Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

USB vs CFG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
USB
U.S. Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$87.33B
5Y Perf.+55.5%
CFG
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$28.31B
5Y Perf.+166.4%

USB vs CFG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
USB logoUSB
CFG logoCFG
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$87.33B$28.31B
Revenue (TTM)$42.86B$12.35B
Net Income (TTM)$7.58B$1.70B
Gross Margin62.8%57.6%
Operating Margin22.2%15.3%
Forward P/E10.9x12.4x
Total Debt$77.93B$12.40B
Cash & Equiv.$46.89B$11.24B

USB vs CFGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

USB
CFG
StockMay 20May 26Return
U.S. Bancorp (USB)100155.5+55.5%
Citizens Financial … (CFG)100266.4+166.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: USB vs CFG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: USB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Citizens Financial Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
USB
U.S. Bancorp
The Banking Pick

USB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.01
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 2.73x
  • Beta 1.01, current ratio 2.73x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CFG
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CFG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth -3.2%
  • 260.3% 10Y total return vs USB's 74.4%
  • NIM 2.6% vs USB's 2.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCFG logoCFG1.3% NII/revenue growth vs USB's 0.3%
ValueUSB logoUSBLower P/E (10.9x vs 12.4x)
Quality / MarginsUSB logoUSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFG's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyUSB logoUSBBeta 1.01 vs CFG's 1.33
DividendsCFG logoCFG2.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CFG logoCFG+76.5% vs USB's +42.1%
Efficiency (ROA)USB logoUSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFG's 0.4%

USB vs CFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

USBU.S. Bancorp
FY 2024
Wealth Management And Investment Services
41.2%$12.2B
Consumer And Small Business Banking
31.3%$9.3B
Payment Services
31.1%$9.2B
Treasury and Corporate Support
-3.5%$-1,031,000,000
CFGCitizens Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Service Charges and Fees
53.5%$417M
Card Fees
46.5%$362M

USB vs CFG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUSBLAGGINGCFG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

USB leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

USB is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.9B annually — 3.5x CFG's $12.3B. USB is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CFG's 12.2%.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpCFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$42.9B$12.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$10.3B$2.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7.6B$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5.1B$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.8%+57.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.2%+15.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.7%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.8%+38.2%
USB leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

USB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 12.2x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 44% valuation discount to CFG's 21.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, USB's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CFG's 12.4x.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpCFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
Market CapShares × price$87.3B$28.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$118.4B$29.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.18x21.66x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.87x12.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.50x12.35x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.04x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.33x1.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.07x
USB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CFG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

USB delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for CFG. CFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USB's 1.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFG scores 7/9 vs USB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpCFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.5%+6.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.2%+3.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+4.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.19x0.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$31.0B$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$46.9B$11.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$77.9B$12.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.66x0.55x
CFG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CFG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CFG five years ago would be worth $15,060 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,718 for USB. Over the past 12 months, CFG leads with a +76.5% total return vs USB's +42.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CFG at 40.1% vs USB's 27.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpCFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.1%+12.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+42.1%+76.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+109.0%+174.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+7.2%+50.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+74.4%+260.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+27.8%+40.1%
CFG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — USB and CFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

USB is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CFG's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFG currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs USB's 91.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpCFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.01x1.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$61.19$68.79
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$40.89$37.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.8%+95.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.554.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9.1M4.6M
Evenly matched — USB and CFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

USB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates USB as "Hold" and CFG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.6% upside for USB (target: $64) vs 10.4% for CFG (target: $72). CFG is the only dividend payer here at 2.58% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpCFG logoCFGCitizens Financia…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$63.82$72.42
# AnalystsCovering analysts4938
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises143
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.70
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.8%
USB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

USB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CFG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallU.S. Bancorp (USB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

USB vs CFG: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is USB or CFG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

(CFG) is the stronger pick with 1. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — USB or CFG?

On trailing P/E, U.

S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 2x versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — USB or CFG?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

(CFG) delivered a total return of +50. 6%, compared to +7. 2% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFG returned +257. 8% versus USB's +73. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — USB or CFG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U.

S. Bancorp (USB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning CFG is approximately 31% more volatile than USB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 119% for U. S. Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — USB or CFG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

(CFG) is pulling ahead at 1. 3% versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: U. S. Bancorp grew EPS 21. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — USB or CFG?

U.

S. Bancorp (USB) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 7% net margin versus 12. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USB leads at 22. 2% versus 15. 3% for CFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is USB or CFG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, U.

S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USB: 13. 6% to $63. 82.

08

Which pays a better dividend — USB or CFG?

In this comparison, CFG (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is USB or CFG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

(CFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 6% yield, +257. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFG: +257. 8%, USB: +73. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between USB and CFG?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: USB is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CFG pays a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

USB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CFG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform USB and CFG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(USB: 0.3% · CFG: 1.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(USB: 17.7% · CFG: 12.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(USB: 12.2x · CFG: 21.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.