UPXI vs OLPX vs SKIN vs HIMS vs AMZN

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 2% for Upexi, Inc. (UPXI). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Olaplex Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -98. 8% for Upexi, Inc. (UPXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus UPXI's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Olaplex Holdings, Inc.

(OLPX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Upexi, Inc. 's 3. 63β — meaning UPXI is approximately 332% more volatile than OLPX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Upexi, Inc. (UPXI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -39. 2% for Upexi, Inc. (UPXI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Upexi, Inc. grew EPS 92. 8% year-over-year, compared to -134. 1% for Olaplex Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -86. 5% for Upexi, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -79. 1% for UPXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLPX leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Olaplex Holdings, Inc.

(OLPX) trades at 24. 3x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 27. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKIN: 42. 9% to $1. 30.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Olaplex Holdings, Inc.

(OLPX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84)). Upexi, Inc. (UPXI) carries a higher beta of 3. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLPX: -91. 7%, UPXI: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (UPXI (Communication Services) and OLPX (Consumer Cyclical) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UPXI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OLPX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.