Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UOKA vs EXPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
UOKA vs EXPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $972K | $1.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $193K | $4.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-23M |
| Gross Margin | -14.3% | 7.0% |
| Operating Margin | -21.3% | -0.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 96.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $124M |
UOKA vs EXPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDJM Ltd (UOKA) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| eXp World Holdings,… (EXPI) | 100 | 43.2 | -56.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UOKA vs EXPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, UOKA is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
EXPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.57, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs UOKA's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% FFO/revenue growth vs UOKA's -66.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.5% margin vs UOKA's -22.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.57 vs UOKA's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.0% vs UOKA's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.1% ROA vs UOKA's -83.5%, ROIC -15.3% vs -81.6% |
UOKA vs EXPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UOKA vs EXPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXPI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 24696.5x UOKA's $193,238. EXPI is the more profitable business, keeping -0.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UOKA's -22.5%. On growth, EXPI holds the edge at +8.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $193,238 | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -14.3% | +7.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.3% | -0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.5% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.4% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -24.4% |
Valuation Metrics
EXPI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $972,403 | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$854,431 | $961M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.30x | -48.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 96.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.10x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.27x | 4.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPI delivers a -9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-121 for UOKA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXPI scores 4/9 vs UOKA's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -121.4% | -9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -83.5% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -81.6% | -15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.8% | -9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$124M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXPI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXPI five years ago would be worth $2,708 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for UOKA. Over the past 12 months, EXPI leads with a -7.0% total return vs UOKA's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXPI at -17.6% vs UOKA's -92.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -99.9% | -25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -44.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -72.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +703.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.2% | -17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
EXPI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXPI is the less volatile stock with a 1.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UOKA's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXPI currently trades 55.1% from its 52-week high vs UOKA's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $175.00 | $12.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.05 | $5.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.1 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21.7M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
EXPI is the only dividend payer here at 2.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.2% |
EXPI leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
UOKA vs EXPI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UOKA or EXPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -66. 6% for MDJM Ltd (UOKA). Analysts rate eXp World Holdings, Inc. (EXPI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UOKA or EXPI?
Over the past 5 years, eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) delivered a total return of -72. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for MDJM Ltd (UOKA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPI returned +703. 2% versus UOKA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UOKA or EXPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 57β versus MDJM Ltd's 2. 28β — meaning UOKA is approximately 45% more volatile than EXPI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — UOKA or EXPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus -66. 6% for MDJM Ltd (UOKA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: eXp World Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -117. 1% for MDJM Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXPI leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UOKA or EXPI?
eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 5% net margin versus -65. 9% for MDJM Ltd — meaning it keeps -0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPI leads at -0. 4% versus -57. 7% for UOKA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UOKA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UOKA or EXPI?
In this comparison, EXPI (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. UOKA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is UOKA or EXPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 9% yield, +703. 2% 10Y return). MDJM Ltd (UOKA) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPI: +703. 2%, UOKA: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UOKA and EXPI?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
EXPI pays a dividend while UOKA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.