Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

USB vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
USB
U.S. Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$87.33B
5Y Perf.+57.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$849.03B
5Y Perf.+223.6%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$407.94B
5Y Perf.+122.2%
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$248.64B
5Y Perf.+203.7%

USB vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
USB logoUSB
JPM logoJPM
BAC logoBAC
WFC logoWFC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedBanks - DiversifiedBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$87.33B$849.03B$407.94B$248.64B
Revenue (TTM)$42.86B$270.79B$188.75B$125.40B
Net Income (TTM)$7.58B$58.03B$30.63B$21.06B
Gross Margin62.8%58.6%55.4%62.2%
Operating Margin22.2%27.7%18.5%18.6%
Forward P/E11.0x14.2x12.1x11.5x
Total Debt$77.93B$751.15B$365.90B$281.88B
Cash & Equiv.$46.89B$469.32B$231.84B$203.36B

USB vs JPM vs BAC vs WFCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

USB
JPM
BAC
WFC
StockMay 20May 26Return
U.S. Bancorp (USB)100157.9+57.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100323.6+223.6%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100222.2+122.2%
Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC)100303.7+203.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: USB vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. U.S. Bancorp is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. BAC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
USB
U.S. Bancorp
The Banking Pick

USB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.5x), PEG 1.29 vs 2.06
  • +42.1% vs WFC's +11.8%
Best for: value and momentum
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 21.7%
  • 471.7% 10Y total return vs BAC's 332.5%
  • 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -1.9%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 0.42x
  • PEG 0.78 vs WFC's 2.06
  • Beta 1.00, yield 2.4%, current ratio 0.42x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
The Banking Pick

WFC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 2.5% vs BAC's 1.8%
Best for: bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM14.6% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -1.9%
ValueUSB logoUSBLower P/E (11.0x vs 11.5x), PEG 1.29 vs 2.06
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBAC logoBACBeta 1.00 vs USB's 1.01
DividendsBAC logoBAC2.4% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)USB logoUSB+42.1% vs WFC's +11.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4%

USB vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

USBU.S. Bancorp
FY 2024
Wealth Management And Investment Services
41.2%$12.2B
Consumer And Small Business Banking
31.3%$9.3B
Payment Services
31.1%$9.2B
Treasury and Corporate Support
-3.5%$-1,031,000,000
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2024
Consumer & Community Banking
40.3%$71.5B
Commercial And Investment Bank
39.5%$70.1B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
12.2%$21.6B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
9.8%$17.4B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,037,000,000
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B
WFCWells Fargo & Company
FY 2024
Community Banking
43.2%$36.2B
Corporate and Investment Banking
23.1%$19.3B
Wealth And Investment Management
18.4%$15.4B
Wholesale Banking
15.3%$12.8B

USB vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGWFC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — USB and JPM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 6.3x USB's $42.9B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WFC's 15.7%.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…WFC logoWFCWells Fargo & Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$42.9B$270.8B$188.8B$125.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$10.3B$81.3B$36.6B$31.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7.6B$58.0B$30.6B$21.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5.1B-$119.7B$12.6B-$14.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.8%+58.6%+55.4%+62.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.2%+27.7%+18.5%+18.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.7%+21.6%+16.2%+15.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-15.5%+6.7%+2.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.8%+16.0%+18.3%+16.9%
Evenly matched — USB and JPM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

USB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.2x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 24% valuation discount to JPM's 15.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BAC offers better value at 0.91x vs WFC's 2.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…WFC logoWFCWells Fargo & Com…
Market CapShares × price$87.3B$849.0B$407.9B$248.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$118.4B$1.13T$542.0B$327.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.18x15.94x14.03x14.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.04x14.17x12.05x11.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.43x1.23x0.91x2.68x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.50x13.62x14.80x10.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.04x3.14x2.16x1.98x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.33x2.63x1.33x1.54x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF32.34x81.93x
USB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for BAC. USB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…WFC logoWFCWells Fargo & Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.5%+16.1%+10.1%+11.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+1.3%+0.9%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.2%+5.4%+3.2%+3.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+8.2%+4.2%+5.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.19x2.18x1.21x1.56x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$31.0B$281.8B$134.1B$78.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$46.9B$469.3B$231.8B$203.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$77.9B$751.1B$365.9B$281.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.66x0.74x0.44x0.60x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,034 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,718 for USB. Over the past 12 months, USB leads with a +42.1% total return vs WFC's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 34.0% vs BAC's 27.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…WFC logoWFCWells Fargo & Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.1%-2.3%-3.7%-15.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+42.1%+28.7%+33.9%+11.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+109.0%+140.8%+104.6%+120.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+7.2%+110.3%+38.9%+86.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+74.4%+471.7%+332.5%+92.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+27.8%+34.0%+27.0%+30.2%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USB's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs WFC's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…WFC logoWFCWells Fargo & Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.01x1.00x1.00x1.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$61.19$337.25$57.55$97.76
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$40.89$248.83$40.56$71.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.8%+93.4%+93.1%+82.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.553.457.145.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9.1M8.4M36.3M15.0M
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — USB and JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: USB as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", WFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for WFC (target: $98) vs 7.6% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.36% vs JPM's 1.63%.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…WFC logoWFCWells Fargo & Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$63.82$338.78$61.13$98.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts49615460
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+2.4%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises141463
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.13$1.27$1.48
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.4%+5.3%+9.0%
Evenly matched — USB and JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). USB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

USB vs JPM vs BAC vs WFC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is USB or JPM or BAC or WFC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — USB or JPM or BAC or WFC?

On trailing P/E, U.

S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 2x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 15. 9x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 11. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of America Corporation wins at 0. 78x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — USB or JPM or BAC or WFC?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to +7. 2% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +471. 7% versus USB's +74. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — USB or JPM or BAC or WFC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

00β versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning USB is approximately 1% more volatile than BAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Bancorp (USB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — USB or JPM or BAC or WFC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -1. 9% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to 11. 2% for Wells Fargo & Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — USB or JPM or BAC or WFC?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 15. 7% for Wells Fargo & Company — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 18. 5% for BAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is USB or JPM or BAC or WFC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WFC: 22. 1% to $98. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — USB or JPM or BAC or WFC?

In this comparison, BAC (2.

4% yield), WFC (1. 8% yield), JPM (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is USB or JPM or BAC or WFC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 6% yield, +471. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +471. 7%, USB: +74. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between USB and JPM and BAC and WFC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

JPM, BAC, WFC pay a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

USB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JPM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BAC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WFC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform USB and JPM and BAC and WFC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(USB: 0.3% · JPM: 14.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(USB: 17.7% · JPM: 21.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(USB: 12.2x · JPM: 15.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.