Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VBNK vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
VBNK vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $596M | $20.40B | $1.92B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $120M | $4.77B | $1.33B | $1.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $481M | $136M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 75.1% | 64.7% | 95.2% |
| Operating Margin | 34.5% | 11.0% | 25.0% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 26.5x | 9.6x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $109M | $1.82B | $16M | $1.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $582M | $4.93B | $918M | $657M |
VBNK vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VersaBank (VBNK) | 100 | 213.7 | +113.7% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| LendingClub Corpora… (LC) | 100 | 158.0 | +58.0% |
| Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VBNK vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VBNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 446.7% 10Y total return vs SOFI's 52.7%
- Beta 0.73 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
- 0.4% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +69.8% vs UPST's -37.6%
SOFI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.36
- Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
- Beta 2.36, current ratio 466.38x
- NIM 5.4% vs VBNK's 2.0%
UPST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 58.9%, EPS growth 131.3%
- PEG 1.02 vs VBNK's 6.16
- 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs VBNK's 7.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs VBNK's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 26.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs UPST's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +69.8% vs UPST's -37.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs UPST's 0.9% |
VBNK vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VBNK vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VBNK leads in 3 of 6 categories
LC leads 3 • SOFI leads 0 • UPST leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VBNK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 39.7x VBNK's $120M. VBNK is the more profitable business, keeping 23.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPST's 5.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $120M | $4.8B | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $760M | $287M | $68M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $481M | $136M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $73M | -$2.6B | -$2.9B | -$146M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +75.1% | +64.7% | +95.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +11.0% | +25.0% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +10.1% | +10.2% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -83.5% | -2.1% | -15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.4% | -56.7% | +3.2% | -169.2% |
Valuation Metrics
LC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, LC trades at a 77% valuation discount to UPST's 64.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPST offers better value at 4.49x vs VBNK's 15.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $596M | $20.4B | $1.9B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $249M | $17.3B | $1.0B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.29x | 41.03x | 14.51x | 64.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.57x | 26.45x | 9.56x | 14.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 15.05x | — | — | 4.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.63x | 22.75x | 2.57x | 50.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.77x | 4.28x | 1.44x | 2.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.91x | 1.32x | 3.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LC delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $6 for SOFI. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPST's 2.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LC scores 6/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | +5.9% | +9.5% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +3.6% | +17.3% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +1.2% | +3.3% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.17x | 0.01x | 2.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$473M | -$3.1B | -$902M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $582M | $4.9B | $918M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $109M | $1.8B | $16M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.25x | 0.45x | 0.67x | 1.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VBNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VBNK five years ago would be worth $15,293 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,022 for UPST. Over the past 12 months, VBNK leads with a +69.8% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 43.0% vs UPST's 29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.7% | -41.7% | -12.7% | -36.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.8% | +23.0% | +62.4% | -37.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +185.4% | +192.5% | +142.9% | +116.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.9% | -3.1% | +15.1% | -69.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +446.7% | +52.7% | -27.7% | -1.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.9% | +43.0% | +34.4% | +29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
VBNK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VBNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VBNK currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 2.54x | 2.36x | 2.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.02 | $32.73 | $21.67 | $87.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.10 | $12.56 | $9.70 | $23.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +48.9% | +77.0% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 41.9 | 57.4 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 65.8M | 2.1M | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VBNK as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", LC as "Buy", UPST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for UPST (target: $45) vs -30.3% for VBNK (target: $13). VBNK is the only dividend payer here at 0.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $20.89 | $22.75 | $45.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 27 | 29 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VBNK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LC leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
VBNK vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VBNK or SOFI or LC or UPST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for VersaBank (VBNK). LendingClub Corporation (LC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate VersaBank (VBNK) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VBNK or SOFI or LC or UPST?
On trailing P/E, LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the cheapest at 14.
5x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. at 64. 4x. On forward P/E, LendingClub Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Upstart Holdings, Inc. wins at 1. 02x versus VersaBank's 6. 16x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VBNK or SOFI or LC or UPST?
Over the past 5 years, VersaBank (VBNK) delivered a total return of +52.
9%, compared to -69. 8% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VBNK returned +446. 7% versus LC's -27. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VBNK or SOFI or LC or UPST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VersaBank (VBNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
73β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 304% more volatile than VBNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VBNK or SOFI or LC or UPST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus 7. 7% for VersaBank (VBNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to -39. 6% for VersaBank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VBNK or SOFI or LC or UPST?
VersaBank (VBNK) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
7% net margin versus 5. 0% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VBNK leads at 34. 5% versus 5. 1% for UPST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VBNK leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VBNK or SOFI or LC or UPST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 02x versus VersaBank's 6. 16x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, LendingClub Corporation (LC) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 16. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPST: 55. 8% to $45. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — VBNK or SOFI or LC or UPST?
In this comparison, VBNK (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SOFI, LC, UPST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VBNK or SOFI or LC or UPST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, VersaBank (VBNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
73), +446. 7% 10Y return). LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VBNK: +446. 7%, LC: -27. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VBNK and SOFI and LC and UPST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VBNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.