Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $20M | $342M | $3.09B | $730M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $153M | $1.04B | $275M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $15M | $84M | $46M |
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | 45.4% | 33.0% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 23.4% | 13.6% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.9x | 8.0x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $98M | $290M | $1.07B | $537M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $63M | $500M | $84M |
USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Maritime Cor… (USEA) | 100 | 119.4 | +19.4% |
| Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP) | 100 | 228.3 | +128.3% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 103.0 | +3.0% |
| Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USEA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.0%, EPS growth -26.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 83.2%
- 26.0% revenue growth vs SBLK's -17.6%
- 13.3% yield, vs SB's 4.0%
SHIP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 12.6x)
- +207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1%
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs SB's 7.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.73 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage
SB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.0%
- Beta 0.98, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.91x
- 16.8% margin vs USEA's -10.2%
- 3.4% ROA vs USEA's -2.6%, ROIC 6.6% vs 2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.0% revenue growth vs SBLK's -17.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.8% margin vs USEA's -10.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield, vs SB's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs USEA's -2.6%, ROIC 6.6% vs 2.4% |
USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
USEA leads in 1 of 6 categories
SB leads 1 • SHIP leads 1 • SBLK leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SHIP and SB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 24.8x USEA's $42M. SB is the more profitable business, keeping 16.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USEA's -10.2%. On growth, SHIP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $153M | $1.0B | $275M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $68M | $311M | $131M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $15M | $84M | $46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$6M | $209M | $55M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +45.4% | +33.0% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +23.4% | +13.6% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | +9.7% | +8.1% | +16.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | -4.2% | +20.0% | +19.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.2% | +18.6% | -2.7% | -3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +84.4% | +58.3% | -31.8% |
Valuation Metrics
USEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, SB trades at a 77% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SB's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $342M | $3.1B | $730M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $111M | $570M | $3.7B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.85x | 16.05x | 36.73x | 8.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.93x | 8.00x | 12.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.75x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.02x | 7.38x | 11.87x | 6.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 2.16x | 2.97x | 2.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 1.18x | 1.26x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.69x | 20.11x | 14.73x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SB delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-7 for USEA. SBLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USEA's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.2% | +5.3% | +3.4% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +2.5% | +2.2% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +6.1% | +3.2% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +7.1% | +4.0% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.63x | 1.03x | 0.44x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $91M | $228M | $572M | $453M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $63M | $500M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $98M | $290M | $1.1B | $537M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | 1.68x | 2.08x | 2.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SB five years ago would be worth $19,462 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,207 for USEA. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs SBLK's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs USEA's 3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.5% | +79.9% | +40.3% | +44.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +114.5% | +207.0% | +83.1% | +110.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.5% | +282.1% | +60.6% | +105.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.1% | +65.6% | +79.1% | +94.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.1% | -99.7% | +977.3% | +765.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.1% | +56.3% | +17.1% | +27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 1.21x | 0.73x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.36 | $16.77 | $27.20 | $7.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $5.37 | $14.79 | $3.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +96.6% | +98.6% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 62.9 | 72.8 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 258K | 1.4M | 576K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — USEA and SB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHIP as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", SB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs -39.4% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, USEA offers the higher dividend yield at 13.31% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $29.00 | $4.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 24 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.3% | +2.9% | +1.1% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $0.46 | $0.30 | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +4.0% |
USEA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Maritime Corporation (USEA) is the stronger pick with 26.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
On trailing P/E, Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
Over the past 5 years, Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) delivered a total return of +94. 6%, compared to +42. 1% for United Maritime Corporation (USEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 66% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 163% for United Maritime Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Maritime Corporation (USEA) is pulling ahead at 26.
0% versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for United Maritime Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, USEA leads at 83. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus -7. 4% for United Maritime Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus 10. 6% for USEA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USEA leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Safe Bulkers, Inc. — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
United Maritime Corporation (USEA) offers the highest yield at 13. 3%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USEA and SHIP and SBLK and SB?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: USEA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.