Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
UXIN vs CVNA vs KMX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
UXIN vs CVNA vs KMX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $21M | $86.77B | $5.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.26B | $22.52B | $27.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-280M | $1.60B | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 6.5% | 20.0% | 11.0% |
| Operating Margin | -8.4% | 9.2% | 1.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 51.4x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.75B | $633M | $19.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $2.33B | $247M |
UXIN vs CVNA vs KMX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uxin Limited (UXIN) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Carvana Co. (CVNA) | 100 | 430.4 | +330.4% |
| CarMax, Inc. (KMX) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UXIN vs CVNA vs KMX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UXIN is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.19, current ratio 0.45x
- Beta 1.19 vs CVNA's 2.14
CVNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth 431.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.3%
- 35.1% 10Y total return vs KMX's -22.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.14, Low D/E 15.1%, current ratio 4.31x
KMX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.32
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 51.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.6% revenue growth vs KMX's -0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 51.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs UXIN's -12.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs CVNA's 2.14 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.4% vs KMX's -39.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs UXIN's -14.2%, ROIC 34.3% vs -11.2% |
UXIN vs CVNA vs KMX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UXIN vs CVNA vs KMX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KMX is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.4B annually — 12.1x UXIN's $2.3B. CVNA is the more profitable business, keeping 7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UXIN's -12.4%. On growth, UXIN holds the edge at +64.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $22.5B | $27.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$178M | $2.3B | $791M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$280M | $1.6B | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $740M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +20.0% | +11.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +9.2% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.4% | +7.1% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.3% | +3.3% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.1% | +52.0% | -13.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.9% | +11.9% | -46.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KMX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, KMX trades at a 74% valuation discount to CVNA's 47.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KMX's 22.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVNA's 39.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $86.8B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $274M | $85.1B | $24.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.54x | 47.36x | 12.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 51.40x | 14.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 39.46x | 22.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 4.27x | 0.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 21.36x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 97.60x | 36.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVNA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVNA delivers a 45.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $8 for KMX. CVNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMX's 3.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMX scores 8/9 vs CVNA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +45.9% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.2% | +13.8% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.2% | +34.3% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | +20.0% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.15x | 3.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | -$1.7B | $19.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $2.3B | $247M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $633M | $19.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.99x | -0.68x | 3.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVNA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVNA five years ago would be worth $16,150 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $100 for UXIN. Over the past 12 months, CVNA leads with a +54.4% total return vs KMX's -39.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVNA at 2.3% vs UXIN's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.5% | -0.0% | +1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.5% | +54.4% | -39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.7% | +3441.8% | -45.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +61.5% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +3505.6% | -22.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.5% | +2.3% | -18.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UXIN and CVNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UXIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVNA's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVNA currently trades 82.2% from its 52-week high vs UXIN's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 2.14x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.36 | $486.89 | $71.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.45 | $255.79 | $30.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.0% | +82.2% | +55.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.1 | 57.4 | 47.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 2.7M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
KMX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UXIN as "Hold", CVNA as "Hold", KMX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.5% upside for UXIN (target: $5) vs -5.3% for KMX (target: $38).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.50 | $484.00 | $37.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 44 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.5% |
CVNA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KMX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
UXIN vs CVNA vs KMX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UXIN or CVNA or KMX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carvana Co.
(CVNA) is the stronger pick with 48. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for CarMax, Inc. (KMX). CarMax, Inc. (KMX) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uxin Limited (UXIN) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UXIN or CVNA or KMX?
On trailing P/E, CarMax, Inc.
(KMX) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Carvana Co. at 47. 4x. On forward P/E, CarMax, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UXIN or CVNA or KMX?
Over the past 5 years, Carvana Co.
(CVNA) delivered a total return of +61. 5%, compared to -99. 0% for Uxin Limited (UXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVNA returned +35. 1% versus UXIN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UXIN or CVNA or KMX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uxin Limited (UXIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
19β versus Carvana Co. 's 2. 14β — meaning CVNA is approximately 80% more volatile than UXIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carvana Co. (CVNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 3% for CarMax, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UXIN or CVNA or KMX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carvana Co.
(CVNA) is pulling ahead at 48. 6% versus -0. 0% for CarMax, Inc. (KMX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carvana Co. grew EPS 431. 4% year-over-year, compared to 6. 3% for CarMax, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVNA leads at 14. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UXIN or CVNA or KMX?
Carvana Co.
(CVNA) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -13. 7% for Uxin Limited — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVNA leads at 9. 3% versus -11. 7% for UXIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVNA leads at 20. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UXIN or CVNA or KMX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CarMax, Inc.
(KMX) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 51. 4x for Carvana Co. — 36. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UXIN: 58. 5% to $4. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UXIN or CVNA or KMX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is UXIN or CVNA or KMX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Uxin Limited (UXIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
19)). Carvana Co. (CVNA) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UXIN: -99. 7%, CVNA: +35. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UXIN and CVNA and KMX?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UXIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVNA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KMX is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.