | 20.71x | 1.12x | 0.76x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 69.58x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CYCN delivers a -39.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-39 in annual profit, vs $-46 for RMTI. UNCY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARWR's 0.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs LPCN's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -89.1% | -55.5% | -39.2% | -45.9% | -66.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -66.0% | -18.1% | -35.6% | -28.6% | -59.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.3% | -65.1% | -11.0% | -64.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.3% | +8.8% | -55.5% | -10.1% | -58.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.73x | — | 0.34x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | $140M | -$3M | -$3M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $227M | $3M | $16M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $773,000 | $366M | $0 | $12M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -335.02x | -1.03x | — | -0.01x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARWR five years ago would be worth $11,743 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $571 for CYCN. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +496.9% total return vs RMTI's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 24.4% vs RMTI's -35.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.5% | +15.0% | +135.1% | -9.2% | -70.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.4% | +496.9% | -8.2% | -30.3% | -27.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.5% | +92.7% | -46.8% | -72.8% | -42.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.3% | +17.4% | -94.3% | -92.4% | -89.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.3% | +1253.3% | -98.7% | -99.0% | -98.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.8% | +24.4% | -19.0% | -35.2% | -16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARWR and LPCN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LPCN is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARWR's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs LPCN's 19.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.81x | 0.94x | 1.22x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $79.48 | $8.48 | $2.10 | $12.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $12.44 | $1.03 | $0.74 | $1.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.5% | +98.1% | +37.1% | +37.2% | +19.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 69.7 | 56.0 | 35.7 | 34.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 518K | 1.9M | 5.5M | 259K | 463K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UNCY as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy". UNCY is the only dividend payer here at 2.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $81.22 | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 20 | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RMTI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARWR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
UNCY vs ARWR vs CYCN vs RMTI vs LPCN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UNCY or ARWR or CYCN or RMTI or LPCN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc. (UNCY). Analysts rate Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc. (UNCY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UNCY or ARWR or CYCN or RMTI or LPCN?
Over the past 5 years, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) delivered a total return of +17. 4%, compared to -94. 3% for Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. (CYCN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1253% versus RMTI's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UNCY or ARWR or CYCN or RMTI or LPCN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lipocine Inc.
(LPCN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning ARWR is approximately 111% more volatile than LPCN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc. (UNCY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 73% for Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UNCY or ARWR or CYCN or RMTI or LPCN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus -100. 0% for Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc. (UNCY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to -495. 2% for Rockwell Medical, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CYCN leads at 91. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UNCY or ARWR or CYCN or RMTI or LPCN?
Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc.
(UNCY) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -487. 1% for Lipocine Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARWR leads at 11. 9% versus -524. 7% for LPCN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CYCN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UNCY or ARWR or CYCN or RMTI or LPCN?
In this comparison, UNCY (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ARWR, CYCN, RMTI, LPCN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is UNCY or ARWR or CYCN or RMTI or LPCN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1253% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARWR: +1253%, RMTI: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UNCY and ARWR and CYCN and RMTI and LPCN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UNCY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CYCN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RMTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LPCN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. UNCY pays a dividend while ARWR, CYCN, RMTI, LPCN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.