Insurance - Life
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UNM vs UNH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
UNM vs UNH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| Market Cap | $12.96B | $333.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.30B | $449.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $781M | $12.04B |
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.90B | $78.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $158M | $24.36B |
UNM vs UNH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unum Group (UNM) | 100 | 529.8 | +429.8% |
| UnitedHealth Group … (UNH) | 100 | 120.5 | +20.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UNM vs UNH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UNM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 35.1%
- Beta 0.48, yield 2.2%
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 20.1x)
UNH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 25 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 2.4%
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth -14.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 220.3% 10Y total return vs UNM's 175.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs UNM's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.9 vs UNH's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs UNH's 0.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 25-year raise streak, vs UNM's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.3% vs UNH's -4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs UNM's 1.6%, ROIC 9.2% vs 4.7% |
UNM vs UNH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UNM vs UNH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UNM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UNH is the larger business by revenue, generating $449.7B annually — 33.8x UNM's $13.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.9% (UNM) to 2.7% (UNH). On growth, UNM holds the edge at +9.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $449.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $23.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $781M | $12.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $539M | $19.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.9% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +4.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.0% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.0% | +0.7% |
Valuation Metrics
UNM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.8x trailing earnings, UNM trades at a 32% valuation discount to UNH's 27.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UNM's 15.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UNH's 16.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.0B | $333.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.7B | $387.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.75x | 27.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.17x | 20.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.72x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.81x | 16.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.99x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.34x | 20.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UNH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UNH delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for UNM. UNM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UNH's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UNH scores 6/9 vs UNM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +11.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $54.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $158M | $24.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $78.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.48x | 4.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UNM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UNM five years ago would be worth $29,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,746 for UNH. Over the past 12 months, UNM leads with a +3.3% total return vs UNH's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UNM at 23.9% vs UNH's -7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | +9.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.3% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.4% | -20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.1% | -2.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +175.7% | +220.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.9% | -7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
UNM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UNM is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UNH's 0.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UNM currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs UNH's 90.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $83.13 | $404.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $68.28 | $234.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 74.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
UNH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates UNM as "Hold" and UNH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for UNM (target: $98) vs 4.9% for UNH (target: $385). For income investors, UNH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.37% vs UNM's 2.21%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.00 | $385.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 20 | 25 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.77 | $8.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | +1.7% |
UNM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UNH leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook).
UNM vs UNH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UNM or UNH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) is the stronger pick with 11.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Unum Group (UNM). Unum Group (UNM) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UNM or UNH?
On trailing P/E, Unum Group (UNM) is the cheapest at 18.
8x versus UnitedHealth Group Incorporated at 27. 8x. On forward P/E, Unum Group is actually cheaper at 9. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UNM or UNH?
Over the past 5 years, Unum Group (UNM) delivered a total return of +192.
1%, compared to -2. 5% for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UNH returned +220. 3% versus UNM's +175. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UNM or UNH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Unum Group (UNM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's 0. 59β — meaning UNH is approximately 23% more volatile than UNM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Unum Group (UNM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 77% for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UNM or UNH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) is pulling ahead at 11.
8% versus 2. 1% for Unum Group (UNM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UnitedHealth Group Incorporated grew EPS -14. 7% year-over-year, compared to -54. 8% for Unum Group. Over a 3-year CAGR, UNH leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UNM or UNH?
Unum Group (UNM) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
7% net margin versus 2. 7% for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UNM leads at 7. 2% versus 4. 2% for UNH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UNM leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UNM or UNH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Unum Group (UNM) trades at 9.
2x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UNM: 22. 1% to $98. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UNM or UNH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 2. 2% for Unum Group (UNM).
09Is UNM or UNH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Unum Group (UNM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 2. 2% yield, +175. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UNM: +175. 7%, UNH: +220. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UNM and UNH?
These companies operate in different sectors (UNM (Financial Services) and UNH (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.