Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR vs AMWL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UPWK
Upwork Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.-39.2%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.63B
5Y Perf.+118.4%
TDOC
Teladoc Health, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.26B
5Y Perf.-96.8%
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • IL
Market Cap$422M
5Y Perf.-91.5%
AMWL
American Well Corporation

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$129M
5Y Perf.-98.7%

UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR vs AMWL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UPWK logoUPWK
HIMS logoHIMS
TDOC logoTDOC
FVRR logoFVRR
AMWL logoAMWL
IndustryStaffing & Employment ServicesMedical - Equipment & ServicesMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesInternet Content & InformationMedical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$1.38B$6.63B$1.26B$422M$129M
Revenue (TTM)$595M$2.35B$2.51B$429M$182M
Net Income (TTM)$109M$128M$-171M$29M$-88M
Gross Margin103.0%69.7%65.6%81.3%38.7%
Operating Margin20.7%4.6%-7.6%2.9%-50.6%
Forward P/E7.4x51.5x5.7x
Total Debt$381M$1.12B$1.04B$5M$5M
Cash & Equiv.$298M$229M$781M$129M$182M

UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR vs AMWLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

UPWK
HIMS
TDOC
FVRR
AMWL
StockSep 20May 26Return
Upwork Inc. (UPWK)10060.8-39.2%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100218.4+118.4%
Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC)1003.2-96.8%
Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR)1008.5-91.5%
American Well Corpo… (AMWL)1001.3-98.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR vs AMWL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UPWK and FVRR are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Fiverr International Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. HIMS and AMWL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
UPWK
Upwork Inc.
The Quality Compounder

UPWK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 18.3% margin vs AMWL's -48.2%
  • 8.5% ROA vs AMWL's -25.1%, ROIC 14.3% vs -95.1%
Best for: quality and efficiency
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 161.9% 10Y total return vs UPWK's -49.9%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs AMWL's -2.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TDOC
Teladoc Health, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, TDOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
The Income Pick

FVRR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 0.97
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
  • Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.94x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMWL
American Well Corporation
The Momentum Pick

AMWL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +14.3% vs FVRR's -59.7%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs AMWL's -2.0%
ValueFVRR logoFVRRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsUPWK logoUPWK18.3% margin vs AMWL's -48.2%
Stability / SafetyFVRR logoFVRRBeta 0.97 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMWL logoAMWL+14.3% vs FVRR's -59.7%
Efficiency (ROA)UPWK logoUPWK8.5% ROA vs AMWL's -25.1%, ROIC 14.3% vs -95.1%

UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR vs AMWL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UPWKUpwork Inc.
FY 2025
Enterprise
86.7%$683M
Marketplace
13.3%$105M
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TDOCTeladoc Health, Inc.
FY 2025
Other
100.0%$438M
FVRRFiverr International Ltd.
FY 2025
Marketplace Revenue
69.0%$297M
Services Revenue
31.0%$133M
AMWLAmerican Well Corporation
FY 2025
Platform Subscription
53.1%$132M
Visits
37.8%$94M
Others
9.1%$23M

UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR vs AMWL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUPWKLAGGINGAMWL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 13.8x AMWL's $182M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMWL's -48.2%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$595M$2.3B$2.5B$429M$182M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$150M$164M$42M$26M-$59M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$109M$128M-$171M$29M-$88M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$224M$73M$251M$103M-$42M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+103.0%+69.7%+65.6%+81.3%+38.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.7%+4.6%-7.6%+2.9%-50.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.3%+5.5%-6.8%+6.7%-48.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+37.7%+3.1%+10.0%+24.1%-22.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+28.4%-2.5%-1.6%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+29.6%-27.3%+32.1%+9.7%+44.5%
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TDOC and FVRR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 75% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UPWK's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$6.6B$1.3B$422M$129M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$7.5B$1.5B$299M-$48M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.78x50.32x-6.11x20.98x-1.30x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.37x51.51x5.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.66x42.68x15.13x22.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.76x2.82x0.50x0.98x0.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.35x12.25x0.89x1.06x0.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.71x89.61x4.40x4.06x
Evenly matched — TDOC and FVRR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-33 for AMWL. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.9%+23.7%-12.4%+7.0%-33.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.5%+6.0%-5.9%+3.1%-25.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.3%+10.7%-11.5%-0.2%-95.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.2%+10.9%-10.0%-0.3%-36.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964686
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.60x2.07x0.75x0.01x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$83M$892M$259M-$124M-$178M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$298M$229M$781M$129M$182M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$381M$1.1B$1.0B$5M$5M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense146.13x-8.76x-239.18x
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $278 for AMWL. Over the past 12 months, AMWL leads with a +14.3% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs AMWL's -42.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-46.5%-23.2%-1.3%-40.3%+59.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-34.8%-51.0%+1.5%-59.7%+14.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+32.0%+116.6%-73.3%-58.1%-80.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-74.8%+137.6%-95.4%-93.5%-97.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.9%+161.9%-41.1%-70.6%-98.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+9.7%+29.4%-35.6%-25.2%-42.2%
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FVRR and AMWL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMWL currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.16x2.40x1.91x0.97x1.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$22.84$70.43$9.77$34.13$9.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.02$13.74$4.40$9.67$3.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+46.5%+36.4%+71.2%+34.4%+84.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.054.574.152.967.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.4M34.9M5.5M924K59K
Evenly matched — FVRR and AMWL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: UPWK as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold", FVRR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8).

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.14$29.67$7.58$16.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts23194217
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.8%+1.4%0.0%+7.7%+0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

UPWK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HIMS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallUpwork Inc. (UPWK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR vs AMWL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR or AMWL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upwork Inc. (UPWK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR or AMWL?

On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.

(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Fiverr International Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR or AMWL?

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -97. 2% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus AMWL's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR or AMWL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiverr International Ltd.

(FVRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 148% more volatile than FVRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR or AMWL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teladoc Health, Inc. grew EPS 80. 6% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR or AMWL?

Upwork Inc.

(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -38. 4% for American Well Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -42. 2% for AMWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FVRR leads at 80. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR or AMWL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Fiverr International Ltd.

(FVRR) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 45. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR or AMWL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR or AMWL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fiverr International Ltd.

(FVRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FVRR: -70. 6%, TDOC: -41. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between UPWK and HIMS and TDOC and FVRR and AMWL?

These companies operate in different sectors (UPWK (Industrials) and HIMS (Healthcare) and TDOC (Healthcare) and FVRR (Communication Services) and AMWL (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMWL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

UPWK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TDOC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FVRR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMWL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UPWK and HIMS and TDOC and FVRR and AMWL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(UPWK: -100.0% · HIMS: 28.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(UPWK: 18.3% · HIMS: 5.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(UPWK: 12.8x · HIMS: 50.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.